A method for benchmarking product family design alternatives

被引:0
|
作者
Thevenot, Henri J. [1 ]
Simpson, Timothy W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Harold & Inge Marcus Dept Ind & Mfg Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
product family; benchmarking; commonality and variety;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Today's companies are pressured to develop platform-based product families to increase variety while keeping production costs low. Determining why a platform works, and alternatively why it does not, is an important step in the successful implementation of product families and product platforms in any industry. Internal and competitive benchmarking is essential to obtain knowledge of how successful product families are implemented, thus avoiding potential pitfalls of a poor product platform design strategy. While the two fields of product family design and benchmarking have been growing rapidly lately, we have found few tools that combine the two for product family benchmarking. To address this emerging need, we introduce the Product Family Benchmarking Method (PFBenchmark) to assess product family design alternatives (PFDAs) based on commonality/variety tradeoff and cost analysis. The proposed method utilizes the Comprehensive Metric for Commonality developed in previous work to assess the level of commonality and variety in each PFDA, as well as the corresponding manufacturing cost. The method compares not only (1) existing PFDAs but also (2) the potential cost savings and commonality/variety improvement after redesign using two plots - the Commonality/Variety Plot and the Cost Plot enabling more effective comparisons across PFDAs. An example of benchmarking two families of valves is presented to demonstrate the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 930
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benchmarking of product recovery alternatives in reverse logistics
    Sharma, S. K.
    Mahapatra, S. S.
    Parappagoudar, M. B.
    [J]. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2016, 23 (02) : 406 - 424
  • [2] A Product Dissection-Based Methodology to Benchmark Product Family Design Alternatives
    Thevenot, Henri J.
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2009, 131 (04) : 0410021 - 0410029
  • [3] Product family architecture design with predictive, data-driven product family design method
    Ma, Jungmok
    Kim, Harrison M.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2016, 27 (01) : 5 - 21
  • [4] Product family architecture design with predictive, data-driven product family design method
    Jungmok Ma
    Harrison M. Kim
    [J]. Research in Engineering Design, 2016, 27 : 5 - 21
  • [5] PRODUCT FAMILY AND PRODUCT PLATFORM BENCHMARKING WITH COMMONALITY AND VARIETY INDICES
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2017, VOL 2B, 2017,
  • [6] Product Family Extension Configuration Design: the theory and method
    Zhao, Yanwei
    Zhang, Meiyan
    Su, Nan
    Chen, Jian
    [J]. 2010 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND AUTOMATION ENGINEERING (ICCAE 2010), VOL 3, 2010, : 321 - 326
  • [7] Cooperative Coevolutionary Optimization Method for Product Family Design
    Schulze, L.
    Li, L.
    [J]. 2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 291 - 295
  • [8] Design Method for a Scalable Modular Structure Product Family
    Adhitama, Yonanda
    Rosenstiel, Wolfgang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE SOCO'14-CISIS'14-ICEUTE'14, 2014, 299 : 289 - 299
  • [9] A variation-based method for product family design
    Nayak, RU
    Chen, W
    Simpson, TW
    [J]. ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2002, 34 (01) : 65 - 81
  • [10] Method of Product Family Design Based on Shape Grammar
    Lu Zhaolin
    Tang Wencheng
    Xue Chengqi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 27 - 31