RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers

被引:12
|
作者
Boleij, Annemarie [1 ]
Tops, Bastiaan B. J. [2 ]
Rombout, Paul D. M. [1 ]
Dequeker, Elizabeth M. [3 ]
Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L. [1 ,2 ]
van Krieken, J. Han [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Human Genet, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Leuven, KU Leuven, Biomed Qual Assurance Res Unit, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pathol, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
RAS; colorectal cancer; metastasis; quality control; next generation sequencing; EXTERNAL-QUALITY-ASSESSMENT; WILD-TYPE KRAS; PANITUMUMAB; PERCENTAGE; MUTATIONS; CETUXIMAB; TRIAL;
D O I
10.18632/oncotarget.3804
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In 2013 the European Medicine Agency (EMA) restricted the indication for anti-EGFR targeted therapy to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with a wild-type RAS gene, increasing the need for reliable RAS mutation testing. We evaluated the completeness and reproducibility of RAS-testing in the Netherlands. From 17 laboratories, tumor DNA of the first 10 CRC cases tested in 2014 in routine clinical practice was re-tested by a reference laboratory using a custom next generation sequencing panel. In total, 171 CRC cases were re-evaluated for hotspot mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF. Most laboratories had introduced complete RAS-testing (65%) and BRAF-testing (71%) by January 2014. The most employed method for all hotspot regions was Sanger sequencing (range 35.7 - 49.2%). The reference laboratory detected all mutations that had been found in the participating laboratories (n = 92), plus 10 additional mutations. This concerned three RAS and seven BRAF mutations that were missed due to incomplete testing of the participating laboratory. Overall, the concordance of tests performed by both the reference and participating laboratory was 100% (163/163; kappa-static 1.0) for RAS and 100% (144/144; kappa-static 1.0) for BRAF. Our study shows that RAS and BRAF mutations can be reproducibly assessed using a variety of testing methods.
引用
收藏
页码:15681 / 15689
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Monitoring of RAS mutant clones in plasma of patients with RAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer
    A. Fernández Montes
    E. Élez
    A. Vivancos
    N. Martínez
    P. González
    M. Covela
    J. de la Cámara
    A. Cousillas
    J. C. Méndez
    B. Graña
    E. Aranda
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2022, 24 : 1209 - 1214
  • [42] RAS mutations testing and choice of first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer patients in our institute
    Iwata, Takashi
    Ojima, Eiki
    Mohri, Tomomi
    Noguchi, Tomohumi
    Hashimoto, Kiyoshi
    Kawamura, Mikio
    Watanabe, Hideki
    Ito, Hideki
    Ikeda, Tetsuya
    Tonouchi, Hitoshi
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28 : 98 - 98
  • [43] RAS/ BRAF molecular profile in metastatic versus non-metastatic colorectal cancer
    Douik, H.
    Sahraoui, G.
    Charfi, L.
    Doghri, R.
    Mrad, K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 34 : S151 - S151
  • [44] New Developments in Treating RAS-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Janssens, Katleen
    Lambrechts, Chinouk
    Geerinckx, Barbara
    Op de Beeck, Ken
    Van Camp, Guy
    Oliveres, Helena
    Prenen, Hans
    Vandamme, Timon
    Peeters, Marc
    CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 24 (08) : 965 - 987
  • [45] Cabozantinib and Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Strickler, John H.
    Rushing, Christel N.
    Uronis, Hope E.
    Morse, Michael A.
    Niedzwiecki, Donna
    Blobe, Gerard C.
    Moyer, Ashley N.
    Bolch, Emily
    Webb, Renee
    Haley, Sherri
    Hatch, Ace J.
    Altomare, Ivy P.
    Sherrill, Gary B.
    Chang, David Z.
    Wells, James L.
    Hsu, S. David
    Jia, Jingquan
    Zafar, S. Yousuf
    Nixon, Andrew B.
    Hurwitz, Herbert I.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2021, 26 (06): : 465 - +
  • [46] RAS Mutations as Predictive Biomarkers in Clinical Management of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Waring, Paul
    Tie, Jeanne
    Maru, Dipen
    Karapetis, Christos S.
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2016, 15 (02) : 95 - 103
  • [47] Controversies in the treatment of RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
    R. Vera
    M. Salgado
    M. J. Safont
    J. Gallego
    E. González
    E. Élez
    E. Aranda
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2021, 23 : 827 - 839
  • [48] New Developments in Treating RAS-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Katleen Janssens
    Chinouk Lambrechts
    Barbara Geerinckx
    Ken Op de Beeck
    Guy Van Camp
    Helena Oliveres
    Hans Prenen
    Timon Vandamme
    Marc Peeters
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2023, 24 : 965 - 987
  • [49] Perspectives in the Treatment of RAS or BRAF Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Rosati, Gerardo
    Aprile, Giuseppe
    Basile, Debora
    Avallone, Antonio
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [50] Controversies in the treatment of RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
    Vera, R.
    Salgado, M.
    Safont, M. J.
    Gallego, J.
    Gonzalez, E.
    Elez, E.
    Aranda, E.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 23 (04): : 827 - 839