Safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:23
|
作者
Wang, Li [1 ]
Zhang, Chuanlin [2 ]
Mu, Shaoyu [1 ]
Yeh, Chao Hsing [3 ]
Chen, Liqun [1 ]
Zhang, Zeju [4 ]
Wang, Xueqin [2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Sch Nursing, 1 Yi Xue Yuan Rd, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Med Univ, Intens Care Unit, Affiliated Hosp 1, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Johns Hopkins Sch Nursing, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Chongqing Med & Pharmaceut Coll, Sch Nursing, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
catheter-directed thrombolysis; meta-analysis; safety; systematic review; venous thrombosis; VENOUS THROMBOSIS; ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY; PLUS ANTICOAGULATION; PULMONARY-EMBOLISM; OUTCOMES; RISK; GUIDELINES; EFFICACY; QUALITY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000007922
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Despite established guidelines, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for the management of acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) should not be overstated because the risks of CDT are uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis to comprehensively and quantitatively evaluate the safety of CDT for patients with acute lower extremity DVT. Methods: Relevant databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus, were searched up to January 2017. The inclusion criteria were applied to select patients with acute lower extremity DVT treated by CDT or compared CDT with anticoagulation. In case series studies, the pooled estimates of safety outcomes for complications, pulmonary embolism (PE), and mortality were calculated across studies. In studies comparing CDT with anticoagulation, summary odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. Results: Of the 1696 citations identified, 24 studies (6 comparing CDT with anticoagulation and 18 case series) including 9157 patients met the eligibility criteria. In the case series studies, the pooled risks of major, minor, and total complications were 0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.04), 0.07 (95% CI: 0.05-0.08), and 0.09 (95% CI: 0.08-0.11), respectively; other pooled risk results were 0.00 for PE (95% CI: 0.00-0.01) and 0.07 for mortality (95% CI: 0.03-0.11). Our meta-analysis of 6 studies comparing the risk of complications and PE related to CDT with those related to anticoagulation showed that CDT was associated with an increased risk of complications (OR = 4.36; 95% CI: 2.94-6.47) and PE (OR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.37-1.79). Conclusion: Acute lower extremity DVT patients receiving CDT are associated with a low risk of complications. However, compared with anticoagulation, CDT is associated with a higher risk of complications and PE. Rare mortality related to thrombolytic therapy was reported. More evidence should be accumulated to prove the safety of CDT.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis
    Vedantham, Suresh
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN HEMATOLOGY, 2010, 17 (05) : 464 - 468
  • [22] Effectiveness and safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis in conjunction with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: A meta-analysis
    Li, Weihao
    Al-Kaylani, Abdallah Zaid
    Zeebregts, Clark J.
    El Moumni, Mostafa
    de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.
    van der Doef, Hubert P. J.
    Bokkers, Reinoud P. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2023, 11 (04) : 843 - +
  • [23] Effectiveness and safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Catalani, F.
    Furbringer-Schwarz, A.
    Farmakis, I. T.
    Avgerinos, E. D.
    Bikdeli, B.
    Fumagalli, R. M.
    Hobohm, L.
    Keller, K.
    Klok, F. A.
    Lang, I.
    Piazza, G.
    Valerio, L.
    Kucher, N.
    Konstantinides, S. V.
    Barco, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44
  • [24] Comparison of ultrasound-accelerated versus conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Farrokhi, Mehrdad
    Khurshid, Maria
    Mohammadi, Sassan
    Yarmohammadi, Bardia
    Bahramvand, Yaser
    Nasrollahi, Elham
    Taheri, Fatemeh
    [J]. VASCULAR, 2022, 30 (02) : 365 - 374
  • [25] A Retrospective Comparison of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis versus Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis for Treatment of Acute Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Tian, Yu
    Huang, Zhiyong
    Luo, Kunhui
    Zhang, Ning
    Yuan, Biao
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 74 : 306 - 314
  • [26] Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis: Treatment of Acute Portal Vein Thrombosis
    Muzangwa, L. G.
    Lien, K.
    Rana, V.
    Groth, M.
    Iftikhar, A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 205
  • [27] Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis versus AngioJet pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis
    Kang, Tao
    Lu, Yao-Liang
    Han, Song
    Li, Xiao-Qiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [28] Catheter-directed thrombolysis with percutaneous rheolytic thrombectomy versus thrombolysis alone in upper and lower extremity deep vein thrombosis
    Kim, Hyun S.
    Patra, Ajanta
    Paxton, Ben E.
    Khan, Jawad
    Streiff, Michael B.
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 29 (06) : 1003 - 1007
  • [29] Catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis
    Saunders, J. H.
    Arya, P. H.
    Abisi, S.
    Yong, Y. P.
    MacSweeney, S.
    Braithwaite, B.
    Altaf, N.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (08) : 1025 - 1029
  • [30] Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis with Percutaneous Rheolytic Thrombectomy Versus Thrombolysis Alone in Upper and Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis
    Hyun S. Kim
    Ajanta Patra
    Ben E. Paxton
    Jawad Khan
    Michael B. Streiff
    [J]. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2006, 29 : 1003 - 1007