Pyrogenic carbon capture and storage

被引:109
|
作者
Schmidt, Hans-Peter [1 ]
Anca-Couce, Andres [2 ]
Hagemann, Nikolas [1 ,3 ]
Werner, Constanze [4 ]
Gerten, Dieter [4 ,5 ]
Lucht, Wolfgang [4 ,5 ]
Kammann, Claudia [6 ]
机构
[1] Ithaka Inst, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Thermal Engn, Graz, Austria
[3] Agroscope, Environm Analyt, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, Res Domain I Earth Syst Anal, Potsdam, Germany
[5] Humboldt Univ, Geog Dept, Berlin, Germany
[6] Hsch Geisenheim Univ, Dept Appl Ecol, Geisenheim, Germany
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2019年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
biochar; bio-oil; carbon sequestration; climate mitigation; permanent pyrogas; pyrolysis; tCDR; CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION; LOW-TEMPERATURE PYROLYSIS; INCLUDING VINEGAR LIQUID; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; BLACK CARBON; SEQUESTERING CARBON; BAMBOO CHARCOAL; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; BIOCHAR APPLICATION; GROWTH-PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12553
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The growth of biomass is considered the most efficient method currently available to extract carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, biomass carbon is easily degraded by microorganisms releasing it in the form of greenhouse gases back to the atmosphere. If biomass is pyrolyzed, the organic carbon is converted into solid (biochar), liquid (bio-oil), and gaseous (permanent pyrogas) carbonaceous products. During the last decade, biochar has been discussed as a promising option to improve soil fertility and sequester carbon, although the carbon efficiency of the thermal conversion of biomass into biochar is in the range of 30%-50% only. So far, the liquid and gaseous pyrolysis products were mainly considered for combustion, though they can equally be processed into recalcitrant forms suitable for carbon sequestration. In this review, we show that pyrolytic carbon capture and storage (PyCCS) can aspire for carbon sequestration efficiencies of >70%, which is shown to be an important threshold to allow PyCCS to become a relevant negative emission technology. Prolonged residence times of pyrogenic carbon can be generated (a) within the terrestrial biosphere including the agricultural use of biochar; (b) within advanced bio-based materials as long as they are not oxidized (biochar, bio-oil); and (c) within suitable geological deposits (bio-oil and CO2 from permanent pyrogas oxidation). While pathway (c) would need major carbon taxes or similar governmental incentives to become a realistic option, pathways (a) and (b) create added economic value and could at least partly be implemented without other financial incentives. Pyrolysis technology is already well established, biochar sequestration and bio-oil sequestration in soils, respectively biomaterials, do not present ecological hazards, and global scale-up appears feasible within a time frame of 10-30 years. Thus, PyCCS could evolve into a decisive tool for global carbon governance, serving climate change mitigation and the sustainable development goals simultaneously.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 591
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Carbon Capture and Storage: concluding remarks
    Maitland, G. C.
    FARADAY DISCUSSIONS, 2016, 192 : 581 - 599
  • [32] Last chance for carbon capture and storage
    Scott, Vivian
    Gilfillan, Stuart
    Markusson, Nils
    Chalmers, Hannah
    Haszeldine, R. Stuart
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2013, 3 (02) : 105 - 111
  • [33] Optimal Carbon Capture and Storage Policies
    Le Kama, Alain Ayong
    Fodha, Mouez
    Lafforgue, Gilles
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (04) : 417 - 426
  • [34] Integrating Carbon Capture with Transportation and Storage
    Esposito, R.
    Rhudy, R.
    Trautz, R.
    Koperna, G.
    Hill, G.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 5512 - 5519
  • [35] Last chance for carbon capture and storage
    Scott V.
    Gilfillan S.
    Markusson N.
    Chalmers H.
    Haszeldine R.S.
    Nature Climate Change, 2013, 3 (2) : 105 - 111
  • [36] Carbon capture and storage business models
    Kheshgi, Haroon
    Crookshank, Steve
    Cunha, Paulo
    Lee, Arthur
    Bernstein, Leonard
    Siveter, Robert
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 4481 - 4486
  • [37] Carbon Capture and Storage and Carbon Capture and Utilization: What Do They Offer to Indonesia?
    Adisaputro, Didi
    Saputra, Bastian
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2017, 5
  • [38] Carbon Capture, Storage As Climate Solution
    Boot, Kelvin
    SEA TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 61 (08) : 7 - 7
  • [39] Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS)
    Yan, Jinyue
    Zhang, Zhien
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 235 : 1289 - 1299
  • [40] Using Prokaryotes for Carbon Capture Storage
    Hicks, Natalie
    Vik, Unni
    Taylor, Peter
    Ladoukakis, Efthymios
    Park, Joonsang
    Kolisis, Frangiskos
    Jakobsen, Kjetill S.
    TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 35 (01) : 22 - 32