Breast tumor size assessment: Comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound

被引:49
|
作者
Jiang, Yu-Xin [1 ]
Liu, He [1 ]
Liu, Ji-Bin [2 ]
Zhu, Qing-Li [1 ]
Sun, Qiang [3 ]
Chang, Xiao-Yan [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Diagnost Ultrasound, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Surg, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Pathol, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
来源
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2007年 / 33卷 / 12期
关键词
breast; contrast-enhanced ultrasound; tumor measurement; pathology;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.06.002
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Accurate assessment of tumor size is necessary when selecting patients for breast-conserving surgery. In the study of breast contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), we found that tumor size discrepancy between CEUS and conventional ultrasound (US) existed in some breast lesions, for which the reasons are not clear. Breast CEUS examinations were performed in 104 patients with breast lesions. The measurement of the 104 breast tumors on conventional US was obtained and compared with the measurement on CEUS. A difference in measuring tumor size of > 3 mm for tumors up to 1.7 cm and 4 mm for tumors >= 1.7 cm, was defined as a significant discrepancy between conventional US and CEUS. The histopathological examination of size discrepancy was performed and the margin characteristics of breast cancers with larger measurements were compared with those with unchanged measurements. Among the 104 lesions (43 malignant, 60 benign, I borderline), the size of 27 breast cancers and one granulomatous mastitis appeared larger at CEUS. Pathologic examinations of the region corresponding to the measurement discrepancy were mainly ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), invasive carcinoma with a DCIS component, adenosis with lobular hyperplasia in breast cancers and inflammatory cell infiltration in one granulomatous mastitis. Well-defined margin characteristics were significantly different between breast cancers with larger measurements at CEUS and those with unchanged measurements of size (p = 0.002), whereas no significant difference was found between the two groups in ill-defined, spiculated, hyperechoic halo, microlobulated and angulated margins (p = 0.463, 0.117, 0.194, 0.666 and 0.780, respectively). This initial study suggests that significant discrepancy of breast lesion measurement between conventional US and CEUS is more likely presented in breast cancer than benign lesions. The pathologic findings corresponding to the region of size increased at CEUS are malignant in most malignant lesions and benign in benign lesions. It is difficult to predict whether the size measurement of the breast cancer increases at CEUS based on the margin characteristics showed on conventional US. (E-mail: yuxinjiangxh@yahoo.com.cn) (c) 2007 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:1873 / 1881
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Detection of colorectal cancer hepatic metastases with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Comparison with conventional B-mode ultrasound
    Yarmenitis, S. D.
    Karantanas, A.
    Bakantaki, A.
    Papantoniou, Y.
    Gourtsoyiannis, N.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2007, 25 (01) : 86 - 93
  • [32] Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Response Assessment for Breast Cancer: A Comparison with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathology
    Jia, Wan-Ru
    Tang, Lei
    Wang, Deng-Bin
    Chai, Wei-Min
    Fei, Xiao-Chun
    He, Jian-Rong
    Chen, Man
    Wang, Wen-Ping
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [33] Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound with Sonazoid for evaluating liver abscess in comparison with conventional B-mode ultrasound
    Kishina, Manabu
    Koda, Masahiko
    Tokunaga, Shiho
    Miyoshi, Kennichi
    Fujise, Yuki
    Kato, Jun
    Matono, Tomomitsu
    Sugihara, Takaaki
    Murawaki, Yoshikazu
    HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 45 (03) : 337 - 342
  • [34] Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Response Assessment for Breast Cancer: A Comparison with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathology
    Wan-Ru Jia
    Lei Tang
    Deng-Bin Wang
    Wei-Min Chai
    Xiao-Chun Fei
    Jian-Rong He
    Man Chen
    Wen-Ping Wang
    Scientific Reports, 6
  • [35] Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography: Importance of the Assessment of Breast Tumor Size
    Nicosia, Luca
    Bozzini, Anna Carla
    Latronico, Antuono
    Cassano, Enrico
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (03) : 489 - 490
  • [36] Comparison of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer
    Zhuang, Lingling
    Ming, Xu
    Liu, Jun
    Jia, Chao
    Jin, Yubiao
    Wang, Jing
    Shi, Qiusheng
    Wu, Rong
    Jin, Lifang
    Du, Lianfang
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 95 (1130):
  • [37] Intra-individual comparison of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound and SonoVue contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma
    Guo, Danxia
    Wan, Weijun
    Bai, Xiumei
    Wen, Rong
    Peng, Jinbo
    Lin, Peng
    Liao, Wei
    Huang, Weiche
    Liu, Dun
    Peng, Yuye
    Kang, Tong
    Yang, Hong
    He, Yun
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (05) : 1432 - 1443
  • [38] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in spinal tumor surgery
    Francesco Prada
    Ignazio G. Vetrano
    Francesco DiMeco
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2018, 160 : 1869 - 1871
  • [39] Innovative Ultrasound: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of the Kidneys
    Stock, Konrad
    Kuebler, Herbert
    Maurer, Tobias
    Weiss, Daniel
    Weskott, Hans-Peter
    Heemann, Uwe
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2017, 48 (02) : 120 - 126
  • [40] Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Antiangiogenic Tumor Therapy
    Klotz, Laura V.
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    Scheckinger, Siiri
    Strieth, Sebastian
    Eichhorn, Martin E.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (05) : 2571 - 2576