Non-invasive diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, Anno 2005

被引:2
|
作者
Michiels, JJ
Hoogsteden, H
Pattynama, PMT
机构
[1] Goodheart Inst & Fdn, Goodheart Inst, Freedom Educ & Sci Hemostasis Thrombosis Res & Sc, NL-3609 AT Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Pulm Dis, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Radiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
pulmonary embolism; deep vein thrombosis; venous thromboembolism; ventilation perfusion scan; spiral CT; ELISA D-dimer; clinical score assessment;
D O I
10.1080/00015458.2005.11679662
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Pulmonary angiography is the gold standard for segmental pulmonary embolism (PE) but no longer for sub-segmental PE, because the inter-observer agreement for angiographically documented subsegmental PE is only 60%. Two non-invasive tools exclude PE with a negative predictive value of > 99% : a normal perfusion lung scan and a normal rapid ELISA VIDAS D-dimer test. The positive predictive value is 85 to 88% for a high probability ventilation-perfusion lung scan (VP-scan) and > 95% for helical spiral CT. The prevalence of PE in management studies of symptomatic patients with a non-diagnostic VP-scan is 20 to 24%. Helical spiral CT detects all clinically relevant PE and a large number of alternative diagnoses in symptomatic patients with a non-diagnostic VP-scan or a high probability VP-scan. Single-slice helical CT as the primary diagnostic test in patients with suspected PE in three retrospective studies and in two prospective management study indicate that the negative predictive value of a normal helical spiral CT, a negative compression ultrasonography of the legs (CUS) together with a low or intermediate pre-test clinical probability is > 99%. Therefore, helical spiral CT can replace both the VP-scan and pulmonary angiography to safely rule in and out PE. The combination of clinical assessment, a rapid ELISA VIDAS D-dimer followed by CUS will reduce the need for helical spiral CT by 40 to 50%.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 34
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exosomal Protein Signature for Non-Invasive Differential Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
    Adduri, S.
    Alzate, K. V.
    Iliuk, A.
    Cai, K.
    Miller, J. W.
    Pal, A. K.
    De Frias, S. Poli
    Vasireddy, R.
    Nicastro, D.
    Kaminski, N.
    Rosas, I. O.
    Konduru, N. V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 201
  • [42] MRI model-based non-invasive differential diagnosis in pulmonary hypertension
    Lungu, A.
    Wild, J. M.
    Capener, D.
    Kiely, D. G.
    Swift, A. J.
    Hose, D. R.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2014, 47 (12) : 2941 - 2947
  • [43] NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF IDIOPATHIC DILATATION OF THE PULMONARY-ARTERY - A CLINICAL CASE
    GRIMALDI, DR
    MALATINO, LS
    FIORE, CE
    PARISI, VG
    FERRETTI, G
    MINERVA CARDIOANGIOLOGICA, 1981, 29 (11): : 671 - 676
  • [44] Cardiac amyloidosis: non-invasive diagnosis
    Hotta, Viviane Tiemi
    Pinto Giorgi, Maria Clementina
    Fernandes, Fabio
    Donadio Abduchl, Maria Cristina
    Gomes Marinho Falcao, IlAndrea Maria
    Mady, Charles
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2020, 66 (03): : 345 - 352
  • [45] NON-INVASIVE METHODS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF JAUNDICE
    不详
    LANCET, 1979, 2 (8132): : 18 - 20
  • [46] NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF MITOCHONDRIAL MYOPATHY
    POULTON, J
    GARDINER, RM
    LANCET, 1989, 1 (8644): : 961 - 961
  • [47] NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSIS IN VENOUS DISEASES
    KOHLER, M
    MEDIZINISCHE WELT, 1982, 33 (16): : 589 - 592
  • [48] NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF VENOUS THROMBOSIS
    HANEL, K
    ABBOTT, W
    FULCHINO, D
    REIDY, N
    BREWSTER, D
    ATHANASOULIS, C
    CIRCULATION, 1980, 62 (04) : 337 - 337
  • [49] NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF VENOUS DISEASE
    BARNES, RW
    GERIATRICS, 1979, 34 (11) : 71 - 75
  • [50] Advances in Non-invasive Prenatal Diagnosis
    Vaiopoulos, Aristeidis G.
    Athanasoula, Kalliopi C.
    Papantoniou, Nikolas
    Kolialexi, Aggeliki
    IN VIVO, 2013, 27 (02): : 165 - 170