Development and internal validation of a novel risk adjustment model for adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery: the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit risk model

被引:99
|
作者
Eugene, N. [1 ,2 ]
Oliver, C. M. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Bassett, M. G. [1 ,4 ]
Poulton, T. E. [1 ,4 ,6 ]
Kuryba, A. [1 ,2 ]
Johnston, C. [1 ,7 ]
Anderson, I. D. [1 ,8 ]
Moonesinghe, S. R. [1 ,5 ]
Grocott, M. P. [1 ,9 ,10 ]
Murray, D. M. [1 ,11 ]
Cromwell, D. A. [1 ,2 ,12 ]
Walker, K. [1 ,2 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Anaesthetists, Natl Emergency Laparot Audit, London, England
[2] Royal Coll Surgeons England, Clin Effectiveness Unit, London, England
[3] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London, England
[4] UCL, Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England
[5] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Anaesthesia & Perioperat Med, UCLH Surg Outcomes Res Ctr, London, England
[6] Northern Sch Anaesthesia & Intens Care Med, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[7] St George NHS Hosp, London, England
[8] Salford Royal Fdn NHS Trust, Salford, Lancs, England
[9] NIHR Biomed Res Ctr, Anaesthesia & Crit Care Res Grp, London, England
[10] Univ Hosp Southampton, Integrat Physiol & Crit Illness Grp, Fac Med, Southampton, Hants, England
[11] James Cook Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, England
[12] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, London, England
关键词
emergency laparotomy; postoperative mortality; risk adjustment; postoperative outcome; COLORECTAL SURGERY; MORTALITY; CANCER; MORBIDITY; OUTCOMES; POSSUM; SYSTEM; TOOLS; DEATH;
D O I
10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.026
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Among patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, 30-day postoperative mortality is around 10-15%. The risk of death among these patients, however, varies greatly because of their clinical characteristics. We developed a risk prediction model for 30-day postoperative mortality to enable better comparison of outcomes between hospitals. Methods: We analysed data from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) on patients having an emergency laparotomy between December 2013 and November 2015. A prediction model was developed using multivariable logistic regression, with potential risk factors identified from existing prediction models, national guidelines, and clinical experts. Continuous risk factors were transformed if necessary to reflect their non-linear relationship with 30-day mortality. The performance of the model was assessed in terms of its calibration and discrimination. Interval validation was conducted using bootstrap resampling. Results: There were 4458 (11.5%) deaths within 30-days among the 38 830 patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Variables associated with death included (among others): age, blood pressure, heart rate, physiological variables, malignancy, and ASA physical status classification. The predicted risk of death among patients ranged from 1% to 50%. The model demonstrated excellent calibration and discrimination, with a C-statistic of 0.863 (95% confidence interval, 0.858-0.867). The model retained its high discrimination during internal validation, with a bootstrap derived C-statistic of 0.861. Conclusions: The NELA risk prediction model for emergency laparotomies discriminates well between low-and high-risk patients and is suitable for producing risk-adjusted provider mortality statistics.
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 748
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] End-of-surgery care bundles for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy
    Kare, R.
    Dhillon, P.
    Griffiths, R.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 68 (06) : 664 - 664
  • [42] Risk assessment in emergency laparotomy for outcome prediction in patients presenting to the emergency department
    Raslan, Mohamed M.
    Elshayeb, Amr Y.
    Mashhour, Abdrabou N.
    Saleh, Mohamed M.
    Elbarmelgi, Mohamed Y.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 43 (03): : 1102 - 1111
  • [43] Identification of High Risk Patients from the Bedside - Analysis of 540 patients undergoing Emergency Laparotomy
    Campbell, M.
    Morton, B.
    Lester, V.
    Misra, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 : 39 - 40
  • [44] Development and validation of an EHR-based risk prediction model for geriatric patients undergoing urgent and emergency surgery
    Yap, Edward N.
    Huang, Jie
    Chiu, Joshua
    Chang, Robert W.
    Cohn, Bradley
    Hwang, Judith C. F.
    Reed, Mary
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2025, 25 (01):
  • [45] National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) cancer surgery: Is there a difference in outcome in the older population?
    Ertansel, Buket
    Nemeth, Kristof
    Ramirez, Cesar Brito
    Sharieff, Imran
    Arhi, Chanpreet
    Nikolopoulos, Ioannis
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 24 - 24
  • [46] Promoting risk scoring for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy at the busy district general hospital in London
    Shah, R.
    Bemand, T.
    Pittaway, H.
    Blackburn, T.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 74 : 24 - 24
  • [47] P-POSSUM poorly predicts risk of death in the sickest patients undergoing Emergency Laparotomy
    Rawstorne, E.
    McArthur, D. R.
    Bowley, D. M.
    Kailey, J.
    Gao, F.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 : 163 - 164
  • [48] A Comparison of the P-POSSUM and NELA Risk Score for Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy in Singapore
    Lai, C. P. T.
    Goo, T. T.
    Ong, M. W.
    Prakash, P. S.
    Lim, W. W.
    Drakeford, P. A.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 45 (08) : 2439 - 2446
  • [49] Senior involvement and critical care of emergency laparotomy patients in a medium-sized district general hospital: a review of National Emergency Laparotomy Audit data
    Braier-Lorimer, Darryl
    Wong, Will
    Abdelaziz, Nesma
    Shah, Raj
    ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 79 : 26 - 26
  • [50] Is Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT) a reliable predictor of outcome in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy?
    Ong, K.
    McIlveen, E.
    Edwards, J.
    Moug, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 : 39 - 39