Bayesian optimal interval design for phase I oncology clinical trials

被引:3
|
作者
Fellman, Bryan M. [1 ]
Yuan, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Houston, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
STATA JOURNAL | 2015年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
st0372; optinterval; Bayesian optimal interval; phase I clinical trial design; maximum tolerated dose; operating characteristic;
D O I
10.1177/1536867X1501500107
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design is a novel phase I trial design for finding the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). With the BOIN design, phase I trials are conducted as a sequence of decision-making steps for assigning an appropriate dose for each enrolled patient. The design optimizes the assignment of doses to patients by minimizing incorrect decisions of dose escalation or deescalation; that is, it decreases the chance of erroneously escalating or de-escalating the dose when the current dose is higher or lower than the MTD. This feature of the BOIN design strongly ensures adherence to ethical standards. The most prominent advantage of the BOIN design is that it simultaneously achieves design simplicity and superior performance in comparison with similar methods. The BOIN design can be implemented in a simple way that is similar to the 3 3 design, but it yields substantially better operating characteristics. Compared with the well-known continual reassessment method, the BOIN design yields average performance when selecting the MTD, but it has a substantially lower risk of assigning patients to subtherapeutic or overly toxic doses. In this article, we present a command (optinterval) for implementing the BOIN design in a phase I clinical trial setting.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 120
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A web application for optimal selection of adaptive designs in phase I oncology clinical trials
    Chen, Sheau-Chiann
    Shyr, Yu
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [22] Uniformly most powerful Bayesian interval design for phase I dose-finding trials
    Lin, Ruitao
    Yin, Guosheng
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2018, 17 (06) : 710 - 724
  • [23] Bayesian optimal design for phase II screening trials
    Ding, Meichun
    Rosner, Gary L.
    Mueller, Peter
    BIOMETRICS, 2008, 64 (03) : 886 - 894
  • [24] Constrained Bayesian optimal designs for phase I clinical trials: Continuous dose space
    Rosenberger, WF
    Haines, LM
    Perevozskaya, I
    MODA6 ADVANCES IN MODEL-ORIENTED DESIGN AND ANALYSIS, 2001, : 225 - 233
  • [25] Adaptive Cohort Size Determination Method for Bayesian Optimal Interval Phase I/II Design to Shorten Clinical Trial Duration
    Kojima, Masahiro
    JCO PRECISION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 7
  • [26] Evaluation of Enrollment in Oncology Phase I Clinical Trials
    van der Biessen, A. J.
    Cranendonk, M. A.
    van der Holt, B.
    Verweij, J.
    de Jonge, M. J. A.
    Mathijssen, R. H. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S161 - S161
  • [27] Increasing complexity in oncology phase I clinical trials
    Malik, Laeeq
    Lu, David
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2019, 37 (03) : 519 - 523
  • [28] Participation of women in phase I oncology clinical trials
    Vidal, L.
    Berg, R.
    Yang, Z.
    Moss, K. R.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [29] Phase I clinical trials in oncology: Ethical issues
    Goldwasser, F
    THERAPIE, 2004, 59 (04): : 431 - 433
  • [30] Increasing complexity in oncology phase I clinical trials
    Laeeq Malik
    David Lu
    Investigational New Drugs, 2019, 37 : 519 - 523