Active debris removal: Recent progress and current trends

被引:230
|
作者
Bonnal, Christophe [1 ]
Ruault, Jean-Marc [1 ]
Desjean, Marie-Christine [1 ]
机构
[1] CNES French Space Agcy, Launcher Directorate, F-75012 Paris, France
关键词
Space debris; Kessler syndrome; Debris mitigation; Debris remediation; Active debris Removal; SPACE DEBRIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.11.009
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
According to all available findings at international level, the Kessler syndrome, increase of the number of space debris in Low Earth Orbits due to mutual collisions, appears now to be a fact, triggered mainly by several major break-ups in orbit which occurred since 2007. The time may have come to study how to clean this fundamentally useful orbital region in an active way. CNES has studied potential solutions for more than 12 years! The paper aims at reviewing the current status of these activities. The high level requirements are fundamental, and have to be properly justified. The working basis, as confirmed through IADC studies consists in the removal of 5-10 integer objects from the overcrowded orbits, spent upper stages or old satellites, as identified by NASA. The logic of CNES activities consider a stepped approach aiming at progressively gaining the required Technological Readiness Level on the features required for Active Debris Removal which have not yet been demonstrated in orbit. The rendezvous with a non-cooperative, un-prepared, tumbling debris is essential. Following maturation gained with Research and Technology programs, a set of small orbital demonstrators could enable a confidence high enough to perform a full end to end demonstration performing the de-orbiting of a large debris and paving the way for the development of a first generation operational de-orbiter. The internal CNES studies, led together by the Toulouse Space Centre and the Paris Launcher Directorate, have started in 2008 and led to a detailed System Requirements Document used for the Industrial studies. Three industrial teams did work under CNES contract during 2011, led by Thales Alenia Space, Bertin Technologies and Astrium Space Transportation, with numerous sub-contractors. Their approaches were very rich, complementary, and innovative. The second phase of studies began mid-2012. Some key questions nevertheless have to be resolved, and correspond generally to current IADC actions: The casualty risk associated to a "passive" de-orbitation is of paramount importance, major driver between passive and active re-entry, The residual movement of debris is crucial for the interfacing phase, whichever the solution is, The debris physical state in orbit is a major question, Some solutions increase the collision risk but for a limited time period; we may not have yet the appropriate tools. The paper gives a status of where we stand, of the cooperation with the international partners, and raises the questions which remain open and have to be dealt with in the coming months. (C) 2012 IAA. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 60
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Autonomous Active Space Debris-Removal System
    Chawla, Shriya Kaur
    Malhotra, Vinayak
    2019 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2019,
  • [42] Momentum based classification for robotic active debris removal
    Vyas, Shubham
    Jankovic, Marko
    Kirchner, Frank
    JOURNAL OF SPACE SAFETY ENGINEERING, 2022, 9 (04): : 649 - 655
  • [43] Dynamics of rotating tethered system for active debris removal
    Trushlyakov, Valeriy
    Yudintsev, Vadim
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2022, 195 : 405 - 415
  • [44] Laser based Active Debris Removal Technology for ENVISAT
    Baraskar, Aditya
    Fukushima, Tadanori
    Itaya, Yuki
    Fujihara, Tomoaki
    Nagamine, Kenshin
    Tsuno, Katsuhiko
    Kawai, Yoshiharu
    Maruyama, Masayuki
    Ogawa, Takayo
    Wada, Satoshi
    Ebisuzaki, Toshikazu
    Casolino, Marco
    Sakai, Daisuke
    Yoshimura, Yasuhiro
    Hanada, Toshiya
    Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC, 2022, 2022-September
  • [45] Modeling and control of a space robot for active debris removal
    Dubanchet V.
    Saussié D.
    Alazard D.
    Bérard C.
    Peuvédic C.L.
    CEAS Space Journal, 2015, 7 (02) : 203 - 218
  • [46] On the use of A* search for active debris removal mission planning
    Federici, Lorenzo
    Zavoli, Alessandro
    Colasurdo, Guido
    JOURNAL OF SPACE SAFETY ENGINEERING, 2021, 8 (03): : 245 - 255
  • [47] Optimization of Active Debris Removal Missions with Multiple Targets
    Shen, Hong-Xin
    Zhang, Tian-Jiao
    Casalino, Lorenzo
    Pastrone, Dario
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2018, 55 (01) : 181 - 189
  • [48] Mission concept and autonomy considerations for active Debris removal
    Peters, Susanne
    Pirzkall, Christoph
    Fiedler, Hauke
    Foerstner, Roger
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2016, 129 : 410 - 418
  • [49] Evolutionary Optimization for Active Debris Removal Mission Planning
    Zona, Danilo
    Zavoli, Alessandro
    Federici, Lorenzo
    Avanzini, Giulio
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 41019 - 41033
  • [50] Space debris active removal mission planning: A review
    Xu Y.-J.
    Liu X.-L.
    He R.-J.
    Zuo Y.-H.
    Song Y.-J.
    Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2024, 39 (02): : 371 - 380