Instruments that measure psychosocial factors related to vaccination: a scoping review protocol

被引:3
|
作者
Kaufman, Jessica [1 ]
Ryan, Rebecca [1 ]
Betsch, Cornelia [2 ]
Parkhill, Anne [1 ]
Shapiro, Gilla [3 ]
Leask, Julie [4 ,5 ]
Menning, Lisa [6 ]
Tugwell, Peter [7 ]
Costa, Daniel S. J. [8 ]
Danchin, Margaret [9 ]
Rada, Gabriel [10 ,11 ]
Hill, Sophie [1 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Psychol & Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Commun & Participat, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Erfurt, Fac Philosophy, Hlth Commun, Erfurt, Germany
[3] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Support Care, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Fac Nursing, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[6] World Hlth Org, Immunizat Vaccines & Biol, Geneva, GE, Switzerland
[7] Univ Ottawa, Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Sydney, Pain Management Res Inst, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[9] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Vaccine & Immunisat Res Grp, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[10] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Evidence Based Healthcare Program, Santiago, Chile
[11] Epistemonikos, Santiago, Chile
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 12期
关键词
evaluation; immunisation; instrument; measurement; vaccination; validation;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033938
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction As vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks increase, there is growing international interest in monitoring public attitudes towards vaccination and implementing and evaluating vaccine promotion interventions. Outcome selection and measurement are central to intervention evaluation. Measuring uptake rates alone cannot determine which elements in a multicomponent vaccine-promotion intervention are most effective, why specific populations are undervaccinated or when confidence in vaccines is wavering. To develop targeted and cost-effective interventions and policies, it is necessary to measure vaccination-related psychosocial factors such as knowledge, attitudes and aspects of decision-making. This scoping review aims to identify, compare and summarise the properties and validation of instruments for measuring vaccination-related psychosocial factors and identify gaps where no instruments exist. Methods and analysis We will search Medline OVID, Embase OVID, CINAHL and PsycINFO with no date restriction, using a pilot-tested search strategy of terms related to vaccination: knowledge, attitudes, trust, acceptance and decision-making and measurement, psychometric testing or validation. This search will be supplemented with manual search and expert consultation. We will include studies that describe instrument development, adaptation or testing and include evaluation of at least two measurement properties (eg, content, criterion, or construct validity; testretest reliability; internal consistency; sensitivity; responsiveness). Instruments measuring a vaccination-related psychosocial factor in any population will be included. All studies will be screened by one reviewer, with a sample double-screened to confirm accuracy. Disagreements will be resolved with a third reviewer. Data will be synthesised narratively and through summary tables to chart and compare instrument characteristics such as factors measured, date and/or location of development or validation, measurement properties evaluated and population. Ethics and dissemination This scoping review aims to provide an overview of existing instruments and ascertain measurement gaps where no measurement instruments currently exist. The identified instruments will form the basis of an open-access online repository of instruments.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Instruments to measure postintensive care syndrome: a scoping review protocol
    Chu, Yuan
    Timmins, Fiona
    Thompson, David
    Eustace-Cook, Jessica
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [2] Instruments to Measure Patient Satisfaction with Comprehensive Medication Management Services: A Scoping Review Protocol
    Resende, Lorayne Caroline
    do Nascimento, Mariana Martins Gonzaga
    Barbosa, Mariana Michel
    Rezende, Cristiane de Paula
    Pantuzza, Lais Lessa Neiva
    Reis, Edna Afonso
    [J]. PHARMACY, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [3] Instruments to measure medication literacy: A scoping review
    Pantuzza, Lais L. N.
    do Nascimento, Elizabeth
    Botelho, Stephanie F.
    Martins, Maria Auxiliadora P.
    Reis, Adriano M. M.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 185 - 185
  • [4] Breastfeeding assessment and management instruments: a scoping review protocol
    Souza, Joyce Wadna Rodrigues
    Silva, Janiny Lima
    Camara, Saionara Maria Aires
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [5] Psychosocial rehabilitation of individuals with schizophrenia: a scoping review protocol
    Oyelade, Oyeyemi Olajumoke
    Nkosi-Mafutha, Nokuthula Gloria
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [6] Psychosocial rehabilitation of individuals with schizophrenia: a scoping review protocol
    Oyeyemi Olajumoke Oyelade
    Nokuthula Gloria Nkosi-Mafutha
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [7] Scoping review protocol: the use of telemedicine in providing opioid agonist treatment and related psychosocial supports
    Crowley, Des
    Homeniuk, Robyn
    Delargy, Ide
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [8] Wheelchair outcome measurement instruments for children: a scoping review protocol
    Curi, Haidar Tafner
    Ferretti, Eliana Chaves
    de Soarez, Patricia Coelho
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2024,
  • [9] Instruments for measuring nursing research competence: a protocol for a scoping review
    Chen, Qirong
    Huang, Chongmei
    Castro, Aimee R.
    Tang, Siyuan
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [10] Scoping review of the psychosocial aspects of infertility in developing countries: protocol
    Salie, Mariam
    Roomaney, Rizwana
    Andipatin, Michelle
    Volks, Cal
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (05):