The interaction between active aeroelastic control and structural tailoring in aeroservoelastic wing design

被引:11
|
作者
Binder, Simon [1 ,2 ]
Wildschek, Andreas [3 ]
De Breuker, Roeland [2 ]
机构
[1] Airbus Def & Space GmbH, Mat X, Bremen, Germany
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Aerosp Engn, Sect Aerosp Struct & Computat Mech, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Airbus Operat SAS, Aircraft Control Domain, Toulouse, France
关键词
Aeroservoelastic optimization; Composite tailoring; Feed-forward gust load control; Manoeuver load alleviation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2021.106516
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper presents an analysis of the interaction and trade-off between active aeroelastic control and passive structural tailoring on a free-flying fully flexible aircraft model. Both technologies are included in the preliminary design of a typical transport aircraft configuration with a conventional control surface layout containing trailing edge control surfaces and spoilers. The passive structural tailoring is facilitated by exploiting the anisotropic properties of composite materials to steer the static and dynamic aeroelastic behaviour. Active aeroelastic control is implemented by scheduled control surface deflections redistributing the aerodynamic loads during manoeuvres to achieve manoeuvre load alleviation and a feed-forward control law for gust load alleviation. The panel-based aerodynamic modelling of spoiler deflections is improved by a correction of the spatial distribution of the boundary condition derived from higher fidelity simulation data. The optimisation of active control laws requires the consideration of constraints of the actuation system, namely rate and deflection saturation, in a nonlinear manner. The interaction of manoeuvre load alleviation, gust load alleviation and passive structural tailoring is investigated on the basis of results of different aeroservoelastic optimisations. Therefore the primary wing structure is simultaneously optimised with the individual technologies being activated or deactivated, resulting in eight different wing structures. The results of the individual and combined optimisations reveal significant design differences. The potentials of the different technologies can only be optimally exploited by simultaneous optimisation. The paper concludes with a study of the sensitivity of the major findings with respect to the knockdown factor for failure applied to the material properties. A substantial shift of effectiveness from active aeroelastic control to passive structural tailoring is observed with increased allowables resulting in more flexible and hence less stiff wing designs. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Aeroservoelastic structural and control optimization using classical and modern robust design schemes
    Moulin, B
    Idan, M
    Karpel, M
    COLLECTION OF THE 41ST AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC STRUCTURES, STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, AND MATERIALS CONFERENCE AND EXHIBIT, VOL 1 PTS 1-3, 2000, : 819 - 828
  • [32] Active Aeroelastic Control Over a Multisurface Wing: Modeling and Wind-Tunnel Testing
    De Gaspari, A.
    Ricci, S.
    Riccobene, L.
    Scotti, A.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2009, 47 (09) : 1995 - 2010
  • [33] Robust structural design of an active aeroelastic vying with maneuver load inaccuracies
    Zink, PS
    Raveh, DE
    Mavris, DN
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2004, 41 (03): : 585 - 593
  • [34] SELF-POWERED ACTIVE CONTROL FOR AN AEROELASTIC PLATE-LIKE WING USING PIEZOELECTRIC MATERIAL
    Silva, Tarcisio M. P.
    De Marqui Junior, Carlos
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME CONFERENCE ON SMART MATERIALS, ADAPTIVE STRUCTURES AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2014, VOL 1, 2014,
  • [35] Active aeroelastic control aspects of an aircraft wing by using synthetic jet actuators:: Modeling, simulations, experiments
    Donnell, K. O'
    Schober, S.
    Stolk, M.
    Marzocca, P.
    De Breuke, R.
    Abdalla, M.
    Nicolini, E.
    Guerdal, Z.
    MODELING, SIGNAL PROCESSING, AND CONTROL FOR SMART STRUCTURES 2007, 2007, 6523
  • [36] Multiobjective optimization of an aircraft wing design with respect to structural and aeroelastic characteristics using neural network metamodel
    Caixeta, P. R., Jr.
    Marques, F. D.
    JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 40 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [37] Multiobjective optimization of an aircraft wing design with respect to structural and aeroelastic characteristics using neural network metamodel
    P. R. Caixeta
    F. D. Marques
    Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2018, 40
  • [38] Enclosure acoustics modeling and control utilizing a passive and active structural tailoring
    Whitmer, Christopher E.
    Kelkar, Atul G.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 45TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-14, 2006, : 6684 - 6689
  • [39] State dependant anytime control methodology for prototypical aeroelastic wing section with structural non-linearity
    Várkonyi-Kóczy, AR
    Baranyi, P
    Kiss, L
    Várlaki, P
    2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 200 - 205
  • [40] Active control design for an unmanned air vehicle with a morphing wing
    Li, Daochun
    Guo, Shijun
    Aburass, Tariq Osman
    Yang, Daqing
    Xiang, Jinwu
    AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 88 (01): : 168 - 177