Dynamics in the global protected-area estate since 2004

被引:69
|
作者
Lewis, Edward [1 ]
MacSharry, Brian [1 ]
Juffe-Bignoli, Diego [1 ]
Harris, Nyeema [2 ]
Burrows, Georgina [3 ]
Kingston, Naomi [1 ]
Burgess, Neil D. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UN Environm World Conservat Monitoring Ctr, 219 Huntingdon Rd, Cambridge CB3 ODL, England
[2] Luc Hoffmann Inst, Rue Mauverney 28, CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Geog, Downing Pl, Cambridge CB2 3EN, England
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Nat Hist Museum, Ctr Macroecol Evolut & Climate, Bldg 3,2Nd Floor, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Aichi target 11; coverage; protected area; protected area downgrading downsizing degazettement; World Database on Protected Areas; DEGAZETTEMENT PADDD; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.13056
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Nations of the world have committed to a number of goals and targets to address global environmental challenges. Protected areas have for centuries been a key strategy in conservation and play a major role in addressing current challenges. The most important tool used to track progress on protected-area commitments is the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Periodic assessments of the world's protected-area estate show steady growth over the last 2 decades. However, the current method, which uses the latest version of the WDPA, does not show the true dynamic nature of protected areas over time and does not provide information on sites removed from the WDPA. In reality, this method can only show growth or remain stable. We used GIS tools in an approach to assess protected-area change over time based on 12 temporally distinct versions of the WDPA that quantify area added and removed from the WDPA annually from 2004 to 2016. Both the narrative of continual growth of protected area and the counter-narrative of protected area removal were overly simplistic. The former because growth was almost entirely in the marine realm and the latter because some areas removed were reprotected in later years. On average 2.5 million km(2) was added to the WDPA annually and 1.1 million km(2) was removed. Reasons for the inclusion and removal of protected areas in the WDPA database were in part due to data-quality issues but also to on-the-ground changes. To meet the 17% protected-area component of Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 by 2020, which stood at 14.7% in 2016, either the rate of protected-area removal must decrease or the rate of protected-area designation and addition to the WDPA must increase.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 579
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Globalization and multi-spatial trends in the coverage of protected-area conservation (1980-2000)
    Zimmerer, KS
    Galt, RE
    Buck, MV
    AMBIO, 2004, 33 (08) : 520 - 529
  • [42] Protected-area targets could be undermined by climate change-driven shifts in ecoregions and biomes
    Dobrowski, Solomon Z.
    Littlefield, Caitlin E.
    Lyons, Drew S.
    Hollenberg, Clark
    Carroll, Carlos
    Parks, Sean A.
    Abatzoglou, John T.
    Hegewisch, Katherine
    Gage, Josh
    COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 2 (01):
  • [43] Effects of noncompliance on the success of alternative designs of marine protected-area networks for conservation and fisheries management
    Kritzer, JP
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (04) : 1021 - 1031
  • [44] Measuring Protected-Area Isolation and Correlations of Isolation with Land-Use Intensity and Protection Status
    Seiferling, Ian S.
    Proulx, Raphael
    Peres-Neto, Pedro R.
    Fahrig, Lenore
    Messier, Christian
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2012, 26 (04) : 610 - 618
  • [45] Beyond total area protected: A new set of metrics to measure progress in building a robust protected area estate
    Cook, Carly N.
    Valkan, Rebecca S.
    McGeoch, Melodie A.
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2019, 58
  • [46] Effects of cost metric on cost-effectiveness of protected-area network design in urban landscapes
    Burkhalter, J. C.
    Lockwood, J. L.
    Maslo, B.
    Fenn, K. H.
    Leu, K.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2016, 30 (02) : 403 - 412
  • [47] The performance of protected-area expansions in representing tropical Andean species: past trends and climate change prospects
    Javier Fajardo
    Janeth Lessmann
    Christian Devenish
    Elisa Bonaccorso
    Ángel M. Felicísimo
    Fernando J. M. Rojas-Runjaic
    Haidy Rojas
    Miguel Lentino
    Jesús Muñoz
    Rubén G. Mateo
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [48] Hazards of Collaboration: Local State Co-optation of a New Protected-Area Model in Southwest China
    Zinda, John Aloysius
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2012, 25 (04) : 384 - 399
  • [49] The performance of protected-area expansions in representing tropical Andean species: past trends and climate change prospects
    Fajardo, Javier
    Lessmann, Janeth
    Devenish, Christian
    Bonaccorso, Elisa
    Felicisimo, angel M.
    Rojas-Runjaic, Fernando J. M.
    Rojas, Haidy
    Lentino, Miguel
    Munoz, Jesus
    Mateo, Ruben G.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [50] ASSESSING LANDSCAPE DYNAMICS IN A PROTECTED AREA
    FRIEDMAN, SK
    ZUBE, EH
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1992, 16 (03) : 363 - 370