Sparse Identification of Motor Learning Using Proxy Process Models

被引:0
|
作者
Parmar, Pritesh N. [1 ,2 ]
Patton, James L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Richard & Loan Hill Dept Bioengn, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Shirley Ryan Abil Lab, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ERROR; ADAPTATION; STROKE; DYNAMICS; RECOVERY; ARM; TRANSFORMATION; COORDINATION; INDIVIDUALS; MOVEMENTS;
D O I
10.1109/icorr.2019.8779423
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Enhanced neurorehabilitation using robotic and virtual-reality technologies requires a computational framework that can readily assess the time course of motor learning in order to recommend optimal training conditions. Error-feedback plays an important role in the acquisition of motor skills for goal-directed movements by facilitating the learning of internal models. In this study, we investigated changes in movement errors during sparse and intermittent "catch" (no-vision) trials, which served as a "proxy" of the underlying process of internal model formations. We trained 15 healthy subjects to reach for visual targets under eight distinct visuomotor distortions, and we removed visual feedback (no vision) intermittently. We tested their learning data from novision trials against our so-called proxy process models, which assumed linear, affine, and second-order model structures. In order to handle sparse (no-vision) observations, we allowed the proxy process models to either update trial-to-trial, predicting across voids of sparse samples or update sample-to-sample, disregarding the trial gaps. We exhaustively cross-validated our models across subjects and across learning tasks. The results revealed that the second-order model with trial-to-trial update best predicted the proxy process of visuomotor learning.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 860
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Identification of Phishing URLs Using Machine Learning Models
    Vivek, Meghashyam
    Premjith, Nithin
    Johnson, Aaron Antonio
    Maurya, Ashutosh Kumar
    Jingle, I. Diana Jeba
    FOURTH CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, VOL 3, CIS 2023, 2024, 865 : 209 - 219
  • [32] Self-optimizing cutting process using learning process models
    Denkena, Berend
    Dittrich, Marc-Andre
    Uhlich, Florian
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM-INTEGRATED INTELLIGENCE: NEW CHALLENGES FOR PRODUCT AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2016, 26 : 221 - 226
  • [33] Bayesian learning using Gaussian process for gas identification
    Bermak, Amine
    Belhouari, Sofiane Brahim
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2006, 55 (03) : 787 - 792
  • [34] Identification of a multivariate fermentation process using constructive learning
    Meleiro, LAC
    Campello, RJGB
    Maciel, R
    Von Zuben, FJ
    VII BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON NEURAL NETWORKS, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 19 - 24
  • [35] Models of Motor Learning Generalization
    Parmar, Pritesh N.
    Patton, James L.
    2018 40TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2018, : 4714 - 4719
  • [36] Sparse Bayesian Identification of Polynomial NARX Models
    Jacobs, William R.
    Baldacchino, Tara
    Anderson, Sean R.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2015, 48 (28): : 172 - 177
  • [37] Blind System Identification Using Sparse Learning for TDOA Estimation of Room Reflections
    Kowalczyk, Konrad
    Habets, Emanuel A. P.
    Kellermann, Walter
    Naylor, Patrick A.
    IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2013, 20 (07) : 653 - 656
  • [38] Models of the cerebellum and motor learning
    Houk, JC
    Buckingham, JT
    Barto, AG
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1996, 19 (03) : 368 - +
  • [39] Sparse model identification and learning for ultra-high-dimensional additive partially linear models
    Li, Xinyi
    Wang, Li
    Nettleton, Dan
    JOURNAL OF MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, 2019, 173 : 204 - 228
  • [40] Enhancing Sparse Index-Tracking Portfolios Using Deep Learning Models
    Carlos Andres Zapata Quimbayo
    Daniel Aragón Urrego
    John Freddy Moreno Trujillo
    Oscar Eduardo Reyes Nieto
    SN Computer Science, 6 (3)