Assessment of GCMs simulation performance for precipitation and temperature from CMIP5 to CMIP6 over the Tibetan Plateau

被引:119
|
作者
Lun, Yurui [1 ]
Liu, Liu [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Lei [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Li, Xiuping [6 ]
Li, Hao [7 ]
Xu, Zongxue [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Water Resources & Civil Engn, 17 Tsinghua East Rd, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] China Agr Univ, Ctr Agr Water Res China, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[4] Hubei Prov Collaborat Innovat Ctr Water Resources, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[5] Wuhan Univ, Hubei Prov Key Lab Water Syst Sci Sponge City Con, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Acad China, Inst Tibetan Plateau Res, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Univ Ghent, Lab Hydrol & Water Management, Ghent, Belgium
[8] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Water Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[9] Beijing Key Lab Urban Hydrol Cycle & Sponge City, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
climate change; Coupled Model Intercomparison Project; elevation dependency; ensemble; Tibetan Plateau; uncertainty; GLOBAL CLIMATE MODELS; INTERANNUAL VARIABILITY; INDIAN SUBCONTINENT; RAINFALL; EXTREMES; CHINA; PROJECTIONS; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1002/joc.7055
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
General circulation models (GCMs) are indispensable for climate change adaptive study over the Tibetan Plateau (TP), which is the potential trigger and amplifier in global climate fluctuations. With the release of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), 24 GCMs from CMIP5 and CMIP6 were comparatively evaluated for precipitation and air temperature simulations based on the China Meteorological Forcing Dataset (CMFD). Rank score results showed that CMIP6 models generally performed better than CMIP5 for precipitation and surface air temperature over the TP. According to multimodel ensembles (MMEs) of the optimal GCMs for each climate variable, the overestimation of precipitation was both present in CMIP5 and CMIP6, but the results of CMIP6 MMEs were relatively lower in the mid-west and northern edge of the TP. Furthermore, CMIP6 offered a better performance of precipitation in summer and autumn. For temperature, CMIP6 MMEs were able to reduce the relatively large cold bias that appeared in CMIP5 MMEs in northwest areas to about 1 degrees C and had a smaller bias in spring and winter. Moreover, the investigation into the simulation effects of precipitation at different elevation zones demonstrated that the improved ability of CMIP6 MMEs to reduce bias was mainly concentrated in the elevation zones of 2,000-3,000 m and over 5,000 m, where the precipitation bias was more than 200%. Additionally, CMIP6 MMEs of temperature were able to reduce the bias to less than 2 degrees C in each elevation zone, with the minimum bias of -0.22 degrees C distributed in the region with altitudes from 3,000 to 4,000 m, while the biases of CMIP5 MMEs in the region of 4,000-5,000 m and over 5,000 m were smaller than those of CMIP6 MMEs. Findings obtained in this study could provide a scientific reference for related climate change research over the TP. GCMs of CMIP6 perform better than those of CMIP5 for precipitation and temperature over the TP. Multimodel ensembles (MMEs) of CMIP6 effectively reduce the overestimation of precipitation from CMIP5 MMEs by 40 mm at the annual scale. Improved ability of CMIP6 MMEs shows a significant elevation dependency, especially in elevation zones of 2,000-3,000 m and over 5,000 m for precipitation.
引用
收藏
页码:3994 / 4018
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Projection of precipitation extremes over South Asia from CMIP6 GCMs
    Abbas, Adnan
    Bhatti, Asher S.
    Ullah, Safi
    Ullah, Waheed
    Waseem, Muhammad
    Zhao, Chengyi
    Dou, Xin
    Ali, Gohar
    JOURNAL OF ARID LAND, 2023, 15 (03) : 274 - 296
  • [42] Comparison of precipitation projections of CMIP5 and CMIP6 global climate models over Yulin, China
    Mohammed Sanusi Shiru
    Eun-Sung Chung
    Shamsuddin Shahid
    Xiao-jun Wang
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 147 : 535 - 548
  • [43] Comparison of precipitation projections of CMIP5 and CMIP6 global climate models over Yulin, China
    Shiru, Mohammed Sanusi
    Chung, Eun-Sung
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    Wang, Xiao-jun
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 147 (1-2) : 535 - 548
  • [44] Projected Changes and Time of Emergence of Temperature Extremes Over Australia in CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Deng, Xu
    Perkins-Kirkpatrick, Sarah E.
    Alexander, Lisa, V
    Stark, Clair
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2022, 10 (09)
  • [45] Assessment of the Southern Ocean Sea Surface Temperature Biases in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Gao, Zhen
    Zhao, Shichang
    Liu, Qinyu
    Long, Shang-Min
    Sun, Shantong
    JOURNAL OF OCEAN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA, 2024, 23 (05) : 1135 - 1150
  • [46] Hydrological Projections under CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Wu, Yi
    Miao, Chiyuan
    Slater, Louise
    Fan, Xuewei
    Chai, Yuanfang
    Sorooshian, Soroosh
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 105 (01) : E2374 - E2389
  • [47] Assessment of the Southern Ocean Sea Surface Temperature Biases in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    GAO Zhen
    ZHAO Shichang
    LIU Qinyu
    LONG ShangMin
    SUN Shantong
    Journal of Ocean University of China, 2024, 23 (05) : 1135 - 1150
  • [48] CMIP5 SCIENTIFIC GAPS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CMIP6
    Stouffer, R. J.
    Eyring, V.
    Meehl, G. A.
    Bony, S.
    Senior, C.
    Stevens, B.
    Taylor, K. E.
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 98 (01) : 95 - +
  • [49] Performance of the CMIP5 models in the simulation of the Himalaya-Tibetan Plateau monsoon
    Popat Salunke
    Shipra Jain
    Saroj Kanta Mishra
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2019, 137 : 909 - 928
  • [50] Projections of Greenland climate change from CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Zhang, Qinglin
    Huai, Baojuan
    Ding, Minghu
    Sun, Weijun
    Liu, Weigang
    Yan, Jinpei
    Zhao, Shuhui
    Wang, Yetang
    Wang, Yuzhe
    Wang, Lei
    Che, Jiahang
    Dou, Jiahui
    Kang, Limin
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2024, 232