Minipig Model of Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis: Immunohistochemical and Histomorphometric Analysis of the Sequence of Osteogenesis

被引:2
|
作者
Papadaki, Maria E. [1 ]
Kaban, Leonard B. [1 ]
Troulis, Maria J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
SUTURAL EXPANSION OSTEOGENESIS; MANDIBULAR DISTRACTION; BONE-FORMATION; MIDFACE ADVANCEMENT; GRADUAL DISTRACTION; CLEFT-PALATE; FOLLOW-UP; DEVICE; TRANSPORT; DOGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.030
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To document the sequence of bone formation in a minipig model of Le Fort I distraction osteogenesis (DO) using immunohistochemistry and histomorphometry. Materials and Methods: Female Yucatan minipigs (N = 9) in the mixed-dentition stage underwent bilateral maxillary DO. The distraction protocol was 0 days of latency, with a distraction rate of 1 mm/d for 12 days and 24 days of fixation. Specimens were harvested and divided between the central incisors (18 hemi-maxillae) at the end of DO (n = 6), at mid-fixation (n = 6), and at the end of fixation (n = 6). Sections, including the advancement zone, were stained with hematoxylin-eosin, collagen II, CD34, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase. Light and fluorescence microscope images (original magnification x200) were obtained, and percentage of surface area (PSA) of the advancement zone occupied by fibrous tissue, vessels, proliferating cells, osteoid, and bone was determined. An intact maxilla served as the control. Results: At the end of DO, in the advancement zone, the PSA (mean values) of proliferating cells was 33.16%; fibrous tissue, 52%; vessels, 4.35%; and new bone, 5.45%. At the end of fixation, the PSA of proliferating cells decreased to 10.53%, fibrous tissue to 2.3%, and vessels to 1.5% whereas the PSA of new bone increased to 44.9%. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the progression of osteogenesis in the maxillary DO wound begins with intense cellular proliferation and vascular fibrous tissue formation and progresses to mature, cancellous bone by the end of fixation. The PSA occupied by mature bone is significantly less than in the control maxilla at the end of fixation. This is consistent with the sequence in the mandibular DO wound. This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use. Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:2629-2640, 2012
引用
收藏
页码:2629 / 2640
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Minipig Model of Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis
    Papadaki, Maria E.
    Troulis, Maria J.
    Glowacki, Julie
    Kaban, Leonard B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 68 (11) : 2783 - 2791
  • [2] Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in a Patient With Osteogenesis Imperfecta
    Kunkel, Ryan
    Kim, Erinn
    Tuncer, Fatma Betul
    Siddiqi, Faizi
    Gociman, Barbu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (08) : 2530 - 2532
  • [3] A Histomorphometric Analysis of Radiation Damage in an Isogenic Murine Model of Distraction Osteogenesis
    Zheutlin, Alexander R.
    Deshpande, Sagar S.
    Nelson, Noah S.
    Polyatskaya, Yekaterina
    Rodriguez, Jose J.
    Donneys, Alexis
    Buchman, Steven R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 73 (12) : 2419 - 2428
  • [4] Maxillary intraoral distraction osteogenesis
    Guerrero, CA
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES: 2001 DISTRACTION ODYSSEY, 2001, : 381 - 387
  • [5] Longitudinal cephalometric analysis after maxillary distraction osteogenesis
    Krimmel, M
    Cornelius, CP
    Bacher, M
    Gülicher, D
    Reinert, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 16 (04) : 683 - 688
  • [6] Vector alignment in maxillary distraction osteogenesis
    Uckan, Sina
    Arman, Ayca
    Bayram, Burak
    Celik, Erkan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 17 (05) : 992 - 997
  • [7] Maxillary distraction osteogenesis: A two-dimensional mathematical model
    Swennen, G
    Figueroa, AA
    Schierle, H
    Polley, JW
    Malevez, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 11 (04) : 312 - 317
  • [8] Sequential histomorphometric analysis of regenerate osteogenesis following mandibular distraction in the rat
    Williams, BE
    King, GJ
    Liu, ZJ
    Rafferty, KL
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (05) : 497 - 506
  • [9] A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis
    Cheung, LK
    Chua, HDP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 35 (01) : 14 - 24
  • [10] Histomorphometric comparison between continuous and discontinuous distraction osteogenesis
    Djasim, U. M.
    Mathot, B. J.
    Wolvius, E. B.
    van Neck, J. W.
    van der Wal, K. G. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 37 (07) : 398 - 404