Risk stratification after radical prostatectomy in men with pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer using volume-weighted mean nuclear volume

被引:5
|
作者
Matsui, Y
Utsunomiya, N
Ichioka, K
Ueda, N
Yoshimura, K
Terai, A
Arai, Y
机构
[1] Kurashiki Cent Hosp, Dept Urol, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Sendai, Miyagi 980, Japan
来源
PROSTATE | 2005年 / 64卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate cancer; mean nuclear volume; prognosis; cancer volume; prostate specific antigen;
D O I
10.1002/pros.20222
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. We examined the impact of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume (MNV) on biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) in pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer (PC) and developed a prognostic factor-based stratification model for these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS. We analyzed 141 patients with pathologically organ-confined PC treated solely with RP. Unbiased estimates of MNV were calculated from biopsy specimens based on a stereological method, and compared with other clinical and pathologic findings including patient age, pre-treatment PSA, biopsy and RP specimen Gleason score, pathologic stage, total cancer volume, index cancer volume, tumor differentiation, number of tumor foci, main tumor location, and surgical margin status, with regard to prediction of disease outcome after RP using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS. The median follow-up was 38.6 months (range 4-119 months). Twenty patients (14.2%) experienced biochemical failure. On multivariate analysis, MNV was demonstrated to be an independent prognostic factor, along with pre-treatment PSA and total cancer volume (P=0.0004, 0.0184, and 0.0285, respectively). All patients were stratified into three groups according to their prognostic scores developed on the basis of multivariate analysis, with statistically significant prognostic differences revealed for each of the between-group comparisons. CONCLUSION. The results demonstrated that estimates of MNV contribute most significantly to the prediction of biochemical control of pathologically organ-confined PC. The combination of MNV with other independent predictors such as pre-treatment PSA and total cancer volume provided a statistically verifiable basis for risk stratification, facilitating more accurate prediction of disease outcome. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 223
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The role of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume in predicting tumour biology and clinical behaviour in patients with prostate cancer undergoing watchful waiting
    Arai, Y
    Egawa, S
    Kuwao, S
    Ogura, K
    Baba, S
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 88 (09) : 909 - 914
  • [32] The Epstein criteria predict for organ-confined prostate cancer but not for minimal residual disease and outcome after radical prostatectomy
    Murray, Nigel P.
    Fuentealba, Cynthia
    Reyes, Eduardo
    Salazar, Anibal
    Guzman, Eghon
    Orrego, Shenda
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 46 (05): : 360 - 366
  • [33] Matrix Metalloproteinases and Angiogenic Factors Predictors of Survival after Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer?
    Boxler, Silvan
    Djonov, Valentin
    Kessler, Thomas M.
    Hlushchuk, Ruslan
    Bachmann, Lucas M.
    Held, Ulrike
    Markwalder, Regula
    Thalmann, George N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2010, 177 (05): : 2216 - 2224
  • [34] Analytical comparison of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume between specimens from transrectal biopsy and transurethral resection of the prostate
    Fujikawa, K
    ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY, 1997, 19 (04): : 368 - 368
  • [35] Prognostic value of nuclear morphometry on needle biopsy from patients with prostate cancer: Is volume-weighted mean nuclear volume superior to other morphometric parameters?
    Zhang, YH
    Kanamaru, H
    Oyama, N
    Miwa, Y
    Suzuki, Y
    Akino, H
    Noriki, S
    Okada, K
    UROLOGY, 2000, 55 (03) : 377 - 381
  • [36] Patterns of failure after surgically radical resection for organ-confined prostate cancer
    Mickisch, GH
    Kranse, R
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2000, 31 : 70 - 73
  • [37] Predictive factors of organ-confined prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy: a review of our centre data
    Lai, T. C. T.
    Chan, M. T. Y.
    Chu, P. S. K.
    Man, C. W.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 : 121 - 122
  • [38] Natural history of organ-confined, gleason ≤6 prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy (RP)
    Hernandez, David J.
    Nielsen, Matthew E.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Han, Misop
    Partin, Alan W.
    Walsh, Patrick C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 205 - 206
  • [39] Patient selection essential in optimizing the benefit of radical prostatectomy for patients with organ-confined prostate cancer
    Resnick, Matthew J.
    Guzzo, Thomas J.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2011, 13 (06) : 789 - 790
  • [40] Combining volume-weighted mean nuclear volume with Gleason score and clinical stage to predict more reliably disease outcome of patients with prostate cancer
    Fujikawa, K
    Sasaki, M
    Itoh, T
    Arai, Y
    Ogawa, O
    Yoshida, O
    PROSTATE, 1998, 37 (02): : 63 - 69