Climate Sensitivity of GFDL's CM4.0

被引:22
|
作者
Winton, M. [1 ]
Adcroft, A. [2 ]
Dunne, J. P. [1 ]
Held, I. M. [2 ]
Shevliakova, E. [1 ]
Zhao, M. [1 ]
Guo, H. [1 ]
Hurlin, W. [1 ]
Krasting, J. [1 ]
Knutson, T. [1 ]
Paynter, D. [1 ]
Silvers, L. G. [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, GFDL, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Program Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] Princeton Univ, Cooperat Inst Modeling Earth Syst, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[4] SUNY Stony Brook, Sch Marine & Atmospher Sci, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
SURFACE-TEMPERATURE-CHANGE; ENERGY BUDGET CONSTRAINTS; GLOBAL ATMOSPHERE; MODEL; SIMULATIONS; DEPENDENCE; FEEDBACK; DIOXIDE; PATTERN; RUNS;
D O I
10.1029/2019MS001838
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
GFDL's new CM4.0 climate model has high transient and equilibrium climate sensitivities near the middle of the upper half of CMIP5 models. The CMIP5 models have been criticized for excessive sensitivity based on observations of present-day warming and heat uptake and estimates of radiative forcing. An ensemble of historical simulations with CM4.0 produces warming and heat uptake that are consistent with these observations under forcing that is at the middle of the assessed distribution. Energy budget-based methods for estimating sensitivities based on these quantities underestimate CM4.0's sensitivities when applied to its historical simulations. However, we argue using a simple attribution procedure that CM4.0's warming evolution indicates excessive transient sensitivity to greenhouse gases. This excessive sensitivity is offset prior to recent decades by excessive response to aerosol and land use changes. Plain Language Summary We evaluate the climate sensitivity of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) CM4.0 climate model. Climate sensitivity is an important factor determining the magnitude of future climate change under anthropogenic forcing. We find that CM4.0 is a high climate sensitivity model. A simple method for estimating climate sensitivity from historical changes significantly underestimates CM4.0's sensitivity when applied to CM4.0's historical simulation. However, more sophisticated methods that make use of the detailed evolution of global warming identify CM4.0 as most likely too sensitive to anthropogenic forcing.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tropical Cyclone Simulation and Response to CO2 Doubling in the GFDL CM2.5 High-Resolution Coupled Climate Model
    Kim, Hyeong-Seog
    Vecchi, Gabriel A.
    Knutson, Thomas R.
    Anderson, Whit U.
    Delworth, Thomas L.
    Rosati, Anthony
    Zeng, Fanrong
    Zhao, Ming
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2014, 27 (21) : 8034 - 8054
  • [32] Smagorinsky's GFDL - Building the team
    Lewis, John M.
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 89 (09) : 1339 - 1353
  • [33] On the Resolution Sensitivity of Equatorial Precipitation in a GFDL Global Atmospheric Model
    Lin, Pu
    Ming, Yi
    Robinson, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [34] SENSITIVITY OF THE GFDL OCEAN MODEL TO DIFFERENT DIFFUSIVITIES FOR HEAT AND SALT
    GARGETT, AE
    HOLLOWAY, G
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY, 1992, 22 (10) : 1158 - 1177
  • [35] Seasonal Predictability of Extratropical Storm Tracks in GFDL's High-Resolution Climate Prediction Model
    Yang, Xiaosong
    Vecchi, Gabriel A.
    Gudgel, Rich G.
    Delworth, Thomas L.
    Zhang, Shaoqing
    Rosati, Anthony
    Jia, Liwei
    Stern, William F.
    Wittenberg, Andrew T.
    Kapnick, Sarah
    Msadek, Rym
    Underwood, Seth D.
    Zeng, Fanrong
    Anderson, Whit
    Balaji, Venkatramani
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2015, 28 (09) : 3592 - 3611
  • [36] Assessing the Climate Impacts of the Observed Atlantic Multidecadal Variability Using the GFDL CM2.1 and NCAR CESM1 Global Coupled Models
    Ruprich-Robert, Yohan
    Msadek, Rym
    Castruccio, Frederic
    Yeager, Stephen
    Delworth, Tom
    Danabasoglu, Gokhan
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2017, 30 (08) : 2785 - 2810
  • [37] The Mechanisms of Cloudiness Evolution Responsible for Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity in Climate Model INM-CM4-8
    Volodin, E.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 48 (24)
  • [38] Salinity Biases and the Variability of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in GFDL-CM3
    Fernanda D. A. O. Matos
    Janini Pereira
    Marcus Dengler
    Ocean Science Journal, 2020, 55 : 505 - 520
  • [39] The GFDL Global Atmosphere and Land Model AM4.0/LM4.0:1. Simulation Characteristics With Prescribed SSTs
    Zhao, M.
    Golaz, J-C
    Held, I. M.
    Guo, H.
    Balaji, V.
    Benson, R.
    Chen, J-H
    Chen, X.
    Donner, L. J.
    Dunne, J. P.
    Dunne, K.
    Durachta, J.
    Fan, S. -M.
    Freidenreich, S. M.
    Garner, S. T.
    Ginoux, P.
    Harris, L. M.
    Horowitz, L. W.
    Krasting, J. P.
    Langenhorst, A. R.
    Liang, Z.
    Lin, P.
    Lin, S. -J.
    Malyshev, S. L.
    Mason, E.
    Milly, P. C. D.
    Ming, Y.
    Naik, V.
    Paulot, F.
    Paynter, D.
    Phillipps, P.
    Radhakrishnan, A.
    Ramaswamy, V.
    Robinson, T.
    Schwarzkopf, D.
    Seman, C. J.
    Shevliakova, E.
    Shen, Z.
    Shin, H.
    Silvers, L. G.
    Wilson, J. R.
    Winton, M.
    Wittenberg, A. T.
    Wyman, B.
    Xiang, B.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2018, 10 (03): : 691 - 734
  • [40] Review of simulations of climate variability and change with the GFDL R30 coupled climate model
    T. Delworth
    R. Stouffer
    K. Dixon
    M. Spelman
    T. Knutson
    A. Broccoli
    P. Kushner
    R. Wetherald
    Climate Dynamics, 2002, 19 : 555 - 574