Minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomy: Clinical and oncological outcomes at a single institute

被引:14
|
作者
Koie, T. [1 ]
Yamamoto, H. [1 ]
Hatakeyama, S. [1 ]
Kudoh, S. [1 ]
Yoneyama, T. [1 ]
Hashimoto, Y. [1 ]
Kamimura, N. [1 ]
Ohyama, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hirosaki Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Hirosaki, Aomori 0368562, Japan
来源
EJSO | 2011年 / 37卷 / 09期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Minimum incision endoscopic surgery; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; MORBIDITY; SERIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2011.06.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical and oncological outcomes of prostatectomy patients undergoing minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomy (MIE-RP). Methods: Between September 2005 and May 2010, 541 patients underwent MIE-RP with bilateral lymphadenectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer at Hirosaki University Hospital. The present retrospective study enrolled 375 patients who had not received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. MIE-RP was performed through a 6-cm suprapubic midline incision. A 30 laparoscope was conveniently positioned on the head side of the patient for precise observation and monitoring. Results: The median operating time was 119 min, and the estimated blood loss was 900 ml. The most frequent perioperative complication was leakage from the vesicourethral anastomosis (6.7%), and rectal injury occurred in 1.0%. Overall, 31.2% of the patients had a positive surgical margin, including 11.1% with pT2, 52.9% with pT3 and 100% with pT4 diseases. The post-operative median follow-up period was 40.5 months (range, 2-56.5 months). The 5-year PSA-free survival rate was 71.6%. In multivariate analysis, high-risk patients (according to the D'Amico risk criteria), pathological T stage and positive surgical margins were identified as independent predictors of PSA-free survival. The limitations of this study included a retrospective study, relatively short follow-up period and single-institution nature of the study. Conclusions: MIE-RP is a safe and minimally invasive procedure that may represent a reliable alternative to laparoscopic and robotic-assisted RP. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 810
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimum incision endoscopic radical cystectomy in patients with malignant tumors of the urinary bladder: Clinical and oncological outcomes at a single institution
    Koie, T.
    Ohyama, C.
    Yamamoto, H.
    Hatakeyama, S.
    Kudoh, S.
    Yoneyama, T.
    Hashimoto, Y.
    Kamimura, N.
    EJSO, 2012, 38 (11): : 1101 - 1105
  • [2] Radical Prostatectomy Oncological Outcomes
    Hammad, Fayez T.
    RECENT ADVANCES IN CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 1138 : 267 - 277
  • [3] Neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by robot-assisted and minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: comparison of perioperative and oncological outcomes at single institution
    Naoki Fujita
    Takuya Koie
    Yasuhiro Hashimoto
    Takuma Narita
    Yuki Tobisawa
    Toshikazu Tanaka
    Daisuke Noro
    Masaaki Oikawa
    Kazuhisa Hagiwara
    Tohru Yoneyama
    Atsushi Imai
    Hayato Yamamoto
    Shingo Hatakeyama
    Takahiro Yoneyama
    Chikara Ohyama
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2018, 50 : 1999 - 2005
  • [4] Neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by robot-assisted and minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: comparison of perioperative and oncological outcomes at single institution
    Fujita, Naoki
    Koie, Takuya
    Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
    Narita, Takuma
    Tobisawa, Yuki
    Tanaka, Toshikazu
    Noro, Daisuke
    Oikawa, Masaaki
    Hagiwara, Kazuhisa
    Yoneyama, Tohru
    Imai, Atsushi
    Yamamoto, Hayato
    Hatakeyama, Shingo
    Yoneyama, Takahiro
    Ohyama, Chikara
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 50 (11) : 1999 - 2005
  • [5] Prospective comparative study of single intravenous versus single oral administration of antimicrobial prophylaxis in minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Kobayashi, K. T.
    Sakura, M. S.
    Kawakami, S. K.
    Yoshida, S. Y.
    Tatokoro, M. T.
    Yokoyama, M. Y.
    Sakai, Y. S.
    Koga, F. K.
    Saito, K. S.
    Fujii, Y. F.
    Kihara, K. K.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 322 - 322
  • [6] Minimum Incision Endoscopic Surgery (MIES) in Japanese Urology: Results of Adrenalectomy, Radical Nephrectomy and Radical Prostatectomy
    Kihara, K.
    Kobayashi, T.
    Kawakami, S.
    Fujii, Y.
    Kageyama, Y.
    Masuda, H.
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2010, 41 : S15 - S19
  • [7] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: comparison of oncological outcomes at a single center
    Okegawa, Takatsugu
    Omura, Shota
    Samejima, Mio
    Ninomiya, Naoki
    Taguchi, Satoru
    Nakamura, Yu
    Yamaguchi, Tsuyoshi
    Tambo, Mitsuhiro
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 8 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [8] Portless endoscopic radical nephrectomy via a single minimum incision in 80 patients
    Kihara, K
    Kageyama, Y
    Yano, M
    Kobayashi, T
    Kawakami, S
    Fujii, Y
    Masuda, H
    Hyochi, N
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 11 (09) : 714 - 720
  • [9] Oncological outcome of minimum incision endoscopic radical nephrectomy for pathologically organ confined renal cell carcinoma
    Iimura, Yasumasa
    Kihara, Kazunori
    Saito, Kazutaka
    Masuda, Hitoshi
    Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi
    Kawakami, Satoru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 15 (01) : 44 - 47
  • [10] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and oncological outcomes
    Rassweiler, J
    Schulze, M
    Teber, D
    Seemann, O
    Frede, T
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2004, 14 (02) : 75 - 82