Instruments that measure psychosocial factors related to vaccination: a scoping review protocol

被引:3
|
作者
Kaufman, Jessica [1 ]
Ryan, Rebecca [1 ]
Betsch, Cornelia [2 ]
Parkhill, Anne [1 ]
Shapiro, Gilla [3 ]
Leask, Julie [4 ,5 ]
Menning, Lisa [6 ]
Tugwell, Peter [7 ]
Costa, Daniel S. J. [8 ]
Danchin, Margaret [9 ]
Rada, Gabriel [10 ,11 ]
Hill, Sophie [1 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Psychol & Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Commun & Participat, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Erfurt, Fac Philosophy, Hlth Commun, Erfurt, Germany
[3] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Support Care, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Fac Nursing, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[6] World Hlth Org, Immunizat Vaccines & Biol, Geneva, GE, Switzerland
[7] Univ Ottawa, Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Sydney, Pain Management Res Inst, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[9] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Vaccine & Immunisat Res Grp, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[10] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Evidence Based Healthcare Program, Santiago, Chile
[11] Epistemonikos, Santiago, Chile
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 12期
关键词
evaluation; immunisation; instrument; measurement; vaccination; validation;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033938
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction As vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks increase, there is growing international interest in monitoring public attitudes towards vaccination and implementing and evaluating vaccine promotion interventions. Outcome selection and measurement are central to intervention evaluation. Measuring uptake rates alone cannot determine which elements in a multicomponent vaccine-promotion intervention are most effective, why specific populations are undervaccinated or when confidence in vaccines is wavering. To develop targeted and cost-effective interventions and policies, it is necessary to measure vaccination-related psychosocial factors such as knowledge, attitudes and aspects of decision-making. This scoping review aims to identify, compare and summarise the properties and validation of instruments for measuring vaccination-related psychosocial factors and identify gaps where no instruments exist. Methods and analysis We will search Medline OVID, Embase OVID, CINAHL and PsycINFO with no date restriction, using a pilot-tested search strategy of terms related to vaccination: knowledge, attitudes, trust, acceptance and decision-making and measurement, psychometric testing or validation. This search will be supplemented with manual search and expert consultation. We will include studies that describe instrument development, adaptation or testing and include evaluation of at least two measurement properties (eg, content, criterion, or construct validity; testretest reliability; internal consistency; sensitivity; responsiveness). Instruments measuring a vaccination-related psychosocial factor in any population will be included. All studies will be screened by one reviewer, with a sample double-screened to confirm accuracy. Disagreements will be resolved with a third reviewer. Data will be synthesised narratively and through summary tables to chart and compare instrument characteristics such as factors measured, date and/or location of development or validation, measurement properties evaluated and population. Ethics and dissemination This scoping review aims to provide an overview of existing instruments and ascertain measurement gaps where no measurement instruments currently exist. The identified instruments will form the basis of an open-access online repository of instruments.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Psychosocial outcomes for adults with spina bifida: a scoping review protocol
    Betz, Cecily L.
    Smith, Kathryn A.
    Kysh, Lynn
    Roland, Michele
    Van Speybroeck, Alexander
    Castillo, Patricia
    Liley, Fasha
    Hudson, Sharon
    Mannino, Jennifer E.
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2020, 18 (05) : 1135 - 1143
  • [12] Instruments for measuring incidents related to patient safety in the context of paediatric intensive care—protocol for a scoping review
    Helga Catarina Santos Alves de Oliveira
    Ricardo Rafael Marques
    Maria Alice dos Santos Curado
    Maria Filomena Mendes Gaspar
    Paulo Jorge dos Santos Sousa
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [13] Instruments to measure post-intensive care syndrome: A scoping review
    Chu, Yuan
    Thompson, David R.
    Eustace-Cook, Jessica
    Timmins, Fiona
    [J]. NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 28 (04) : 484 - 498
  • [14] Instruments in general practice to identify and to measure (over)burden due to informal care for caring relatives: a scoping review protocol
    Marx, Yvonne
    Bauer, Alexander
    Unverzagt, Susanne
    Stark, Undine
    Frese, Thomas
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [15] Measurement instruments for quantifying physical resilience in aging: a scoping review protocol
    Peters, Sue
    Cosco, Theodore D.
    Mackey, Dawn C.
    Sarohia, Gurkaran S.
    Leong, Jeffrey
    Wister, Andrew
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (1)
  • [16] Measurement instruments for quantifying physical resilience in aging: a scoping review protocol
    Sue Peters
    Theodore D. Cosco
    Dawn C. Mackey
    Gurkaran S. Sarohia
    Jeffrey Leong
    Andrew Wister
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 8
  • [17] Instruments and indicators for assessing organisational food environments: a scoping review protocol
    de Azevedo, Ana Beatriz Coelho
    Curioni, Cintia Chaves
    Bandoni, Daniel Henrique
    Canella, Daniela Silva
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [18] Feasibility, acceptance and factors related to the implementation of telemedicine in rural areas: A scoping review protocol
    Al Aufa, Badra
    Nurfikri, Ari
    Mardiati, Wiwiet
    Sancoko, Sancoko
    Yuliyanto, Heri
    Nurmansyah, Mochamad Iqbal
    Arumsari, Imas
    Koire, Ibrahim Isa
    [J]. DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 9
  • [19] Psychosocial interventions addressing suicidality in inpatient psychiatry: a scoping review protocol
    Olarte-Godoy, Jennifer
    Jack, Susan M.
    Campbell, Kaitryn
    Halladay, Jillian
    Cleverley, Kristin
    McGillion, Michael
    Links, Paul
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2023, 21 (05) : 1034 - 1042
  • [20] Psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions for methamphetamine addiction: protocol for a scoping review of the literature
    C. Hamel
    K. Corace
    M. Hersi
    D. Rice
    M. Willows
    P. Macpherson
    B. Sproule
    J. Flores-Aranda
    G. Garber
    L. Esmaeilisaraji
    B. Skidmore
    A. Porath
    R. Ortiz Nunez
    B. Hutton
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 9