Active debris removal: Recent progress and current trends

被引:230
|
作者
Bonnal, Christophe [1 ]
Ruault, Jean-Marc [1 ]
Desjean, Marie-Christine [1 ]
机构
[1] CNES French Space Agcy, Launcher Directorate, F-75012 Paris, France
关键词
Space debris; Kessler syndrome; Debris mitigation; Debris remediation; Active debris Removal; SPACE DEBRIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.11.009
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
According to all available findings at international level, the Kessler syndrome, increase of the number of space debris in Low Earth Orbits due to mutual collisions, appears now to be a fact, triggered mainly by several major break-ups in orbit which occurred since 2007. The time may have come to study how to clean this fundamentally useful orbital region in an active way. CNES has studied potential solutions for more than 12 years! The paper aims at reviewing the current status of these activities. The high level requirements are fundamental, and have to be properly justified. The working basis, as confirmed through IADC studies consists in the removal of 5-10 integer objects from the overcrowded orbits, spent upper stages or old satellites, as identified by NASA. The logic of CNES activities consider a stepped approach aiming at progressively gaining the required Technological Readiness Level on the features required for Active Debris Removal which have not yet been demonstrated in orbit. The rendezvous with a non-cooperative, un-prepared, tumbling debris is essential. Following maturation gained with Research and Technology programs, a set of small orbital demonstrators could enable a confidence high enough to perform a full end to end demonstration performing the de-orbiting of a large debris and paving the way for the development of a first generation operational de-orbiter. The internal CNES studies, led together by the Toulouse Space Centre and the Paris Launcher Directorate, have started in 2008 and led to a detailed System Requirements Document used for the Industrial studies. Three industrial teams did work under CNES contract during 2011, led by Thales Alenia Space, Bertin Technologies and Astrium Space Transportation, with numerous sub-contractors. Their approaches were very rich, complementary, and innovative. The second phase of studies began mid-2012. Some key questions nevertheless have to be resolved, and correspond generally to current IADC actions: The casualty risk associated to a "passive" de-orbitation is of paramount importance, major driver between passive and active re-entry, The residual movement of debris is crucial for the interfacing phase, whichever the solution is, The debris physical state in orbit is a major question, Some solutions increase the collision risk but for a limited time period; we may not have yet the appropriate tools. The paper gives a status of where we stand, of the cooperation with the international partners, and raises the questions which remain open and have to be dealt with in the coming months. (C) 2012 IAA. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 60
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biomimetic space debris removal: conceptual design of bio-inspired active debris removal scenarios
    E. Banken
    V. E. Schneider
    M. K. Ben-Larbi
    L. Pambaguian
    J. Oeffner
    CEAS Space Journal, 2023, 15 : 237 - 252
  • [32] Thermal analysis of space debris for infrared-based active debris removal
    Yilmaz, Ozgun
    Aouf, Nabil
    Checa, Elena
    Majewski, Laurent
    Sanchez-Gestido, Manuel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2019, 233 (03) : 811 - 822
  • [33] Recent trends in arsenic removal technologies
    Viraraghavan, Thiruvenkatachari
    Chowdwry, Pankaj
    PROGRESS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL I, 2007, : 692 - 694
  • [34] Active space debris removal by a hybrid propulsion module
    DeLuca, L. T.
    Bernelli, F.
    Maggi, F.
    Tadini, P.
    Pardini, C.
    Anselmo, L.
    Grassi, M.
    Pavarin, D.
    Francesconi, A.
    Branz, F.
    Chiesa, S.
    Viola, N.
    Bonnal, C.
    Trushlyakov, V.
    Belokonov, I.
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2013, 91 : 20 - 33
  • [35] Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions
    Lidtke, Aleksander A.
    Lewis, Hugh G.
    Armellin, Roberto
    Urrutxua, Hodei
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2017, 131 : 10 - 17
  • [36] A sensitivity study of the effectiveness of active debris removal in LEO
    Liou, J-C.
    Johnson, Nicholas L.
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2009, 64 (2-3) : 236 - 243
  • [37] Development status of an active space debris removal system
    Nishida, Shin-ichiro
    Kawamoto, Satomi
    Okawa, Yasushi
    Yoshimura, Shoichi
    Terui, Fuyuto
    Nakajima, Atsushi
    Kitamura, Shoji
    SPACE DEBRIS AND SPACE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM 2005, 2006, 112 : 233 - +
  • [38] Rotating tethered system for active space debris removal
    Trushlyakov, V., I
    Yudintsev, V. V.
    MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY UPDATE (MSTU 2019), 2019, 1260
  • [39] Rotary Space Tether System for Active Debris Removal
    Trushlyakov, Valeriy, I
    Yudintsev, Vadim V.
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2020, 43 (02) : 354 - 364
  • [40] A Redundant Manipulator Design for Active Space Debris Removal
    Yan Wenbin
    Qi Ningning
    Ai Jialin
    Sun Lei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE 2016, 2016, : 4585 - 4590