A comparison of DNA extraction procedures for the detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of Buruli ulcer, in clinical and environmental specimens

被引:27
|
作者
Durnez, Lies [1 ,2 ]
Stragier, Pieter [1 ]
Roebben, Karen [1 ]
Ablordey, Anthony [1 ,3 ]
Leirs, Herwig [2 ,4 ]
Portaels, Francoise [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Trop Med, Mycobacteriol Unit, Dept Microbiol, Inst Trop Med, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp, Evolutionary Ecol Grp, Dept Biol, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Noguchi Mem Inst Med Res, Dept Bacteriol, Accra, Ghana
[4] Univ Aarhus, Danish Pest Infestat Lab, Fac Agr Sci, Dept Integrat Pest Management, Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
Buruli ulcer; Clinical specimens; DNA extraction; Environmental specimens; Modified Boom; Mycobacterium ulcerans; PCR; SEQUENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.mimet.2008.10.002
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Mycobacterium ulcerans is the causative agent of Buruli ulcer, the third most common mycobacterial disease in humans after tuberculosis and leprosy. Although the disease is associated with aquatic ecosystems, cultivation of the bacillus from the environment is difficult to achieve. Therefore, at the moment, research is based on the detection by PCR of the insertion sequence IS2404 present in M. ulcerans and some closely related mycobacteria. In the present study, we compared four DNA extraction methods for detection of M. ulcerans DNA, namely the one tube cell lysis and DNA extraction procedure (OT), the FastPrep procedure (FP), the modified Boom procedure (MB), and the Maxwell (R) 16 Procedure (M16). The methods were performed on serial dilutions of M. ulcerans, followed by PCR analysis with different PCR targets in M. ulcerans to determine the detection limit (DL) of each method. The purity of the extracted DNA and the time and effort needed were compared as well. All methods were performed on environmental specimens and the two best methods (MB and M16) were tested on clinical specimens for detection of M. ulcerans DNA. When comparing the DLs of the DNA extraction methods, the MB and M16 had a significantly lower DL than the OT and FP. For the different PCR targets, IS2404 showed a significantly lower DL than mlsA, MIRU1, MIRU5 and VNTR6. The FP and M16 were considerably faster than the MB and OT, while the purity of the DNA extracted with the MB was significantly higher than the DNA extracted with the other methods. The MB performed best on the environmental and clinical specimens. This comparative study shows that the modified Boom procedure, although lengthy, provides a better method of DNA extraction than the other methods tested for detection and identification of M. ulcerans in both clinical and environmental specimens. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 158
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental transmission of Mycobacterium ulcerans drives dynamics of Buruli ulcer in endemic regions of Cameroon
    Andrés Garchitorena
    Calistus N. Ngonghala
    Gaëtan Texier
    Jordi Landier
    Sara Eyangoh
    Matthew H. Bonds
    Jean-François Guégan
    Benjamin Roche
    Scientific Reports, 5
  • [22] Detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans subsp shinshuense DNA from a water channel in familial Buruli ulcer cases in Japan
    Luo, Yuqian
    Degang, Yang
    Ohtsuka, Mikio
    Ishido, Yuko
    Ishii, Norihisa
    Suzuki, Koichi
    FUTURE MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 10 (04) : 461 - 469
  • [23] Clinical considerations on Buruli ulcer employing two molecular tests for the detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans in 100 skin biopsies
    Leigheb, Giorgio
    Zavattaro, Elisa
    Molicotti, Paola
    Cannas, Sara
    Zanetti, Stephania
    Clemente, Claudio
    Johnson, Roch C.
    Sopoh, Ghislain E.
    Dossou, Ange D.
    Colombo, Enrico
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 53 (02) : 213 - 220
  • [24] Environmental and health-related risk factors for Mycobacterium ulcerans disease (Buruli ulcer) in Benin
    Nackers, Fabienne
    Johnson, Roch C.
    Glynn, Judith R.
    Zinsou, Claude
    Tonglet, Rene
    Portaels, Francoise
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2007, 77 (05): : 834 - 836
  • [25] Short Report: Clinical and Molecular Evidence for a Case of Buruli Ulcer (Mycobacterium ulcerans Infection) in Kenya
    Walsh, Douglas S.
    Eyase, Fredrick
    Onyango, David
    Odindo, Alfred
    Otieno, Walter
    Waitumbi, John N.
    Bulimo, Wallace D.
    Schnabel, David C.
    Meyers, Wayne M.
    Portaels, Francoise
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2009, 81 (06): : 1110 - 1113
  • [26] Amoebae as Potential Environmental Hosts for Mycobacterium ulcerans and Other Mycobacteria, but Doubtful Actors in Buruli Ulcer Epidemiology
    Gryseels, Sophie
    Amissah, Diana
    Durnez, Lies
    Vandelannoote, Koen
    Leirs, Herwig
    De Jonckheere, Johan
    Silva, Manuel T.
    Portaels, Francoise
    Ablordey, Anthony
    Eddyani, Miriam
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2012, 6 (08):
  • [27] Mycobacterium ulcerans DNA Not Detected in Faecal Samples from Buruli Ulcer Patients: Results of a Pilot Study
    Sarfo, Fred S.
    Lavender, Caroline J.
    Fyfe, Janet A. M.
    Johnson, Paul D. R.
    Stinear, Timothy P.
    Phillips, Richard O.
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (05):
  • [28] Mycobacterium ulcerans DNA in Bandicoot Excreta in Buruli Ulcer-Endemic Area, Northern Queensland, Australia
    Roltgen, Katharina
    Pluschke, Gerd
    Johnson, Paul D. R.
    Fyfe, Janet
    EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 23 (12) : 2042 - 2045
  • [29] Multicenter External Quality Assessment Program for PCR Detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans in Clinical and Environmental Specimens
    Eddyani, Miriam
    Lavender, Caroline
    de Rijk, Willem Bram
    Bomans, Pieter
    Fyfe, Janet
    de Jong, Bouke
    Portaels, Francoise
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02):
  • [30] Comparison of Mycobacterium ulcerans (Buruli ulcer) and Leptospira sp. (Leptospirosis) dynamics in urban and rural settings
    Combe, Marine
    Gozlan, Rodolphe Elie
    Jagadesh, Soushieta
    Velvin, Camilla Jensen
    Ruffine, Rolland
    Demar, Magalie Pierre
    Couppie, Pierre
    Djossou, Felix
    Nacher, Mathieu
    Epelboin, Loic
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2019, 13 (01):