HeM3D: Heterogeneous Manycore Architecture Based on Monolithic 3D Vertical Integration

被引:6
|
作者
Arka, Aqeeb Iqbal [1 ]
Joardar, Biresh Kumar [1 ]
Kim, Ryan Gary [2 ]
Kim, Dae Hyun [1 ]
Doppa, Janardhan Rao [1 ]
Pande, Partha Pratim [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, 355 NE Spokane St, Pullman, WA 99163 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Engn C201G,1373 Campus Delivery, Ft Collins, CO 80524 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Heterogeneous manycore; NoC; M3D; performance; execution time; temperature; multi-tier; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1145/3424239
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Heterogeneous manycore architectures are the key to efficiently execute compute- and data-intensive applications. Through-silicon-via (TSV)-based 3D manycore system is a promising solution in this direction as it enables the integration of disparate computing cores on a single system. Recent industry trends show the viability of 3D integration in real products (e.g., Intel Lakefield SoC Architecture, the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X graphics card, and Xilinx Virtex-7 2000T/H580T, etc.). However, the achievable performance of conventional TSV-based 3D systems is ultimately bottlenecked by the horizontal wires (wires in each planar die). Moreover, current TSV 3D architectures suffer from thermal limitations. Hence, TSV-based architectures do not realize the full potential of 3D integration. Monolithic 3D (M3D) integration, a breakthrough technology to achieve "More Moore and More Than Moore," opens up the possibility of designing cores and associated network routers using multiple layers by utilizing monolithic inter-tier vias (MIVs) and hence, reducing the effective wire length. Compared to TSV-based 3D integrated circuits (ICs), M3D offers the "true" benefits of vertical dimension for system integration: the size of an MIV used in M3D is over 100 x smaller than a TSV. This dramatic reduction in via size and the resulting increase in density opens up numerous opportunities for design optimizations in 3D manycore systems: designers can use up to millions of MIVs for ultra-fine-grained 3D optimization, where individual cores and routers can be spread across multiple tiers for extreme power and performance optimization. In this work, we demonstrate how M3D-enabled vertical core and uncore elements offer significant performance and thermal improvements in manycore heterogeneous architectures compared to its TSV-based counterpart. To overcome the difficult optimization challenges due to the large design space and complex interactions among the heterogeneous components (CPU, GPU, Last Level Cache, etc.) in a M3D-based manycore chip, we leverage novel design-space exploration algorithms to trade off different objectives. The proposed M3D-enabled heterogeneous architecture, called HeM3D, outperforms its state-of-the-art TSV-equivalent counterpart by up to 18.3% in execution time while being up to 19 degrees C cooler.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 3D Heterogeneous System Integration: Application Driver for 3D Technology Development
    Beyne, Eric
    Marchal, Pol
    Van Der Plas, Geert
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 48TH ACM/EDAC/IEEE DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE (DAC), 2011, : 213 - 213
  • [32] Thin, Fully Depleted Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor based on 3D Integration of Heterogeneous CMOS Layers
    Dulinski, W.
    Bertolone, G.
    de Masi, R.
    Degerli, Y.
    Dorokhov, A.
    Morel, F.
    Orsini, F.
    Ratti, L.
    Santos, C.
    Re, V.
    Wei, X.
    Winter, M.
    [J]. 2009 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-5, 2009, : 1165 - +
  • [33] Ultra-High Density 3D SRAM Cell Designs for Monolithic 3D Integration
    Liu, Chang
    Lim, Sung Kyu
    [J]. 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL INTERCONNECT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (IITC), 2012,
  • [34] Benchmarking IWO-based Logic Circuits for Monolithic 3D Integration
    Shahin, Sufia
    Kumar, Shubham
    Chatterjee, Swetaki
    Amrouch, Hussam
    Chauhan, Yogesh Singh
    [J]. 8TH IEEE ELECTRON DEVICES TECHNOLOGY & MANUFACTURING CONFERENCE, EDTM 2024, 2024, : 702 - 704
  • [35] Status and perspectives of pixel sensors based on 3D vertical integration
    Re, Valerio
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2014, 765 : 47 - 52
  • [36] 3D heterogeneous integration based on through X via technology
    Li, Yanrui
    Qin, Yueli
    Wang, Chunfu
    Wang, Wenbo
    Xiang, Weiwei
    [J]. 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MICROWAVE AND MILLIMETER WAVE TECHNOLOGY (ICMMT2018), 2018,
  • [37] Monolithic 3-D Integration
    Bishop, Mindy D.
    Wong, H-S. Philip
    Mitra, Subhasish
    Shulaker, Max M.
    [J]. IEEE MICRO, 2019, 39 (06) : 16 - 27
  • [38] Design Issues in Heterogeneous 3D/2.5D Integration
    Milojevic, Dragomir
    Marchal, Pol
    Marinissen, Erik Jan
    Van der Plas, Geert
    Verkest, Diederik
    Beyne, Eric
    [J]. 2013 18TH ASIA AND SOUTH PACIFIC DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE (ASP-DAC), 2013, : 403 - 410
  • [39] 2.5D and 3D Heterogeneous Integration: Emerging applications
    Sheikh, Farhana
    Nagisetty, Ramune
    Karnik, Tanay
    Kehlet, David
    [J]. IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine, 2021, 13 (04): : 77 - 87
  • [40] Monolithic 3D Integration Process and Its Device Applications
    Choi, Changhwan
    [J]. 6TH IEEE ELECTRON DEVICES TECHNOLOGY AND MANUFACTURING CONFERENCE (EDTM 2022), 2022, : 76 - 78