Dynamics in the global protected-area estate since 2004

被引:69
|
作者
Lewis, Edward [1 ]
MacSharry, Brian [1 ]
Juffe-Bignoli, Diego [1 ]
Harris, Nyeema [2 ]
Burrows, Georgina [3 ]
Kingston, Naomi [1 ]
Burgess, Neil D. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UN Environm World Conservat Monitoring Ctr, 219 Huntingdon Rd, Cambridge CB3 ODL, England
[2] Luc Hoffmann Inst, Rue Mauverney 28, CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Geog, Downing Pl, Cambridge CB2 3EN, England
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Nat Hist Museum, Ctr Macroecol Evolut & Climate, Bldg 3,2Nd Floor, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Aichi target 11; coverage; protected area; protected area downgrading downsizing degazettement; World Database on Protected Areas; DEGAZETTEMENT PADDD; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.13056
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Nations of the world have committed to a number of goals and targets to address global environmental challenges. Protected areas have for centuries been a key strategy in conservation and play a major role in addressing current challenges. The most important tool used to track progress on protected-area commitments is the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Periodic assessments of the world's protected-area estate show steady growth over the last 2 decades. However, the current method, which uses the latest version of the WDPA, does not show the true dynamic nature of protected areas over time and does not provide information on sites removed from the WDPA. In reality, this method can only show growth or remain stable. We used GIS tools in an approach to assess protected-area change over time based on 12 temporally distinct versions of the WDPA that quantify area added and removed from the WDPA annually from 2004 to 2016. Both the narrative of continual growth of protected area and the counter-narrative of protected area removal were overly simplistic. The former because growth was almost entirely in the marine realm and the latter because some areas removed were reprotected in later years. On average 2.5 million km(2) was added to the WDPA annually and 1.1 million km(2) was removed. Reasons for the inclusion and removal of protected areas in the WDPA database were in part due to data-quality issues but also to on-the-ground changes. To meet the 17% protected-area component of Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 by 2020, which stood at 14.7% in 2016, either the rate of protected-area removal must decrease or the rate of protected-area designation and addition to the WDPA must increase.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 579
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficiency of a Protected-Area Network in a Mediterranean Region: A Multispecies Assessment with Raptors
    Abellan, Maria D.
    Martinez, Jose E.
    Palazon, Jose A.
    Esteve, Miguel A.
    Calvo, Jose F.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 47 (05) : 983 - 991
  • [22] Status review of the protected-area system in Myanmar, with recommendations for conservation planning
    Rao, M
    Rabinowitz, M
    Khaing, ST
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (02) : 360 - 368
  • [23] Road-network agglomeration, road density, and protected-area fragmentation
    Heidi J. Albers
    Amy W. Ando
    Meidan Bu
    Michael G. Wing
    Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 2012, 5 (3) : 137 - 150
  • [24] Climate change exposure and vulnerability of the global protected area estate from an international perspective
    Hoffmann, Samuel
    Beierkuhnlein, Carl
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2020, 26 (11) : 1496 - 1509
  • [25] Measuring protected-area effectiveness using vertebrate distributions from leech iDNA
    Ji, Yinqiu
    Baker, Christopher C. M.
    Popescu, Viorel D.
    Wang, Jiaxin
    Wu, Chunying
    Wang, Zhengyang
    Li, Yuanheng
    Wang, Lin
    Hua, Chaolang
    Yang, Zhongxing
    Yang, Chunyan
    Xu, Charles C. Y.
    Diana, Alex
    Wen, Qingzhong
    Pierce, Naomi E.
    Yu, Douglas W.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [26] Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on biodiversity: A major issue of protected-area management in Nepal
    Basnet, K
    LAND USE CHANGE AND MOUNTAIN BIODIVERSITY, 2006, : 293 - 306
  • [27] Trophic cascades in benthic marine ecosystems: lessons for fisheries and protected-area management
    Pinnegar, JK
    Polunin, NVC
    Francour, P
    Badalamenti, F
    Chemello, R
    Harmelin-Vivien, ML
    Hereu, B
    Milazzo, M
    Zabala, M
    D'Anna, G
    Pipitone, C
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2000, 27 (02) : 179 - 200
  • [28] STRENGTHENING PROTECTED-AREA MANAGEMENT - A FOCUS FOR THE 1990S, A PLATFORM FOR THE FUTURE
    CHILD, G
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 1994, 3 (05) : 459 - 463
  • [29] Evolving Protected-Area Impacts in Mexico: Political Shifts as Suggested by Impact Evaluations
    Pfaff, Alexander
    Santiago-Avila, Francisco
    Joppa, Lucas
    FORESTS, 2017, 8 (01):
  • [30] Financial costs and shortfalls of managing and expanding protected-area systems in developing countries
    Bruner, AG
    Gullison, RE
    Balmford, A
    BIOSCIENCE, 2004, 54 (12) : 1119 - 1126