Minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomy: Clinical and oncological outcomes at a single institute

被引:14
|
作者
Koie, T. [1 ]
Yamamoto, H. [1 ]
Hatakeyama, S. [1 ]
Kudoh, S. [1 ]
Yoneyama, T. [1 ]
Hashimoto, Y. [1 ]
Kamimura, N. [1 ]
Ohyama, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hirosaki Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Hirosaki, Aomori 0368562, Japan
来源
EJSO | 2011年 / 37卷 / 09期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Minimum incision endoscopic surgery; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; MORBIDITY; SERIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2011.06.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical and oncological outcomes of prostatectomy patients undergoing minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomy (MIE-RP). Methods: Between September 2005 and May 2010, 541 patients underwent MIE-RP with bilateral lymphadenectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer at Hirosaki University Hospital. The present retrospective study enrolled 375 patients who had not received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. MIE-RP was performed through a 6-cm suprapubic midline incision. A 30 laparoscope was conveniently positioned on the head side of the patient for precise observation and monitoring. Results: The median operating time was 119 min, and the estimated blood loss was 900 ml. The most frequent perioperative complication was leakage from the vesicourethral anastomosis (6.7%), and rectal injury occurred in 1.0%. Overall, 31.2% of the patients had a positive surgical margin, including 11.1% with pT2, 52.9% with pT3 and 100% with pT4 diseases. The post-operative median follow-up period was 40.5 months (range, 2-56.5 months). The 5-year PSA-free survival rate was 71.6%. In multivariate analysis, high-risk patients (according to the D'Amico risk criteria), pathological T stage and positive surgical margins were identified as independent predictors of PSA-free survival. The limitations of this study included a retrospective study, relatively short follow-up period and single-institution nature of the study. Conclusions: MIE-RP is a safe and minimally invasive procedure that may represent a reliable alternative to laparoscopic and robotic-assisted RP. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 810
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: continence and oncological outcomes in 268 cases
    S. S. Goonewardene
    D. Cahill
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2015, 9 (3) : 267 - 267
  • [32] Blood loss during radical prostatectomy: impact on clinical, oncological and functional outcomes and complication rates
    Djavan, Bob
    Agalliu, Ilir
    Laze, Juliana
    Sadri, Helen
    Kazzazi, Amir
    Lepor, Herbert
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (01) : 69 - 75
  • [33] South African single surgeon experience: Comparison of oncological outcomes, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open perineal radical prostatectomy
    Dlamini, Khayalethu C. S.
    Coetzee, Lance J.
    Mathabe, Kgomotso
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2025,
  • [34] Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE) - Oncological and functional results of 1300 procedures
    Rabenalt, Robert
    Do, Minh
    Truss, Michael C.
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A65 - A65
  • [35] COMPARISON OF PATHOLOGICAL AND ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES OF MEN ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE PROGRESSING TO RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH A MATCHED COHORT OF MEN UNDERGOING IMMEDIATE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN A SINGLE INSTITUTION
    Aning, Jonathan
    Zargar, Homayoun
    Black, Peter
    So, Alan
    Goldenberg, Larry
    Gleave, Martin
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E720 - E720
  • [36] Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy:: Oncological and functional results after 700 procedures
    Stolzenburg, JU
    Rabenalt, R
    Do, M
    Ho, K
    Dorschner, W
    Waldkirch, E
    Jonas, U
    Schütz, A
    Horn, L
    Truss, MC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (04): : 1271 - 1275
  • [37] Comparison of pathological and oncological outcomes of men on active surveillance progressing to radical prostatectomy with a matched cohort of men undergoing immediate radical prostatectomy in a single institution
    Aning, J.
    Zargar, H.
    Black, P.
    So, A.
    Goldenberg, L.
    Gleave, M.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 : 46 - 46
  • [38] Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE) - Oncological and functional results of 1200 procedures
    Rabenalt, R.
    Do, M.
    Truss, M. C.
    Liatsikos, E.
    Dietel, A.
    Stolzenburg, J. U.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 6 (02) : 211 - 211
  • [39] Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Hruza, Marcel
    Bermejo, Justo Lorenzo
    Flinspach, Bettina
    Schulze, Michael
    Teber, Dogu
    Rumpelt, Hans Joachim
    Rassweiler, Jens Jochen
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (02) : 271 - 280
  • [40] The functional and oncological outcomes of 242 cases of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Srinualnad, Sittiporn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 : A127 - A127