RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers

被引:13
|
作者
Boleij, Annemarie [1 ]
Tops, Bastiaan B. J. [2 ]
Rombout, Paul D. M. [1 ]
Dequeker, Elizabeth M. [3 ]
Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L. [1 ,2 ]
van Krieken, J. Han [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Human Genet, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Leuven, KU Leuven, Biomed Qual Assurance Res Unit, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pathol, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
RAS; colorectal cancer; metastasis; quality control; next generation sequencing; EXTERNAL-QUALITY-ASSESSMENT; WILD-TYPE KRAS; PANITUMUMAB; PERCENTAGE; MUTATIONS; CETUXIMAB; TRIAL;
D O I
10.18632/oncotarget.3804
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In 2013 the European Medicine Agency (EMA) restricted the indication for anti-EGFR targeted therapy to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with a wild-type RAS gene, increasing the need for reliable RAS mutation testing. We evaluated the completeness and reproducibility of RAS-testing in the Netherlands. From 17 laboratories, tumor DNA of the first 10 CRC cases tested in 2014 in routine clinical practice was re-tested by a reference laboratory using a custom next generation sequencing panel. In total, 171 CRC cases were re-evaluated for hotspot mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF. Most laboratories had introduced complete RAS-testing (65%) and BRAF-testing (71%) by January 2014. The most employed method for all hotspot regions was Sanger sequencing (range 35.7 - 49.2%). The reference laboratory detected all mutations that had been found in the participating laboratories (n = 92), plus 10 additional mutations. This concerned three RAS and seven BRAF mutations that were missed due to incomplete testing of the participating laboratory. Overall, the concordance of tests performed by both the reference and participating laboratory was 100% (163/163; kappa-static 1.0) for RAS and 100% (144/144; kappa-static 1.0) for BRAF. Our study shows that RAS and BRAF mutations can be reproducibly assessed using a variety of testing methods.
引用
收藏
页码:15681 / 15689
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer in central Tunisia
    Melliti, R.
    Belaid, I.
    Makram, H.
    Imene, C.
    Faten, E.
    Ammar, N.
    Ben Fatma, L.
    Mokni, M.
    Slim, B.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S194 - S195
  • [22] RAS mutation clearance in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
    Huiyan, L.
    Wang, Z.
    Lin, W.
    Wang, Z.
    Xu, R.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S444 - S444
  • [23] Evolution of RAS testing over time: factors influencing mutation rates in metastatic colorectal cancer patients
    Dufraing, Kelly
    Keppens, Cleo
    Tack, Veronique
    Siebers, Albert Gerrit
    Kafatos, George
    Dube, Sabada
    Demonty, Gaston
    Lowe, Kimberly
    Kroeze, Leonie Ilse
    Ligtenberg, Marjolijn
    Normanno, Nicola
    Tembuyser, Lien
    Sara, Vander Borght
    van Krieken, Joannes Henricus
    Dequeker, Elisabeth Marie C.
    COLORECTAL CANCER, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [24] RAS mutation testing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in French clinical practice: A status report in 2014
    Lievre, Astrid
    Merlin, Jean-Louis
    Sabourin, Jean-Christophe
    Artru, Pascal
    Tong, Sabine
    Libert, Lucie
    Audhuy, Francois
    Gicquel, Corinne
    Moureau-Zabotto, Laurence
    Ossendza, Roch-Anicet
    Laurent-Puig, Pierre
    Ducreux, Michel
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2018, 50 (05) : 507 - 512
  • [25] Cost-Effectiveness of RAS Genetic Testing Strategies in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Unim, Brigid
    Pitini, Erica
    De Vito, Corrado
    D'Andrea, Elvira
    Marzuillo, Carolina
    Villari, Paolo
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 (01) : 114 - 126
  • [26] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF K-RAS TESTING AND CETUXIMAB FOR METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER IN JAPAN
    Shiroiwa, T.
    Motoo, Y.
    Tsutani, K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (07) : A513 - A513
  • [27] Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes based on RAS/BRAF status in metastatic colorectal cancer-Analysis of the Prospective Dutch Colorectal Cancer cohort
    van Nassau, Sietske C. M. W.
    Zwart, Koen
    van Der Baan, Frederieke H.
    Vink, Geraldine R.
    Elferink, Marloes A. G.
    Snaebjornsson, Petur
    May, Anne M.
    Koopman, Miriam
    Roodhart, Jeanine M. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2025,
  • [28] ASO Author Reflections: RAS Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Guillaume Passot
    Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
    Yun Shin Chun
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 850 - 851
  • [29] ASO Author Reflections: RAS Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Passot, Guillaume
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    Chun, Yun Shin
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 : 850 - 851
  • [30] RAS heterogeneity as a prognostic marker in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Loree, Jonathan M.
    Lam, Michael
    Morris, Jeffrey
    Overman, Michael J.
    Raghav, Kanwal Pratap Singh
    Eng, Cathy
    Dasari, A.
    Kee, Bryan K.
    Fogelman, David R.
    Wolff, Robert A.
    Jiang, Zhiqin
    Davis, Jennifer S.
    Shaw, Kenna Rael
    Broaddus, Russell
    Routbort, Mark
    Luthra, Rajyalakshmi
    Maru, Dipen M.
    Menter, David
    Meric-Bernstam, Funda
    Kopetz, Scott
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (04)