Wheelchair outcome measurement instruments for children: a scoping review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Curi, Haidar Tafner [1 ]
Ferretti, Eliana Chaves [2 ]
de Soarez, Patricia Coelho [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Dept Med Prevent, Av Dr Arnaldo 455, BR-01246903 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ciencias Movimento Humano, Santos, SP, Brazil
关键词
Disabled children; wheelchairs; assistive technology; outcome assessment; review; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; COSMIN; PARTICIPATION; GUIDELINE;
D O I
10.1080/17483107.2024.2319278
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose: The proposed scoping review aims to explore and map wheelchair outcome measurement instruments for children in the literature. Method: The proposed scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. The review question and eligibility criteria were developed using the PCC (population, concept, context) mnemonic as follows: (P) children manual or motorised wheelchair users (aged <= 18 years), (C) wheelchair outcome measurement instruments, (C) primary sources of literature. The search will be conducted in nine relevant electronic databases. including grey literature from Academic Google. Study screening, selection, and data extraction will be performed independently by two authors. A third reviewer will resolve discrepancies between the authors. General characteristics, population, feasibility, interpretability data will be extracted in accordance with the COSMIN methodology (Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments). This will encompass data pertaining to the measurement properties of the domains of reliability, validity and responsiveness. A descriptive analysis will be carried out, and the results will be classified into categories and presented in tables accompanied by a descriptive summary. Results: The results can inform future research directions, clinical practice and the development of wheelchair outcome measurement instruments. Furthermore, it will help professionals in rehabilitation and wheelchair services to find the wheelchair outcome measurement instruments according to the target population and cultural context. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION This review has the potential to enhance understanding of wheelchair outcome measurement instruments, thereby enabling rehabilitation professionals to assess the impact and progress of wheelchair use within the target population. The findings related to measurement properties may guide future research in the field of wheelchair outcome measurement instruments. Additionally it will assist clinical professionals in identifying appropriate wheelchair outcome measurement instruments based on the target population and cultural context
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes and outcome measurement instruments reported in randomised controlled trials of anxiety disorder treatments in children and adolescents: a scoping review protocol
    Patton, Megan C.
    Desai, Riddhi
    Noureddine, Yasmine
    Prebeg, Matthew J.
    Krause, Karolin Rose
    Vohra, Sunita
    Butcher, Nancy J.
    Monga, Suneeta
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [2] Measurement instruments for quantifying physical resilience in aging: a scoping review protocol
    Peters, Sue
    Cosco, Theodore D.
    Mackey, Dawn C.
    Sarohia, Gurkaran S.
    Leong, Jeffrey
    Wister, Andrew
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (1)
  • [3] Measurement instruments for quantifying physical resilience in aging: a scoping review protocol
    Sue Peters
    Theodore D. Cosco
    Dawn C. Mackey
    Gurkaran S. Sarohia
    Jeffrey Leong
    Andrew Wister
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 8
  • [4] Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Tinnitus Outcome Measurement Instruments-A Scoping Review
    Langguth, Berthold
    De Ridder, Dirk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (22)
  • [5] Evaluating Conversational Agents for Mental Health: Scoping Review of Outcomes and Outcome Measurement Instruments
    Jabir, Ahmad Ishqi
    Martinengo, Laura
    Lin, Xiaowen
    Torous, John
    Subramaniam, Mythily
    Car, Lorainne Tudor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [6] Patient-reported outcome instruments for assessing the involvement of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in their treatment: a scoping review protocol
    Lassen, Rikke Bjerre
    Abild, Caroline Bruun
    Kristensen, Kurt
    Kristensen, Lene Juel
    Jensen, Annesofie Lunde
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2023, 21 (03) : 609 - 616
  • [7] OUTCOME MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS FOR SAFETY IN RHEUMATOLOGY: A SCOPING REVIEW OF AVAILABLE INSTRUMENTS TO INFORM THE OMERACT SAFETY WORKING GROUP
    Klokker, L.
    Woodworth, T.
    Furst, D. E.
    Tugwell, P.
    Devoe, D.
    Williamson, P.
    Terwee, C. B.
    Suarez-Almazor, M. E.
    Strand, V.
    Leong, A. L.
    Goel, N.
    Boers, M.
    Brooks, P. M.
    Simon, L. S.
    Christensen, R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2017, 76 : 463 - 463
  • [8] Breastfeeding assessment and management instruments: a scoping review protocol
    Souza, Joyce Wadna Rodrigues
    Silva, Janiny Lima
    Camara, Saionara Maria Aires
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [9] Protocol of a scoping review of outcome domains in dermatology
    Nadir, Umer
    Ahmed, Areeba
    Yi, Michael D.
    Hisham, Farhana Ikmal
    Dave, Loma
    Kottner, Jan
    Ezzedine, K.
    Garg, Amit
    Ingram, John R.
    Jemec, Gregor Borut Ernst
    Spuls, Phyllis, I
    Kirkham, Jamie J.
    Cahn, Brian
    Alam, Murad
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [10] A protocol for a scoping review of equity measurement in mental health care for children and youth
    William Gardner
    Stuart G. Nicholls
    Graham J. Reid
    Brian Hutton
    Candyce Hamel
    Lindsey Sikora
    Mina Salamatmanesh
    Laura Duncan
    Katholiki Georgiades
    Jason Gilliland
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 9