Techno-economic evaluation of biomass-to-fuels with solid-oxide electrolyzer

被引:49
|
作者
Zhang, Hanfei [1 ]
Wang, Ligang [2 ,3 ]
Van Herle, Jan [2 ]
Marechal, Francois [3 ]
Desideri, Umberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Energy Syst Terr & Construct Engn, Pisa, Italy
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol Lausanne EPFL, Grp Energy Mat, Sion, Switzerland
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol Lausanne EPFL, Ind Proc & Energy Syst Engn, Sion, Switzerland
关键词
Biomass gasification; Biomass-to-fuel; power-to-liquid; power-to-gas; Energy storage; Solid-oxide electrolyzer; NATURAL-GAS SNG; FISCHER-TROPSCH; CO-ELECTROLYSIS; DIMETHYL ETHER; PROCESS INTEGRATION; METHANOL SYNTHESIS; SYNTHETIC FUEL; OPTIMAL-DESIGN; POWER; GASIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115113
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Thermochemical biomass-to-fuel conversion requires an increased hydrogen concentration in the syngas derived from gasification, which is currently achieved by water-gas-shift reaction and CO2 removal. State-of-the-art biomass-to-fuels convert less than half of the biomass carbon with the remaining emitted as CO2. Full conversion of biomass carbon can be achieved by integrating solid-oxide electrolyzer with different concepts: (1) steam electrolysis with the hydrogen produced injected into syngas, and (2) co-electrolysis of CO2 and H2O to convert the CO2 captured from the syngas. This paper investigates techno-economically steam- or co-electrolysis-based biomass-to-fuel processes for producing synthetic natural gas, methanol, dimethyl ether and jet fuel, considering system-level heat integration and optimal placement of steam cycles for heat recovery. The results show that state-of-the-art biomass-to-fuels achieve similar energy efficiencies of 48-51% (based on a lower heating value) for the four different fuels. The integrated concept with steam electrolysis achieves the highest energy efficiency: 68% for synthetic natural gas, 64% for methanol, 63% for dimethyl ether, and 56% for jet fuel. The integrated concept with co-electrolysis can enhance the state-of-the-art energy efficiency to 66% for synthetic natural gas, 61% for methanol, and 54% for jet fuel. The biomass-to-dimethyl ether with co-electrolysis only reaches an efficiency of 49%, due to additional heat demand. The levelized cost of the product of the integrated concepts highly depends on the price and availability of renewable electricity. The concept with co-electrolysis allows for additional operation flexibility without renewable electricity, resulting in high annual production. Thus, with limited annual available hours of renewable electricity, biomass-to-fuel with co-electrolysis is more economically convenient than that with steam electrolysis. For a plant scale of 60 MWth biomass input with the renewable electricity available for 1800 h annually, the levelized cost of product of biomass-to-synthesis-natural-gas with co-electrolysis is 35 $/GJ, 20% lower than that with steam-electrolysis.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomass pellets for power generation in India: a techno-economic evaluation
    Pallav Purohit
    Vaibhav Chaturvedi
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25 : 29614 - 29632
  • [22] Solar crop dryer for saving commercial fuels: a techno-economic evaluation
    Purohit, P.
    Kandpal, T. C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AMBIENT ENERGY, 2005, 26 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [23] A standardized methodology for the techno-economic evaluation of alternative fuels - A case study
    Albrecht, Friedemann G.
    Koenig, Daniel H.
    Baucks, Nadine
    Dietrich, Ralph-Uwe
    [J]. FUEL, 2017, 194 : 511 - 526
  • [24] Techno-Economic Optimization of an Integrated Biomass Waste Gasifier-Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Plant
    Perez-Fortes, Mar
    He, Victoria
    Nakajo, Arata
    Schiffmann, Juerg
    Marechal, Francois
    Van Herle, Jan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 9
  • [25] A techno-economic analysis of biomass gasifiers integrated with high and intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells
    McIlveen-Wright, D. R.
    Moglie, M.
    Rezvani, S.
    Huang, Y.
    Anderson, M.
    Redpath, D.
    Dave, A.
    Hewitt, N. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2011, 35 (12) : 1037 - 1047
  • [26] Techno-economic analysis of biomass to transportation fuels and electricity via fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing
    Brown, Tristan R.
    Thilakaratne, Rajeeva
    Brown, Robert C.
    Hu, Guiping
    [J]. FUEL, 2013, 106 : 463 - 469
  • [27] Techno-economic evaluation of a combined biomass gasification-solid oxide fuel cell system for ethanol production via syngas fermentation
    Ma, Shuai
    Dong, Changqing
    Hu, Xiaoying
    Xue, Junjie
    Zhao, Ying
    Wang, Xiaoqiang
    [J]. FUEL, 2022, 324
  • [28] Techno-Economic Evaluation of Solar Hybridized Biomass Gasification Polygeneration Plants
    Ngo, Nguyet Ky
    Smith, Toby
    Nathan, Graham
    Ashman, Peter
    Hosseini, Tara
    Beath, Andrew
    Stechel, Ellen B.
    Saw, Woei Lean
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2024, 38 (03) : 2058 - 2073
  • [29] Techno-economic evaluation of thermo-chemical biomass-to-ethanol
    He, Jie
    Zhang, Wennan
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2011, 88 (04) : 1224 - 1232
  • [30] Sustainable H2 production/separation by integration of solid oxide electrolyzer, biomass gasifier and H2 separation membrane: A techno-economic/environmental evaluation and multi-objective optimization
    Fei, Zhongjie
    Zhanguo, Su
    Lu, Jianbo
    Singh, Pradeep Kumar
    Dahari, Mahidzal
    Majdi, Hasan Sh.
    Ali, H. Elhosiny
    Bouzgarrou, Souhail Mohamed
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2023, 177 : 909 - 920