Minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomy: Clinical and oncological outcomes at a single institute

被引:14
|
作者
Koie, T. [1 ]
Yamamoto, H. [1 ]
Hatakeyama, S. [1 ]
Kudoh, S. [1 ]
Yoneyama, T. [1 ]
Hashimoto, Y. [1 ]
Kamimura, N. [1 ]
Ohyama, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hirosaki Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Hirosaki, Aomori 0368562, Japan
来源
EJSO | 2011年 / 37卷 / 09期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Minimum incision endoscopic surgery; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; MORBIDITY; SERIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2011.06.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical and oncological outcomes of prostatectomy patients undergoing minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomy (MIE-RP). Methods: Between September 2005 and May 2010, 541 patients underwent MIE-RP with bilateral lymphadenectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer at Hirosaki University Hospital. The present retrospective study enrolled 375 patients who had not received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. MIE-RP was performed through a 6-cm suprapubic midline incision. A 30 laparoscope was conveniently positioned on the head side of the patient for precise observation and monitoring. Results: The median operating time was 119 min, and the estimated blood loss was 900 ml. The most frequent perioperative complication was leakage from the vesicourethral anastomosis (6.7%), and rectal injury occurred in 1.0%. Overall, 31.2% of the patients had a positive surgical margin, including 11.1% with pT2, 52.9% with pT3 and 100% with pT4 diseases. The post-operative median follow-up period was 40.5 months (range, 2-56.5 months). The 5-year PSA-free survival rate was 71.6%. In multivariate analysis, high-risk patients (according to the D'Amico risk criteria), pathological T stage and positive surgical margins were identified as independent predictors of PSA-free survival. The limitations of this study included a retrospective study, relatively short follow-up period and single-institution nature of the study. Conclusions: MIE-RP is a safe and minimally invasive procedure that may represent a reliable alternative to laparoscopic and robotic-assisted RP. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 810
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Influences of Surgical Volume on Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy
    Pohle, Margit
    Magheli, Ahmed
    Fischer, Tom
    Ralla, Bernhard
    Miller, Kurt
    Hinz, Stefan
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2018, 101 (03) : 256 - 262
  • [42] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional outcomes following fellowship training
    Gianduzzo, T. R. J.
    Chabert, C.
    Osgood, L.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 : 26 - 26
  • [43] Radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer: Functional and oncological outcomes
    Aslam, A.
    Kiely, S.
    Wallis, F.
    Durkan, G. C.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 : 32 - 32
  • [44] Robotic radical prostatectomy-continence and oncological outcomes in 707 cases
    Goonewardene, S.
    Cahill, D.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 : 88 - 88
  • [45] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes
    Boylu, Ugur
    Basatac, Cem
    Turan, Turgay
    Onol, Fikret Fatih
    Gumus, Eyup
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 38 (01): : 8 - 13
  • [46] Lymphovascular Invasion at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy Adversely Impacts Oncological Outcomes
    Sathianathen, Niranjan J.
    Furrer, Marc A.
    Mulholland, Clancy J.
    Katsios, Andreas
    Soliman, Christopher
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Peters, Justin S.
    Zargar, Homi
    Costello, Anthony J.
    Hovens, Christopher M.
    Bishop, Conrad
    Rao, Ranjit
    Tong, Raymond
    Steiner, Daniel
    Moon, Daniel
    Thomas, Benjamin C.
    Dundee, Philip
    Calero, Jose Antonio Rodriguez
    Thalmann, George N.
    Corcoran, Niall M.
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [47] Oncological, functional and perioperative outcomes in transplant patients after radical prostatectomy
    Beyer, Burkhard
    Mandel, Philipp
    Michl, Uwe
    Pompe, Raisa S.
    Veleva, Valia
    Steuber, Thomas
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Tilki, Derya
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (08) : 1101 - 1105
  • [48] Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 and Oncological Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy
    Hashine, Katsuyoshi
    Yuasa, Akihito
    Shinomori, Kensuke
    Shirato, Akitomi
    Ninomiya, Iku
    Teramoto, Norihiro
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 41 (04) : 571 - 576
  • [49] Midterm oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy (RP)
    Wirth, Gregory J.
    Psutka, Sarah P.
    Chapin, Brian F.
    Wu, Shulin
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    Dahl, Douglas M.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 112 (02) : 190 - 197
  • [50] Salvage radical prostatectomy following focal therapy: functional and oncological outcomes
    Herrera-Caceres, Jaime O.
    Nason, Gregory J.
    Salgado-Sanmamed, Noelia
    Goldberg, Hanan
    Woon, Dixon T. S.
    Chandrasekar, Thenappen
    Ajib, Khaled
    Tan, Guan Hee
    Alhunaidi, Omar
    van der Kwast, Theodorus
    Finelli, Antonio
    Zlotta, Alexandre R.
    Hamilton, Robert J.
    Berlin, Alejandro
    Perlis, Nathan
    Fleshner, Neil E.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 125 (04) : 525 - 530