The interaction between active aeroelastic control and structural tailoring in aeroservoelastic wing design

被引:11
|
作者
Binder, Simon [1 ,2 ]
Wildschek, Andreas [3 ]
De Breuker, Roeland [2 ]
机构
[1] Airbus Def & Space GmbH, Mat X, Bremen, Germany
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Aerosp Engn, Sect Aerosp Struct & Computat Mech, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Airbus Operat SAS, Aircraft Control Domain, Toulouse, France
关键词
Aeroservoelastic optimization; Composite tailoring; Feed-forward gust load control; Manoeuver load alleviation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2021.106516
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper presents an analysis of the interaction and trade-off between active aeroelastic control and passive structural tailoring on a free-flying fully flexible aircraft model. Both technologies are included in the preliminary design of a typical transport aircraft configuration with a conventional control surface layout containing trailing edge control surfaces and spoilers. The passive structural tailoring is facilitated by exploiting the anisotropic properties of composite materials to steer the static and dynamic aeroelastic behaviour. Active aeroelastic control is implemented by scheduled control surface deflections redistributing the aerodynamic loads during manoeuvres to achieve manoeuvre load alleviation and a feed-forward control law for gust load alleviation. The panel-based aerodynamic modelling of spoiler deflections is improved by a correction of the spatial distribution of the boundary condition derived from higher fidelity simulation data. The optimisation of active control laws requires the consideration of constraints of the actuation system, namely rate and deflection saturation, in a nonlinear manner. The interaction of manoeuvre load alleviation, gust load alleviation and passive structural tailoring is investigated on the basis of results of different aeroservoelastic optimisations. Therefore the primary wing structure is simultaneously optimised with the individual technologies being activated or deactivated, resulting in eight different wing structures. The results of the individual and combined optimisations reveal significant design differences. The potentials of the different technologies can only be optimally exploited by simultaneous optimisation. The paper concludes with a study of the sensitivity of the major findings with respect to the knockdown factor for failure applied to the material properties. A substantial shift of effectiveness from active aeroelastic control to passive structural tailoring is observed with increased allowables resulting in more flexible and hence less stiff wing designs. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Design of active control law for aeroelastic systems via reduced order models
    Chen, Gang
    Li, Yueming
    Yan, Guirong
    Xu, Min
    Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2010, 31 (01): : 12 - 18
  • [42] Active Disturbance Rejection Control System Design for a Morphing Wing Structure
    Shi, Rongqi
    Song, Jianmei
    Wan, Weiyu
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2015, 17 (03) : 832 - 841
  • [43] FLUTTER SUPPRESSION CONTROL LAW DESIGN AND TESTING FOR THE ACTIVE FLEXIBLE WING
    MUKHOPADHYAY, V
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1995, 32 (01): : 45 - 51
  • [44] Flutter suppression control law design and testing for the active flexible wing
    Mukhopadhyay, Vivek
    Journal of Aircraft, 1995, 32 (01): : 45 - 51
  • [45] Structural design and control of variable camber wing driven by ultrasonic motors
    State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing
    210016, China
    Trans. Nanjing Univ. Aero. Astro., 2 (180-186):
  • [46] Structural Design and Control of Variable Camber Wing Driven by Ultrasonic Motors
    刘卫东
    朱华
    周盛强
    白亚磊
    赵淳生
    Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015, 32 (02) : 180 - 186
  • [47] Performance Comparison Between Piezoelectrically Induced Stresses and Active Control for Aeroelastic Stability Augmentation
    Siqueira Versiani, Thiago de Souza
    Bertolin, Rafael Mendes
    Donadon, Mauricio Vicente
    Silvestre, Flavio Jose
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2021, 59 (12) : 5049 - 5065
  • [48] Structural sparsity in control design of active and semi-active systems
    Florez, Alvaro Javier
    Giraldo, Luis Felipe
    Gutierrez Soto, Mariantonieta
    Zuniga, Fernel Orlando
    STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2021, 28 (08):
  • [49] INVESTIGATION OF SHOCK-WAVE/BOUNDARY-LAYER INTERACTION ON AEROELASTIC STABILITY : TOWARDS ACTIVE CONTROL
    Rendu, Quentin
    Rozenberg, Yannick
    Aubert, Stephane
    Ferrand, Pascal
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2016, VOL 7A, 2016,
  • [50] Structural Sparsity for Active Control Design in Civil Engineering
    Javier Florez, Alvaro
    Felipe Giraldo, Luis
    Carlos Reyes, Juan
    2017 IEEE CONFERENCE ON CONTROL TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS (CCTA 2017), 2017, : 708 - 713