Rockburst Risk Evaluation for Stage Excavation of Underground Powerhouse

被引:0
|
作者
Qiu, Dao-Hong [1 ]
Zhang, Le-Wen [1 ]
Li, Shu-Cai [1 ]
Sun, Huai-Feng [1 ]
Zhang, De-Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Geotech & Struct Engn Res Ctr, Jinan 250061, Peoples R China
关键词
underground powerhouse; rockburst; stage excavation; numerical simulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The main powerhouse is the most important one for a hydropower station. It usually located in complex geological environment with high geostress. So that rockburst risk evaluation is very significant for actual construction. Stage excavation is very common in the building of underground powerhouse. It has practical significance to forecast rockburst according to the firstly excavated stage. Numerical simulations were done to analysis the distribution of the secondary stress field in order to evaluate the rockburst risk. The results show that rockburst would occur at the bottom angles of the later stage if rockburst occurred in the earlier stage, and rockburst risk of the sidewall would be weaker. Rockburst would also be weaker in the firstly excavated stage at the same time. Because of stress of the arch increased, support of the arch should be enhanced during the following construction.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 147
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Variation of excavation damaged zone and back analysis of large scale underground powerhouse with high geostress
    Wei, Jin-Bing
    Deng, Jian-Hui
    Yantu Lixue/Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31 (SUPPL. 1): : 330 - 336
  • [22] Study on spatial characteristics of rockburst in underground powerhouse of Shuangjiangkou Hydropower Station in ultra-high stress area
    Ma X.
    Li P.
    Guo S.
    Xu D.
    Li C.
    Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2023, 42 : 3141 - 3150
  • [23] Analytical and numerical load evaluation from excavation shoring on the powerhouse Kirchbichl
    Gloimüller S.
    Pánová P.
    Lang G.
    Geomechanik und Tunnelbau, 2020, 13 (05): : 566 - 573
  • [24] Safety evaluation of an underground excavation for crusher operation
    Yang, Hyung-sik
    Jang, Myong-Hwan
    Kim, Won-Beom
    Jang, Hyong-Doo
    Kim, Jung-Gyun
    Kim, Seung-Jun
    HARMONISING ROCK ENGINEERING AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2012, : 1619 - 1622
  • [25] Unloading deformation during layered excavation for the underground powerhouse of Jinping I Hydropower Station, southwest China
    Faquan Wu
    Xiuhong Hu
    Manfu Gong
    Jianyou Liu
    Aiwu Ren
    Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2010, 69 : 343 - 351
  • [26] Mechanical response and stability analysis of rock mass in high geostress underground powerhouse caverns subjected to excavation
    Li, Biao
    Ding, Quan-fu
    Xu, Nu-wen
    Lei, Yi-fan
    Xu, Yuan
    Zhu, Zhong-ping
    Liu, Jing-fei
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY, 2020, 27 (10) : 2971 - 2984
  • [27] Excavation-induced damage zoning of the underground powerhouse with high geostress based on multiple monitoring methods
    Xu, Nuwen
    Xiao, Peiwei
    Li, Biao
    Li, Peng
    Li, Yonghong
    Zhao, Tieshuan
    Dong, Linlu
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2024, 83 (09)
  • [28] Failure mechanism of spandrel under the excavation and unloading condition, at the upstream of underground powerhouse, Shuangjiangkou hydropower station
    Lei Y.-F.
    Xu N.-W.
    Dong L.-L.
    Li B.
    Zhao T.-S.
    Liu J.-F.
    Mao H.-Y.
    Yantu Lixue/Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41 : 322 - 332
  • [29] Microseismic monitoring and large deformation forecasting research during excavation of underground powerhouse at Wudongde hydropower station
    Li B.
    Xu N.
    Dai F.
    Gu G.
    Liu K.
    Guo L.
    Jiang P.
    Xu, Nuwen (xunuwen@scu.edu.cn), 1600, Academia Sinica (36): : 4102 - 4112
  • [30] Unloading deformation during layered excavation for the underground powerhouse of Jinping I Hydropower Station, southwest China
    Wu, Faquan
    Hu, Xiuhong
    Gong, Manfu
    Liu, Jianyou
    Ren, Aiwu
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 69 (03) : 343 - 351