Will Scale-Free Popularity Develop Scale-Free Geo-Social Networks?

被引:4
|
作者
Liu, Dong [1 ]
Fodor, Viktoria [1 ]
Rasmussen, Lars Kildehoj [1 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sch Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Access Linnaeus Ctr, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Social tie; network model; popularity; geographic distance; degree distribution; clustering coefficient; COMMUNICATION; EVOLUTION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1109/TNSE.2018.2841942
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Empirical results show that spatial factors such as distance, population density and communication range affect our social activities, also reflected by the development of ties in social networks. This motivates the need for social network models that take these spatial factors into account. Therefore, in this paper we propose a gravity-low-based geo-social network model, where connections develop according to the popularity of the individuals, but are constrained through their geographic distance and the surrounding population density. Specifically, we consider a power-law distributed popularity, and random node positions governed by a Poisson point process. We evaluate the characteristics of the emerging networks, considering the degree distribution, the average degree of neighbors and the local clustering coefficient. These local metrics reflect the robustness of the network, the information dissemination speed and the communication locality. We show that unless the communication range is strictly limited, the emerging networks are scale-free, with a rank exponent affected by the spatial factors. Even the average neighbor degree and the local clustering coefficient show tendencies known in non-geographic scale-free networks, at least when considering individuals with low popularity. At high-popularity values, however, the spatial constraints lead to popularity-independent average neighbor degrees and clustering coefficients.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 598
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exactly scale-free scale-free networks
    Zhang, Linjun
    Small, Michael
    Judd, Kevin
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2015, 433 : 182 - 197
  • [2] Subnets of scale-free networks are not scale-free: Sampling properties of networks
    Stumpf, MPH
    Wiuf, C
    May, RM
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (12) : 4221 - 4224
  • [3] Scale-free networks
    Barabási, AL
    Bonabeau, E
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 2003, 288 (05) : 60 - 69
  • [4] On the Visualization of Social and Other Scale-Free Networks
    Jia, Yuntao
    Hoberock, Jared
    Garland, Michael
    Hart, John C.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2008, 14 (06) : 1285 - 1292
  • [5] Nucleation in scale-free networks
    Chen, Hanshuang
    Shen, Chuansheng
    Hou, Zhonghuai
    Xin, Houwen
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2011, 83 (03):
  • [6] Scale-free networks are rare
    Anna D. Broido
    Aaron Clauset
    [J]. Nature Communications, 10
  • [7] Revisiting "scale-free" networks
    Keller, EF
    [J]. BIOESSAYS, 2005, 27 (10) : 1060 - 1068
  • [8] Scale-free networks in evolution
    Campos, PRA
    de Oliveira, VM
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2003, 325 (3-4) : 570 - 576
  • [9] Scale-free networks on lattices
    Rozenfeld, AF
    Cohen, R
    ben-Avraham, D
    Havlin, S
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2002, 89 (21)
  • [10] Quasistatic scale-free networks
    Mukherjee, G
    Manna, SS
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2003, 67 (01)