A comparison of DNA extraction procedures for the detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of Buruli ulcer, in clinical and environmental specimens

被引:27
|
作者
Durnez, Lies [1 ,2 ]
Stragier, Pieter [1 ]
Roebben, Karen [1 ]
Ablordey, Anthony [1 ,3 ]
Leirs, Herwig [2 ,4 ]
Portaels, Francoise [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Trop Med, Mycobacteriol Unit, Dept Microbiol, Inst Trop Med, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp, Evolutionary Ecol Grp, Dept Biol, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Noguchi Mem Inst Med Res, Dept Bacteriol, Accra, Ghana
[4] Univ Aarhus, Danish Pest Infestat Lab, Fac Agr Sci, Dept Integrat Pest Management, Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
Buruli ulcer; Clinical specimens; DNA extraction; Environmental specimens; Modified Boom; Mycobacterium ulcerans; PCR; SEQUENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.mimet.2008.10.002
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Mycobacterium ulcerans is the causative agent of Buruli ulcer, the third most common mycobacterial disease in humans after tuberculosis and leprosy. Although the disease is associated with aquatic ecosystems, cultivation of the bacillus from the environment is difficult to achieve. Therefore, at the moment, research is based on the detection by PCR of the insertion sequence IS2404 present in M. ulcerans and some closely related mycobacteria. In the present study, we compared four DNA extraction methods for detection of M. ulcerans DNA, namely the one tube cell lysis and DNA extraction procedure (OT), the FastPrep procedure (FP), the modified Boom procedure (MB), and the Maxwell (R) 16 Procedure (M16). The methods were performed on serial dilutions of M. ulcerans, followed by PCR analysis with different PCR targets in M. ulcerans to determine the detection limit (DL) of each method. The purity of the extracted DNA and the time and effort needed were compared as well. All methods were performed on environmental specimens and the two best methods (MB and M16) were tested on clinical specimens for detection of M. ulcerans DNA. When comparing the DLs of the DNA extraction methods, the MB and M16 had a significantly lower DL than the OT and FP. For the different PCR targets, IS2404 showed a significantly lower DL than mlsA, MIRU1, MIRU5 and VNTR6. The FP and M16 were considerably faster than the MB and OT, while the purity of the DNA extracted with the MB was significantly higher than the DNA extracted with the other methods. The MB performed best on the environmental and clinical specimens. This comparative study shows that the modified Boom procedure, although lengthy, provides a better method of DNA extraction than the other methods tested for detection and identification of M. ulcerans in both clinical and environmental specimens. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 158
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the origin of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of Buruli ulcer
    Doig, Kenneth D.
    Holt, Kathryn E.
    Fyfe, Janet A. M.
    Lavender, Caroline J.
    Eddyani, Miriam
    Portaels, Francoise
    Yeboah-Manu, Dorothy
    Pluschke, Gerd
    Seemann, Torsten
    Stinear, Timothy P.
    BMC GENOMICS, 2012, 13
  • [2] On the origin of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of Buruli ulcer
    Kenneth D Doig
    Kathryn E Holt
    Janet AM Fyfe
    Caroline J Lavender
    Miriam Eddyani
    Françoise Portaels
    Dorothy Yeboah-Manu
    Gerd Pluschke
    Torsten Seemann
    Timothy P Stinear
    BMC Genomics, 13
  • [3] Seasonal Pattern of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the Causative Agent of Buruli Ulcer, in the Environment in Ghana
    Aboagye, Samuel Yaw
    Ampah, Kobina Assan
    Ross, Amanda
    Asare, Prince
    Otchere, Isaac Darko
    Fyfe, Janet
    Yeboah-Manu, Dorothy
    MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 2017, 74 (02) : 350 - 361
  • [4] Seasonal Pattern of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the Causative Agent of Buruli Ulcer, in the Environment in Ghana
    Samuel Yaw Aboagye
    Kobina Assan Ampah
    Amanda Ross
    Prince Asare
    Isaac Darko Otchere
    Janet Fyfe
    Dorothy Yeboah-Manu
    Microbial Ecology, 2017, 74 : 350 - 361
  • [5] A protocol for culturing environmental strains of the Buruli ulcer agent, Mycobacterium ulcerans
    Zingue, Dezemon
    Panda, Arup
    Drancourt, Michel
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [6] A protocol for culturing environmental strains of the Buruli ulcer agent, Mycobacterium ulcerans
    Dezemon Zingue
    Arup Panda
    Michel Drancourt
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [7] Evidences of the Low Implication of Mosquitoes in the Transmission of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the Causative Agent of Buruli Ulcer
    Djouaka, Rousseau
    Zeukeng, Francis
    Bigoga, Jude Daiga
    Coulibaly, David N'golo
    Tchigossou, Genevieve
    Akoton, Romaric
    Aboubacar, Sylla
    Tchebe, Sodjinin Jean-Eudes
    Nguepdjo, Clavella Nantcho
    Adeoti, Razack
    Djegbe, Innocent
    Tamo, Manuele
    Mbacham, Wilfred Fon
    Kakou-Ngazoa, Solange E.
    Ablordey, Anthony
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES & MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 2017
  • [8] Evidences of the low implication of mosquitoes in the transmission of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of Buruli ulcer
    Zeukeng, F.
    Djouaka, R.
    Bigoga, J.
    Adeoti, R.
    Tamo, M.
    Mbacham, W. F.
    Kakou-Ngazoa, S.
    Ablordey, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 73 : 74 - 74
  • [9] Effects of Decontamination, DNA Extraction, and Amplification Procedures on the Molecular Diagnosis of Mycobacterium ulcerans Disease (Buruli Ulcer)
    Affolabi, Dissou
    Sanoussi, N'Dira
    Vandelannoote, Koen
    Odoun, Mathieu
    Faihun, Frank
    Sopoh, Ghislain
    Anagonou, Severin
    Portaels, Francoise
    Eddyani, Miriam
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 50 (04) : 1195 - 1198
  • [10] Mosquitoes spread the Buruli ulcer agent Mycobacterium ulcerans
    Nature Microbiology, 2024, 9 : 320 - 321