机构:
Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
Univ Western Australia, Sch Math & Stat, Crawley, WA 6009, AustraliaUniv Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
Zhang, Linjun
[1
,2
]
Small, Michael
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Western Australia, Sch Math & Stat, Crawley, WA 6009, AustraliaUniv Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
Small, Michael
[2
]
Judd, Kevin
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Western Australia, Sch Math & Stat, Crawley, WA 6009, AustraliaUniv Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
Judd, Kevin
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Math & Stat, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
Scale-free networks;
Power-law;
Complex networks;
RANDOM GRAPHS;
DISTRIBUTIONS;
MOTIFS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.physa.2015.03.074
中图分类号:
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号:
0702 ;
摘要:
Many complex natural and physical systems exhibit patterns of interconnection that conform, approximately, to a network structure referred to as scale-free. Preferential attachment is one of many algorithms that have been introduced to model the growth and structure of scale-free networks. With so many different models of scale-free networks it is unclear what properties of scale-free networks are typical, and what properties are peculiarities, of a particular growth or construction process. We propose a simple maximum entropy process which provides the best representation of what are typical properties of scale-free networks, and provides a standard against which real and algorithmically generated networks can be compared. As an example we consider preferential attachment and find that this particular growth model does not yield typical realizations of scale-free networks. In particular, the widely discussed "fragility" of scale-free networks is actually found to be due to the peculiar "hub-centric" structure of preferential attachment networks. We provide a method to generate or remove this latent hub-centric bias thereby demonstrating exactly which features of preferential attachment networks are atypical of the broader class of scale-free networks. We are also able to statistically demonstrate whether real networks are typical realizations of scale-free networks, or networks with that particular degree distribution; using a new surrogate generation method for complex networks, exactly analogous the widely used surrogate tests of nonlinear time series analysis. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.