PI-RADS 2.0 for Prostate MRI

被引:0
|
作者
Franiel, T. [1 ]
Roethke, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Jena, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany
[2] MVZ Conradia GmbH, CONRADIA Radiol & Nukl Med, Alte Holstenstr 16, D-21031 Hamburg, Germany
来源
RADIOLOGE | 2017年 / 57卷 / 08期
关键词
BIOPSY-NAIVE MEN; CANCER; MANAGEMENT; ANTIGEN; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00117-017-0269-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The PI-RADS 2.0 classification was established by an international collaboration of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR), the American College of Radiology (ACR), and AdMetech Foundation to globally standardize the acquisition and interpretation of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The PI-RADS 2.0 aims to improve the detection, localization, staging and risk stratification of patients with suspected or histologically confirmed prostate cancer. Suspicious areas on T2-weighted (T2w) MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) were assessed for the presence of a clinically significant prostate cancer with scale from 1 to 5 with 5 being most likely to represent clinically significant prostate cancer. The dominant sequence to detect significant prostate cancer in the peripheral zone is DWI and for the transition zone T2w images. For the local staging of prostate cancer criteria for the assessment of an extracapsular growth were formulated. © 2017, Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 678
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multiparametric prostate MRI and structured reporting: benefits and challenges in the PI-RADS era
    Sanas Mir-Bashiri
    Kaneschka Yaqubi
    Piotr Woźnicki
    Niklas Westhoff
    Jost von Hardenberg
    Thomas Huber
    Matthias F. Froelich
    Wieland H. Sommer
    Maximilian F. Reiser
    Stefan O. Schoenberg
    Dominik Nörenberg
    Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology, 2021, 4 : 21 - 40
  • [22] Multiparametric prostate MRI and structured reporting: benefits and challenges in the PI-RADS era
    Mir-Bashiri, Sanas
    Yaqubi, Kaneschka
    Woznicki, Piotr
    Westhoff, Niklas
    von Hardenberg, Jost
    Huber, Thomas
    Froelich, Matthias F.
    Sommer, Wieland H.
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    Noerenberg, Dominik
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 4 (01) : 21 - 40
  • [23] Follow-up MR imaging of PI-RADS 3 and PI-RADS 4 prostate lesions
    Hauth, Elke
    Jaeger, Horst
    Hohmuth, Horst
    Beer, Meinrad
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2017, 43 : 64 - 68
  • [24] The disappearing PI-RADS 5 prostate lesion
    Sabarwal, Vikram K.
    Ritchie, Cayde
    Rayn, Kareem
    Turkbey, Baris
    Pinto, Peter
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 (02) : 9281 - 9283
  • [25] Validation of the PI-RADS language: predictive values of PI-RADS lexicon descriptors for detection of prostate cancer
    Madhuri M. Rudolph
    Alexander D. J. Baur
    Matthias Haas
    Hannes Cash
    Kurt Miller
    Samy Mahjoub
    Alexander Hartenstein
    David Kaufmann
    Roman Rotzinger
    Chau Hung Lee
    Patrick Asbach
    Bernd Hamm
    Tobias Penzkofer
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 4262 - 4271
  • [26] PI-RADS 3 Lesions: Role of Prostate MRI Texture Analysis in the Identification of Prostate Cancer
    Giambelluca, Dario
    Cannella, Roberto
    Vernuccio, Federica
    Comelli, Albert
    Pavone, Alice
    Salvaggio, Leonardo
    Galia, Massimo
    Midiri, Massimo
    Lagalla, Roberto
    Salvaggio, Giuseppe
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 50 (02) : 175 - 185
  • [27] Prostate cancer in PI-RADS scores 1 and 2 version 2.1: a comparison to previous PI-RADS versions
    Bogner, Katja
    Engelhard, Karl
    Wuest, Wolfgang
    Hamel, Sajad
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (06) : 2187 - 2196
  • [28] Prostate cancer in PI-RADS scores 1 and 2 version 2.1: a comparison to previous PI-RADS versions
    Katja Bogner
    Karl Engelhard
    Wolfgang Wuest
    Sajad Hamel
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 2187 - 2196
  • [29] Prostate MRI: practical guidelines for interpreting and reporting according to PI-RADS version 2.1
    Sanchez-Oro, R.
    Nuez, J. Torres
    Martinez-Sanz, G.
    Ortega, Q. Grau
    Bleila, M.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2020, 62 (06): : 437 - 451
  • [30] Prostate MRI with PI-RADS v2.1: initial detection and active surveillance
    Grace C. Lo
    Daniel J. A. Margolis
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 2133 - 2142