Development and internal validation of a novel risk adjustment model for adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery: the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit risk model

被引:99
|
作者
Eugene, N. [1 ,2 ]
Oliver, C. M. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Bassett, M. G. [1 ,4 ]
Poulton, T. E. [1 ,4 ,6 ]
Kuryba, A. [1 ,2 ]
Johnston, C. [1 ,7 ]
Anderson, I. D. [1 ,8 ]
Moonesinghe, S. R. [1 ,5 ]
Grocott, M. P. [1 ,9 ,10 ]
Murray, D. M. [1 ,11 ]
Cromwell, D. A. [1 ,2 ,12 ]
Walker, K. [1 ,2 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Anaesthetists, Natl Emergency Laparot Audit, London, England
[2] Royal Coll Surgeons England, Clin Effectiveness Unit, London, England
[3] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London, England
[4] UCL, Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England
[5] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Anaesthesia & Perioperat Med, UCLH Surg Outcomes Res Ctr, London, England
[6] Northern Sch Anaesthesia & Intens Care Med, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[7] St George NHS Hosp, London, England
[8] Salford Royal Fdn NHS Trust, Salford, Lancs, England
[9] NIHR Biomed Res Ctr, Anaesthesia & Crit Care Res Grp, London, England
[10] Univ Hosp Southampton, Integrat Physiol & Crit Illness Grp, Fac Med, Southampton, Hants, England
[11] James Cook Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, England
[12] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, London, England
关键词
emergency laparotomy; postoperative mortality; risk adjustment; postoperative outcome; COLORECTAL SURGERY; MORTALITY; CANCER; MORBIDITY; OUTCOMES; POSSUM; SYSTEM; TOOLS; DEATH;
D O I
10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.026
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Among patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, 30-day postoperative mortality is around 10-15%. The risk of death among these patients, however, varies greatly because of their clinical characteristics. We developed a risk prediction model for 30-day postoperative mortality to enable better comparison of outcomes between hospitals. Methods: We analysed data from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) on patients having an emergency laparotomy between December 2013 and November 2015. A prediction model was developed using multivariable logistic regression, with potential risk factors identified from existing prediction models, national guidelines, and clinical experts. Continuous risk factors were transformed if necessary to reflect their non-linear relationship with 30-day mortality. The performance of the model was assessed in terms of its calibration and discrimination. Interval validation was conducted using bootstrap resampling. Results: There were 4458 (11.5%) deaths within 30-days among the 38 830 patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Variables associated with death included (among others): age, blood pressure, heart rate, physiological variables, malignancy, and ASA physical status classification. The predicted risk of death among patients ranged from 1% to 50%. The model demonstrated excellent calibration and discrimination, with a C-statistic of 0.863 (95% confidence interval, 0.858-0.867). The model retained its high discrimination during internal validation, with a bootstrap derived C-statistic of 0.861. Conclusions: The NELA risk prediction model for emergency laparotomies discriminates well between low-and high-risk patients and is suitable for producing risk-adjusted provider mortality statistics.
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 748
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] HAS (Hajibandeh Index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Status, and Sarcopenia) Model Versus NELA (National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) Score in Predicting the Risk of Mortality After Emergency Laparotomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Linganathan, Saranya
    Hughes, Ioan
    Saji, Alwin Puthiyakunnel
    Mitra, Kalyan
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [32] Assessment for the risk of malnutrition and nutritional support in older emergency laparotomy patients: a clinical audit
    Windle, Angela
    Nair, Sherena
    Ispoglou, Theocharis
    Burke, Dermot
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110
  • [33] Compliance with pre-operative National Emergency Laparotomy Audit score for emergency laparotomy patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Shah, P.
    Pitrola, K.
    Harris, A.
    Loader, L.
    Nayler, J.
    Shah, R.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 76 : 165 - 165
  • [34] Review of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit database: is there a higher mortality in out-of-hours emergency laparotomy patients with a mortality score of ≥ 5%
    Good, E.
    Rajamuni, M.
    Schofield, C.
    Sivanandan, I.
    Lee-Chadwick, H.
    Lumb, A.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 78 : 8 - 8
  • [35] An Audit of Geriatric Input and Analysis of The Barriers For Elderly Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy
    Govind, Garima
    Jayasankar, Balaji
    Difranco, Filippo
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [36] Management of sepsis in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: an audit of local NELA data
    Madden, G.
    Scase, A.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 : 87 - 87
  • [37] Improving Pre-operative Risk Score Assessment In Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy
    Patel, Maitreyi
    Thomas, Joel Joy
    Sarwary, Haschmatullah
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109
  • [38] The importance of critical care input in high-risk patients undergoing emergency laparotomy
    Fontaine, E.
    Irwin, K.
    Burtand, A.
    Pickford, A. M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 68 : 66 - 66
  • [39] Use of Pre-operative Risk and Frailty Assessment in patients undergoing Emergency Laparotomy
    Grant, Malika
    Gourrege, Anick
    Janjua, A. Z.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [40] Utility of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit prognostic model in predicting outcomes in an Australian health system
    Tran, Elizabeth T.
    Ho, Kwok M.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2023, 51 (01) : 51 - 58