A method for benchmarking product family design alternatives

被引:0
|
作者
Thevenot, Henri J. [1 ]
Simpson, Timothy W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Harold & Inge Marcus Dept Ind & Mfg Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
product family; benchmarking; commonality and variety;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Today's companies are pressured to develop platform-based product families to increase variety while keeping production costs low. Determining why a platform works, and alternatively why it does not, is an important step in the successful implementation of product families and product platforms in any industry. Internal and competitive benchmarking is essential to obtain knowledge of how successful product families are implemented, thus avoiding potential pitfalls of a poor product platform design strategy. While the two fields of product family design and benchmarking have been growing rapidly lately, we have found few tools that combine the two for product family benchmarking. To address this emerging need, we introduce the Product Family Benchmarking Method (PFBenchmark) to assess product family design alternatives (PFDAs) based on commonality/variety tradeoff and cost analysis. The proposed method utilizes the Comprehensive Metric for Commonality developed in previous work to assess the level of commonality and variety in each PFDA, as well as the corresponding manufacturing cost. The method compares not only (1) existing PFDAs but also (2) the potential cost savings and commonality/variety improvement after redesign using two plots - the Commonality/Variety Plot and the Cost Plot enabling more effective comparisons across PFDAs. An example of benchmarking two families of valves is presented to demonstrate the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 930
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Scalable Product Family Design Method Based on Sensitivity Analysis for Performance and Cost
    Li, Baishu
    Luo, Xinggang
    Tang, Jiafu
    [J]. 2009 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-AIDED INDUSTRIAL DESIGN & CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, VOLS 1-3: E-BUSINESS, CREATIVE DESIGN, MANUFACTURING - CAID&CD'2009, 2009, : 1031 - 1035
  • [42] Improvement of Evaluation Method of Elderly Family Medical Product Design Based on AHP
    Yue, Han
    Zhu, Tian-Lu
    Zhou, Zheng-Jun
    Zhou, Tao
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [43] A decision methodology for ranking environmental aspects of product design alternatives
    Brinkley, A
    Karlsson, M
    Kirby, JR
    Pitts, D
    [J]. ELECTRONICS GOES GREEN 2000 (PLUS): A CHALLENGE FOR THE NEXT MILLENNIUM, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 491 - 495
  • [44] Evaluation of sub-component alternatives in product design processes
    Akgunduz, A
    Zetu, D
    Banerjee, P
    Liang, D
    [J]. ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2002, 18 (01) : 69 - 81
  • [45] An integrated fuzzy approach for evaluating remanufacturing alternatives of a product design
    Wang X.
    Chan H.K.
    [J]. Journal of Remanufacturing, 3 (1)
  • [46] Patterns in product family architecture design
    Hallsteinsen, S
    Fægri, TE
    Syrstad, M
    [J]. SOFTWARE PRODUCT-FAMILY ENGINEERING, 2004, 3014 : 261 - 268
  • [47] Module Family Design for Modular Product
    Adhitama, Yonanda
    Rosenstiel, Wolfgang
    [J]. INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS'2014, VOL 2: TOOLS, ARCHITECTURES, SYSTEMS, APPLICATIONS, 2015, 323 : 465 - 476
  • [48] Frameworks for product family design and development
    Alizon, Fabrice
    Khadke, Kiran
    Thevenot, Henri J.
    Gershenson, John K.
    Marion, Tucker J.
    Shooter, Steven B.
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    [J]. CONCURRENT ENGINEERING-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2007, 15 (02): : 187 - 199
  • [49] Product Family Design With Solution Spaces
    Eichstetter, Markus
    Mueller, Steffen
    Zimmermann, Markus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2015, 137 (12)
  • [50] Robust modular product family design
    Jiang, L
    Allada, V
    [J]. INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS IN DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING IV, 2001, 4565 : 62 - 73