A spatially structured adaptive two-stage model for retrieving ground-level PM2.5 concentrations from VIIRS AOD in China

被引:53
|
作者
Yao, Fei [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Jiansheng [1 ,3 ]
Li, Weifeng [4 ,5 ]
Peng, Jian [3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Shenzhen Grad Sch, Key Lab Urban Habitat Environm Sci & Technol, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch GeoSci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Minist Educ, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Urban Planning & Design, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Inst Res & Innovat, Shenzhen 518075, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PM2.5; VIIRS AOD; Spatially structured adaptive; Two-stage model; China; AEROSOL OPTICAL DEPTH; LONG-TERM EXPOSURE; SATELLITE; POLLUTION; REGION; MODIS; GOCI;
D O I
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.03.011
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
While the aerosol optical depth (AOD) product from the Visible Infrared Imaging Suite (VIIRS) instrument has proven effective for estimating regional ground-level particle concentrations with aerodynamic diameters less than 2.5 mu m (PM2.5), its performance at larger spatial scales remains unclear. Despite the wide application of statistical models in building ground-level PM2.5 satellite remote sensing retrieval models, a limited number of studies have considered the spatiotemporal heterogeneities for model structures. Taking China as the study area, we used the VIIRS AOD, together with multi-source auxiliary variables, to develop a spatially structured adaptive two-stage model to estimate ground-level PM2.5 concentrations at a 6-km spatial resolution. To this end, we first defined and calculated a dual distance from the ground-level PM2.5 monitoring data. We then applied the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic means on dual distances and obtained 13 spatial clusters. Subsequently, we combined the time fixed effects regression (TEFR) model and geographically weighted regression (GWR) model to develop the spatially structured adaptive two-stage model. For each spatial cluster, we examined all possible combinations of auxiliary variables and determined the best model structure according to multiple statistical test results. Finally, we obtained the PM2.5 estimates through regression mapping. At least seven model-fitting data records per day made a good threshold that could best overcome the model overfitting induced by the second-stage GWR model at the minimum price of losing samples. The overall model fitting and ten-fold cross validation (CV) R-2 were 0.82 and 0.60, respectively, under that threshold. Model performances among different spatial clusters differed to a certain extent. High-CV R-2 values always exceeded 0.6 while low CV R-2 values less than 0.5 also existed. Both the size of the model-fitting data records and the extent of urban industrial characteristics of spatial clusters accounted for these differences. The PM2.5 estimates agreed well with the PM2.5 observations with correlation coefficients all exceeding 0.5 at the monthly, seasonal, and annual scales. East of Hu's line and north of the Yangtze River were characterized by high PM2.5 concentrations. This study contributes to the understanding of how well VIIRS AOD can retrieve ground-level PM2.5 concentrations at the national scale and strategies for building ground-level PM2.5 satellite remote sensing retrieval models.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 276
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentration using Landsat 8 in Chengdu, China
    Chen, Yunping
    Han, Weihong
    Chen, Shuzhong
    Tong, Ling
    REMOTE SENSING OF THE ATMOSPHERE, CLOUDS, AND PRECIPITATION V, 2014, 9259
  • [22] Impact and Suggestion of Column-to-Surface Vertical Correction Scheme on the Relationship between Satellite AOD and Ground-Level PM2.5 in China
    Gong, Wei
    Huang, Yusi
    Zhang, Tianhao
    Zhu, Zhongmin
    Ji, Yuxi
    Xiang, Hao
    REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (10)
  • [23] Estimation of ground-level PM2.5concentration using MODIS AOD and corrected regression model over Beijing, China
    Xu, Xinghan
    Zhang, Chengkun
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [24] Estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations in the southeastern US using geographically weighted regression
    Hu, Xuefei
    Waller, Lance A.
    Al-Hamdan, Mohammad Z.
    Crosson, William L.
    Estes, Maurice G., Jr.
    Estes, Sue M.
    Quattrochi, Dale A.
    Sarnat, Jeremy A.
    Liu, Yang
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2013, 121 : 1 - 10
  • [25] Influence of Local Circulation on Short-term Variations in Ground-level PM2.5 Concentrations
    Lee, Su Jeong
    Lee, Sang-Hyun
    Choi, Hyung-Jin
    Kim, Joowan
    Kim, Maeng-Ki
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (10)
  • [26] Daily estimation of ground-level PM2.5 concentrations at 4 km resolution over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei by fusing MODIS AOD and ground observations
    Lv, Baolei
    Hu, Yongtao
    Chang, Howard H.
    Russell, Armistead G.
    Cai, Jun
    Xu, Bing
    Bai, Yuqi
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 580 : 235 - 244
  • [27] Meteorological Parameters and Gaseous Pollutant Concentrations as Predictors of Ground-level PM2.5 Concentrations in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China
    Wang, Xinpeng
    Sun, Wenbin
    Wang, Zhen
    Wang, Yahui
    Ren, Hongkang
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (08) : 1844 - 1855
  • [28] Assimilating AOD retrievals from GOCI and VIIRS to forecast surface PM2.5 episodes over Eastern China
    Pang, Jiongming
    Liu, Zhiquan
    Wang, Xuemei
    Bresch, Jamie
    Ban, Junmei
    Cnen, Dan
    Kim, Jhoon
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 179 : 288 - 304
  • [29] Exploring spatiotemporal patterns of PM2.5 in China based on ground-level observations for 190 cities
    Zhang, Haifeng
    Wang, Zhaohai
    Zhang, Wenzhong
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2016, 216 : 559 - 567
  • [30] Estimating Spatio-Temporal Variations of PM2.5 Concentrations Using VIIRS-Derived AOD in the Guanzhong Basin, China
    Zhang, Kainan
    de Leeuw, Gerrit
    Yang, Zhiqiang
    Chen, Xingfeng
    Su, Xiaoli
    Jiao, Jiashuang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (22)