Bayesian optimal interval design for phase I oncology clinical trials

被引:3
|
作者
Fellman, Bryan M. [1 ]
Yuan, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Houston, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
STATA JOURNAL | 2015年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
st0372; optinterval; Bayesian optimal interval; phase I clinical trial design; maximum tolerated dose; operating characteristic;
D O I
10.1177/1536867X1501500107
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design is a novel phase I trial design for finding the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). With the BOIN design, phase I trials are conducted as a sequence of decision-making steps for assigning an appropriate dose for each enrolled patient. The design optimizes the assignment of doses to patients by minimizing incorrect decisions of dose escalation or deescalation; that is, it decreases the chance of erroneously escalating or de-escalating the dose when the current dose is higher or lower than the MTD. This feature of the BOIN design strongly ensures adherence to ethical standards. The most prominent advantage of the BOIN design is that it simultaneously achieves design simplicity and superior performance in comparison with similar methods. The BOIN design can be implemented in a simple way that is similar to the 3 3 design, but it yields substantially better operating characteristics. Compared with the well-known continual reassessment method, the BOIN design yields average performance when selecting the MTD, but it has a substantially lower risk of assigning patients to subtherapeutic or overly toxic doses. In this article, we present a command (optinterval) for implementing the BOIN design in a phase I clinical trial setting.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 120
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal one-stage design and analysis for efficacy expansion in Phase I oncology trials
    Wu, Cai
    Liu, Fang
    Zhou, Heng
    Wu, Xiaoqiang
    Chen, Cong
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 18 (06) : 673 - 680
  • [32] Checkerboard: a Bayesian efficacy and toxicity interval design for phase I/II dose-finding trials
    Yin, Jun
    Yuan, Ying
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2020, 30 (06) : 1006 - 1025
  • [33] A robust Bayesian dose-finding design for phase I/II clinical trials
    Liu, Suyu
    Johnson, Valen E.
    BIOSTATISTICS, 2016, 17 (02) : 249 - 263
  • [34] Bayesian optimal interval design for dose finding in drug-combination trials
    Lin, Ruitao
    Yin, Guosheng
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (05) : 2155 - 2167
  • [35] Optimal, minimax and admissible two-stage design for phase II oncology clinical trials
    Fei Qin
    Jingwei Wu
    Feng Chen
    Yongyue Wei
    Yang Zhao
    Zhiwei Jiang
    Jianling Bai
    Hao Yu
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20
  • [36] Optimal, minimax and admissible two-stage design for phase II oncology clinical trials
    Qin, Fei
    Wu, Jingwei
    Chen, Feng
    Wei, Yongyue
    Zhao, Yang
    Jiang, Zhiwei
    Bai, Jianling
    Yu, Hao
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [37] An optimal Bayesian predictive probability design for phase II clinical trials with simple and complicated endpoints
    Guo, Beibei
    Liu, Suyu
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 62 (02) : 339 - 349
  • [38] BAYESIAN PHASE I/II ADAPTIVELY RANDOMIZED ONCOLOGY TRIALS WITH COMBINED DRUGS
    Yuan, By Ying
    Yin, Guosheng
    ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2011, 5 (2A): : 924 - 942
  • [39] Phase I clinical trials in oncology: a moral dilemma for the investigators
    Seligmann, M
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 2003, 32 (04): : 147 - 148
  • [40] Evaluation of Patient Enrollment in Oncology Phase I Clinical Trials
    van der Biessen, Diane A. J.
    Cranendonk, Merlijn A.
    Schiavon, Gaia
    van der Holt, Bronno
    Wiemer, Erik A. C.
    Eskens, Ferry A. L. M.
    Verweij, Jaap
    de Jonge, Maja J. A.
    Mathijssen, Ron H. J.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2013, 18 (03): : 323 - 329