Comparison of the Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Patients with Non-ischaemic and Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy

被引:8
|
作者
Ioannou, Adam [1 ]
Metaxa, Sofia [2 ]
Simon, Steny [2 ]
Mandal, Amit K. J. [2 ]
Missouris, Constantinos G. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Free NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[2] Wexham Pk Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Wexham St, Slough, Berks, England
[3] Univ Cyprus, Sch Med, Nicosia, Cyprus
关键词
Heart failure; Cardiomyopathy; Ejection fraction; Sacubitril; valsartan; EJECTION FRACTION IMPROVEMENT; CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE; NATRIURETIC-PEPTIDE; INHIBITION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; DYSFUNCTION; MECHANISMS; CARVEDILOL; GUIDELINES; ENALAPRIL;
D O I
10.1007/s10557-020-07036-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose Sacubitril/valsartan has been demonstrated to improve prognosis and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. We sought to compare the improvement in cardiac function between non-ischaemic and ischaemic cardiomyopathy for patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan. Methods We conducted a single centre prospective cohort survey of patients reviewed in the Heart Function Clinic between February 2017 and January 2018. Functional evaluation and measurement of biochemical and echocardiographic parameters occurred before the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan, and after 3 months of treatment. Results We identified 52 patients (26 non-ischaemic and 26 ischaemic cardiomyopathy) suitable for treatment with sacubitril/valsartan. Treatment was followed by a significant decrease in a New York Heart Association (NYHA) class in both patients with non-ischaemic (2.3 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.7,P < 0.001) and ischaemic cardiomyopathy (2.3 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.6,P < 0.001), along with an increase in ejection fraction in both patients with non-ischaemic (26.2% +/- 6.5% vs. 37.2% +/- 13.8%,P < 0.001) and ischaemic cardiomyopathy (28.1% +/- 5.7% vs. 31.5% +/- 8.4%,P = 0.007). The improvement in ejection fraction was significantly greater in the patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy compared to those with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (10.7% +/- 13.0% vs. 3.9% +/- 6.0%,P = 0.023). Conclusion Our study suggests that treatment with sacubitril/valsartan in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy is followed by a greater improvement in ejection fraction than in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 762
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Propensity score-matched analysis in isolated left ventricular dilation and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy
    Goncalves, T.
    Pezel, T.
    Garot, P.
    Toupin, S.
    Duhamel, S.
    Sanguineti, F.
    Unterseeh, T.
    Hovasse, T.
    Gall, E.
    Hamzi, L.
    Unger, A.
    Dillinger, J. G.
    Henry, P.
    Bousson, V
    Garot, J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45
  • [42] Incidence of left ventricular function improvement after primary prevention ICD implantation for non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a multicentre experience
    Verma, Atul
    Wulffhart, Zaev
    Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya
    Khaykin, Yaariv
    Kaplan, Alexander
    Sarak, Bradley
    Biria, Mazda
    Pillarisetti, Jayasree
    Bhat, Pradeep
    Di Biase, Luigi
    Constantini, Otto
    Quan, Kara
    Natale, Andrea
    HEART, 2010, 96 (07) : 510 - 515
  • [43] Left atrial booster pump function is an independent predictor of subsequent life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy
    Negishi, Kazuaki
    Negishi, Tomoko
    Zardkoohi, Omeed
    Ching, Elizabeth A.
    Basu, Nivedita
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    Popovic, Zoran B.
    Marwick, Thomas H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2016, 17 (10) : 1153 - 1160
  • [44] Ischaemic vs non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy: The value of nuclear cardiology techniques
    Caobelli, Federico
    Bengel, Frank M.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (05) : 971 - 974
  • [45] Ischaemic vs non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy: The value of nuclear cardiology techniques
    Federico Caobelli
    Frank M. Bengel
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2015, 22 : 971 - 974
  • [46] Exercise stress echocardiography differentiates ischaemic from non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy
    Monserrat, L
    Peteiro, J
    Calviño, R
    Vazquez, JM
    Vazquez, E
    Perez, R
    Salgado, J
    Castro-Beiras, A
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 23 : 549 - 549
  • [47] Association of secondary mitral regurgitation and right ventricular dysfunction among patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy
    Tayal, Bhupendar
    Faza, Nadeen N.
    Nguyen, Duc T.
    Malahfji, Maan
    Little, Stephen
    Saeed, Mujtaba
    Goel, Sachin S.
    Guha, Ashrith
    El-Tallawi, Kinan Carlos
    Graviss, Edward A.
    Shah, Dipan J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2024, 25 (12) : 1627 - 1635
  • [48] Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischaemic Versus Non-Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kanagaratnam, Aran
    Virk, Sohaib A.
    Pham, Timmy
    Anderson, Robert D.
    Turnbull, Samual
    Campbell, Timothy
    Bennett, Richard
    Thomas, Stuart P.
    Lee, Geoffrey
    Kumar, Saurabh
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2022, 31 (08): : 1064 - 1074
  • [49] Recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy: evidence-based predictors
    Dulak, Elzbieta
    Lubinski, Andrzej
    Bissinger, Andrzej
    Przybylski, Andrzej
    Sterlinski, Maciej
    Filipecki, Artur
    Pazdyga, Anna
    Zienciuk, Agnieszka
    Kempa, Maciej
    Krolak, Tomasz
    Szwed, Hanna
    Trusz-Gluza, Maria
    Kargul, Wlodzimierz
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2009, 67 (08) : 837 - 846
  • [50] Mechanisms and impact on cardiac mortality of right ventricular dysfunction in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy
    Pueschner, A.
    Chattranukulchai, P.
    Heitner, J. F.
    Shah, D. J.
    Hayes, B.
    Rehwald, W.
    Parker, M. A.
    Kim, H. W.
    Judd, R. M.
    Kim, R. J.
    Klem, I.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 1249 - 1249