Non-invasive diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, Anno 2005

被引:2
|
作者
Michiels, JJ
Hoogsteden, H
Pattynama, PMT
机构
[1] Goodheart Inst & Fdn, Goodheart Inst, Freedom Educ & Sci Hemostasis Thrombosis Res & Sc, NL-3609 AT Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Pulm Dis, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Radiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
pulmonary embolism; deep vein thrombosis; venous thromboembolism; ventilation perfusion scan; spiral CT; ELISA D-dimer; clinical score assessment;
D O I
10.1080/00015458.2005.11679662
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Pulmonary angiography is the gold standard for segmental pulmonary embolism (PE) but no longer for sub-segmental PE, because the inter-observer agreement for angiographically documented subsegmental PE is only 60%. Two non-invasive tools exclude PE with a negative predictive value of > 99% : a normal perfusion lung scan and a normal rapid ELISA VIDAS D-dimer test. The positive predictive value is 85 to 88% for a high probability ventilation-perfusion lung scan (VP-scan) and > 95% for helical spiral CT. The prevalence of PE in management studies of symptomatic patients with a non-diagnostic VP-scan is 20 to 24%. Helical spiral CT detects all clinically relevant PE and a large number of alternative diagnoses in symptomatic patients with a non-diagnostic VP-scan or a high probability VP-scan. Single-slice helical CT as the primary diagnostic test in patients with suspected PE in three retrospective studies and in two prospective management study indicate that the negative predictive value of a normal helical spiral CT, a negative compression ultrasonography of the legs (CUS) together with a low or intermediate pre-test clinical probability is > 99%. Therefore, helical spiral CT can replace both the VP-scan and pulmonary angiography to safely rule in and out PE. The combination of clinical assessment, a rapid ELISA VIDAS D-dimer followed by CUS will reduce the need for helical spiral CT by 40 to 50%.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 34
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
    Rodriguez de Alba, M.
    Bustamante-Aragones, A.
    Ramos, C.
    CHROMOSOME RESEARCH, 2007, 15 : 14 - 15
  • [22] Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
    Soothill, Peter
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 82 (09) : 619 - 619
  • [23] NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF CARDIOMYOPATHIES
    HINRICHS, A
    KREMER, P
    BLEIFELD, W
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1982, 107 (36) : 1357 - 1360
  • [24] Non-invasive diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism:: Less useful when they are needed the most
    Lijmer, JG
    Sanson, BJ
    Mac Gillavry, M
    Prins, MH
    Brandjes, DPM
    Büller, HR
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 1999, : 256 - 257
  • [25] NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF PYOMYOSITIS
    YAGUPSKY, P
    SHAHAK, E
    BARKI, Y
    CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 1988, 27 (06) : 299 - 301
  • [26] CEUS for the non-invasive Diagnosis
    Jecker, Peter
    Pfeiffer, Jens
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2014, 93 (07) : 440 - 441
  • [27] NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF THE CARDIOMYOPATHIES
    MORGANROTH, J
    CHEN, CC
    MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1980, 64 (01) : 33 - 60
  • [28] THE COMBINED NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSIS
    COLIN, C
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 1980, 9 (01): : 103 - 104
  • [29] Non-invasive malaria diagnosis
    Bradbury, Jane
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 14 (02): : 106 - 106
  • [30] NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF PULMONARY-INSUFFICIENCY THROUGH CONTRAST ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
    JOST, M
    LU, Z
    HOFFMANN, A
    BURCKHARDT, D
    SCHWEIZERISCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1982, 112 (45) : 1625 - 1626