Sparse Identification of Motor Learning Using Proxy Process Models

被引:0
|
作者
Parmar, Pritesh N. [1 ,2 ]
Patton, James L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Richard & Loan Hill Dept Bioengn, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Shirley Ryan Abil Lab, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ERROR; ADAPTATION; STROKE; DYNAMICS; RECOVERY; ARM; TRANSFORMATION; COORDINATION; INDIVIDUALS; MOVEMENTS;
D O I
10.1109/icorr.2019.8779423
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Enhanced neurorehabilitation using robotic and virtual-reality technologies requires a computational framework that can readily assess the time course of motor learning in order to recommend optimal training conditions. Error-feedback plays an important role in the acquisition of motor skills for goal-directed movements by facilitating the learning of internal models. In this study, we investigated changes in movement errors during sparse and intermittent "catch" (no-vision) trials, which served as a "proxy" of the underlying process of internal model formations. We trained 15 healthy subjects to reach for visual targets under eight distinct visuomotor distortions, and we removed visual feedback (no vision) intermittently. We tested their learning data from novision trials against our so-called proxy process models, which assumed linear, affine, and second-order model structures. In order to handle sparse (no-vision) observations, we allowed the proxy process models to either update trial-to-trial, predicting across voids of sparse samples or update sample-to-sample, disregarding the trial gaps. We exhaustively cross-validated our models across subjects and across learning tasks. The results revealed that the second-order model with trial-to-trial update best predicted the proxy process of visuomotor learning.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 860
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of Manufacturing Process Sequences, Using Machine Learning on Intermediate Product States (as Process Proxy Data)
    Wuest, Thorsten
    Irgens, Christopher
    Thoben, Klaus-Dieter
    ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: COMPETITIVE MANUFACTURING FOR INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, AMPS 2012, PT II, 2013, 398 : 1 - 8
  • [22] On the sparse Bayesian learning of linear models
    Yee, Chia Chye
    Atchade, Yves F.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2017, 46 (15) : 7672 - 7691
  • [23] On Learning Mixture Models with Sparse Parameters
    Mazumdar, Arya
    Pal, Soumyabrata
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 151, 2022, 151
  • [24] Learning sparse multiple cause models
    Naphade, M
    Frey, B
    Chen, L
    Huang, T
    15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS: PATTERN RECOGNITION AND NEURAL NETWORKS, 2000, : 642 - 647
  • [25] Learning to Discover Sparse Graphical Models
    Belilovsky, Eugene
    Kastner, Kyle
    Varoquaux, Gad
    Blaschko, Matthew B.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 70, 2017, 70
  • [26] Learning Hidden Markov Sparse Models
    Li, Lin
    Scaglione, Anna
    2013 INFORMATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS WORKSHOP (ITA), 2013,
  • [27] Recursive Learning for Sparse Markov Models
    Xiong, Jie
    Jaaskinen, Vaino
    Corander, Jukka
    BAYESIAN ANALYSIS, 2016, 11 (01): : 247 - 263
  • [28] Learning Compositional Sparse Bimodal Models
    Kumar, Suren
    Dhiman, Vikas
    Koch, Parker A.
    Corso, Jason J.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 40 (05) : 1032 - 1044
  • [29] Identification of FIR Models for LTI Multiscale Systems using Sparse Optimization Techniques
    Pinnamaraju, Vivek S.
    Tangirala, Arun K.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (01): : 542 - 547
  • [30] Speaker identification using a novel combination of sparse representation and Gaussian mixture models
    Ma Yunjie
    AUTOMATIC CONTROL AND MECHATRONIC ENGINEERING III, 2014, 615 : 265 - 269