Techno-economic evaluation of biomass-to-fuels with solid-oxide electrolyzer

被引:49
|
作者
Zhang, Hanfei [1 ]
Wang, Ligang [2 ,3 ]
Van Herle, Jan [2 ]
Marechal, Francois [3 ]
Desideri, Umberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Energy Syst Terr & Construct Engn, Pisa, Italy
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol Lausanne EPFL, Grp Energy Mat, Sion, Switzerland
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol Lausanne EPFL, Ind Proc & Energy Syst Engn, Sion, Switzerland
关键词
Biomass gasification; Biomass-to-fuel; power-to-liquid; power-to-gas; Energy storage; Solid-oxide electrolyzer; NATURAL-GAS SNG; FISCHER-TROPSCH; CO-ELECTROLYSIS; DIMETHYL ETHER; PROCESS INTEGRATION; METHANOL SYNTHESIS; SYNTHETIC FUEL; OPTIMAL-DESIGN; POWER; GASIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115113
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Thermochemical biomass-to-fuel conversion requires an increased hydrogen concentration in the syngas derived from gasification, which is currently achieved by water-gas-shift reaction and CO2 removal. State-of-the-art biomass-to-fuels convert less than half of the biomass carbon with the remaining emitted as CO2. Full conversion of biomass carbon can be achieved by integrating solid-oxide electrolyzer with different concepts: (1) steam electrolysis with the hydrogen produced injected into syngas, and (2) co-electrolysis of CO2 and H2O to convert the CO2 captured from the syngas. This paper investigates techno-economically steam- or co-electrolysis-based biomass-to-fuel processes for producing synthetic natural gas, methanol, dimethyl ether and jet fuel, considering system-level heat integration and optimal placement of steam cycles for heat recovery. The results show that state-of-the-art biomass-to-fuels achieve similar energy efficiencies of 48-51% (based on a lower heating value) for the four different fuels. The integrated concept with steam electrolysis achieves the highest energy efficiency: 68% for synthetic natural gas, 64% for methanol, 63% for dimethyl ether, and 56% for jet fuel. The integrated concept with co-electrolysis can enhance the state-of-the-art energy efficiency to 66% for synthetic natural gas, 61% for methanol, and 54% for jet fuel. The biomass-to-dimethyl ether with co-electrolysis only reaches an efficiency of 49%, due to additional heat demand. The levelized cost of the product of the integrated concepts highly depends on the price and availability of renewable electricity. The concept with co-electrolysis allows for additional operation flexibility without renewable electricity, resulting in high annual production. Thus, with limited annual available hours of renewable electricity, biomass-to-fuel with co-electrolysis is more economically convenient than that with steam electrolysis. For a plant scale of 60 MWth biomass input with the renewable electricity available for 1800 h annually, the levelized cost of product of biomass-to-synthesis-natural-gas with co-electrolysis is 35 $/GJ, 20% lower than that with steam-electrolysis.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways
    Anex, Robert P.
    Aden, Andy
    Kazi, Feroz Kabir
    Fortman, Joshua
    Swanson, Ryan M.
    Wright, Mark M.
    Satrio, Justinus A.
    Brown, Robert C.
    Daugaard, Daren E.
    Platon, Alex
    Kothandaraman, Geetha
    Hsu, David D.
    Dutta, Abhijit
    [J]. FUEL, 2010, 89 : S29 - S35
  • [32] Solid-oxide fuel cells with hydrocarbon fuels
    Kee, RJ
    Zhu, HY
    Goodwin, DG
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2005, 30 : 2379 - 2404
  • [33] A review of techno-economic data for road transportation fuels
    Navas-Anguita, Zaira
    Garcia-Gusano, Diego
    Iribarren, Diego
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 112 : 11 - 26
  • [34] Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways
    Anex, Robert P.
    Hsu, David D.
    Wright, Mark M.
    Swanson, Ryan M.
    Fortman, Joshua
    Daugaard, Daren E.
    Platon, Alexandru
    Kabir, Feroz
    Aden, Andy
    Dutta, Abhijit
    Kothandaraman, Geetha
    Brown, Ronald E.
    Satrio, Justinus A.
    Brown, Robert C.
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 238
  • [35] Process design and techno-economic evaluation for the production of platform chemical for hydrocarbon fuels from lignocellulosic biomass using biomass-derived γ-valerolactone
    Ahmad, Nauman
    Ahmad, Nabeel
    Ahmed, Usama
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 161 : 750 - 755
  • [36] Techno-economic evaluation of biomass-to-methanol production via circulating fluidized bed gasifier and solid oxide electrolysis cells: A comparative study
    Rajaee, Fatemeh
    Guandalini, Giulio
    Romano, Matteo C.
    Ritvanen, Jouni
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 301
  • [37] Conceptualization and techno-economic evaluation of municipal solid waste based microgrid
    Singh, Arashdeep
    Basak, Prasenjit
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 238
  • [38] Techno-economic evaluation of biomass-to-synthesis gas (BtS) based on gasification
    Gao, Wei
    Wang, Shaohui
    Li, De-Xun
    Liu, Jia-Bao
    Farahini, Mohammad Reza
    Huo, Yuhong
    Imran, Muhammad
    Doranehgard, Mohammad
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2018, 13 (02) : 83 - 90
  • [39] Conceptualization and techno-economic evaluation of microgrid based on PV/Biomass in Indian scenario
    Singh, Arashdeep
    Basak, Prasenjit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 317
  • [40] Techno-economic study for a gasification plant processing residues of sewage sludge and solid recovered fuels
    Alves, Octavio
    Calado, Luis
    Panizio, Roberta M.
    Goncalves, Margarida
    Monteiro, Eliseu
    Brito, Paulo
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 131 : 148 - 162