Comparison of the Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Patients with Non-ischaemic and Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy

被引:8
|
作者
Ioannou, Adam [1 ]
Metaxa, Sofia [2 ]
Simon, Steny [2 ]
Mandal, Amit K. J. [2 ]
Missouris, Constantinos G. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Free NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[2] Wexham Pk Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Wexham St, Slough, Berks, England
[3] Univ Cyprus, Sch Med, Nicosia, Cyprus
关键词
Heart failure; Cardiomyopathy; Ejection fraction; Sacubitril; valsartan; EJECTION FRACTION IMPROVEMENT; CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE; NATRIURETIC-PEPTIDE; INHIBITION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; DYSFUNCTION; MECHANISMS; CARVEDILOL; GUIDELINES; ENALAPRIL;
D O I
10.1007/s10557-020-07036-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose Sacubitril/valsartan has been demonstrated to improve prognosis and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. We sought to compare the improvement in cardiac function between non-ischaemic and ischaemic cardiomyopathy for patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan. Methods We conducted a single centre prospective cohort survey of patients reviewed in the Heart Function Clinic between February 2017 and January 2018. Functional evaluation and measurement of biochemical and echocardiographic parameters occurred before the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan, and after 3 months of treatment. Results We identified 52 patients (26 non-ischaemic and 26 ischaemic cardiomyopathy) suitable for treatment with sacubitril/valsartan. Treatment was followed by a significant decrease in a New York Heart Association (NYHA) class in both patients with non-ischaemic (2.3 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.7,P < 0.001) and ischaemic cardiomyopathy (2.3 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.6,P < 0.001), along with an increase in ejection fraction in both patients with non-ischaemic (26.2% +/- 6.5% vs. 37.2% +/- 13.8%,P < 0.001) and ischaemic cardiomyopathy (28.1% +/- 5.7% vs. 31.5% +/- 8.4%,P = 0.007). The improvement in ejection fraction was significantly greater in the patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy compared to those with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (10.7% +/- 13.0% vs. 3.9% +/- 6.0%,P = 0.023). Conclusion Our study suggests that treatment with sacubitril/valsartan in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy is followed by a greater improvement in ejection fraction than in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 762
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Differentiation of ischaemic from non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy during dobutamine stress: comparison of left-ventricular long axis function with standard wall motion analysis
    Duncan, A
    O'Sullivan, C
    Gibson, DG
    Henein, MY
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 : 490 - 490
  • [22] Multimodality Imaging to Guide Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients with Non-ischaemic Cardiomyopathy
    Kuo, Ling
    Liang, Jackson J.
    Nazarian, Sarnan
    Marchlinski, Francis E.
    ARRHYTHMIA & ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY REVIEW, 2019, 8 (04) : 255 - 264
  • [23] Left ventricular function improvement after prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy
    Grimm, Wolfram
    Timmesfeld, Nina
    Efimova, Elena
    EUROPACE, 2013, 15 (11): : 1594 - 1600
  • [24] Combined evaluation of right ventricular function using echocardiography in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy
    Ishiwata, Jumpei
    Daimon, Masao
    Nakanishi, Koki
    Sugimoto, Tadafumi
    Kawata, Takayuki
    Shinozaki, Tomohiro
    Nakao, Tomoko
    Hirokawa, Megumi
    Sawada, Naoko
    Yoshida, Yuriko
    Amiya, Eisuke
    Hatano, Masaru
    Morita, Hiroyuki
    Yatomi, Yutaka
    Komuro, Issei
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2021, 8 (05): : 3947 - 3956
  • [25] Global longitudinal strain is associated with mortality in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and recovered left ventricular ejection fraction
    Marco, Merlo
    Mase, Marco
    Perry, Andrew
    La Franca, Eluisa
    Deych, Elena
    Boscutti, Andrea
    Gobbo, Marco
    Stolfo, Davide
    Clemenza, Francesco
    Gorcsan, John
    Bellavia, Diego
    Clemenza, Francesco
    Sinagra, Ginafranco
    Adamo, Luigi
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2020, 22 (0N) : N126 - N126
  • [26] Effect of revascularizing viable myocardium on left ventricular diastolic function in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy
    Carluccio, Erberto
    Biagioli, Paolo
    Alunni, Gianfranco
    Murrone, Adriano
    Leonelli, Valeria
    Pantano, Paola
    Vincenti, Gabriella
    Giombolini, Claudio
    Ragni, Temistocle
    Reboldi, Gianpaolo
    Gentile, Federico
    Ambrosio, Giuseppe
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (12) : 1501 - 1509
  • [27] Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy: where are we today? A clinical review
    Wissner, Erik
    Stevenson, William G.
    Kuck, Karl-Heinz
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (12) : 1440 - +
  • [28] The role of carotid atherosclerosis in the distinction between ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy
    Androulakis, AE
    Andrikopoulos, GK
    Richter, DJ
    Tentolouris, CA
    Avgeropoulou, CC
    Adamopoulos, DA
    Toutouzas, PK
    Trikas, AG
    Stefanadis, CI
    Gialafos, JE
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 21 (11) : 919 - 926
  • [29] Left ventricular ejection fraction assessment using long-axis CMR images is accurate in both ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy
    America, Raffaella
    Scatteia, Alessandra
    Pascale, Carmine Emanuele
    Guarini, Pasquale
    Dellegrottaglie, Santo
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2019, 21 (0J) : J72 - J72
  • [30] Differentiation of ischaemic and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy in patients with global systolic left ventricular dysfunction
    Pellerin, DE
    Sharma, RS
    Larrazet, F
    Elliott, PM
    McKenna, WJ
    Veyrat, C
    CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (17) : 555 - 555