'Too interconnected to fail' financial network of US CDS market: Topological fragility and systemic risk

被引:178
|
作者
Markose, Sheri [1 ]
Giansante, Simone [2 ]
Shaghaghi, Ali Rais [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Dept Econ, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
[2] Univ Bath, Sch Management, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[3] Univ Essex, CCFEA, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
关键词
Credit default swaps; Financial networks; Eigenvector centrality; Financial contagion; Systemic risk; Super-spreader tax; CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS; EXPOSURES; CONTAGION; LIQUIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2012.05.016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A small segment of credit default swaps (CDS) on residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) stand implicated in the 2007 financial crisis. The dominance of a few big players in the chains of insurance and reinsurance for CDS credit risk mitigation for banks' assets has led to the idea of too interconnected to fail (TITF) resulting, as in the case of AIG, of a tax payer bailout. We provide an empirical reconstruction of the US CDS network based on the FDIC Call Reports for off balance sheet bank data for the 4th quarter in 2007 and 2008. The propagation of financial contagion in networks with dense clustering which reflects high concentration or localization of exposures between few participants will be identified as one that is TITF. Those that dominate in terms of network centrality and connectivity are called 'super-spreaders'. Management of systemic risk from bank failure in uncorrelated random networks is different to those with clustering. As systemic risk of highly connected financial firms in the CDS (or any other) financial markets is not priced into their holding of capital and collateral, we design a super-spreader tax based on eigenvector centrality of the banks which can mitigate potential socialized losses. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 646
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Measuring systemic risk across financial market infrastructures
    Li, Fuchun
    Perez-Saiz, Hector
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2018, 34 : 1 - 11
  • [32] A financial network perspective of financial institutions' systemic risk contributions
    Huang, Wei-Qiang
    Zhuang, Xin-Tian
    Yao, Shuang
    Uryasev, Stan
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2016, 456 : 183 - 196
  • [33] Unraveling Systemic Risk Transmission: An Empirical Exploration of Network Dynamics and Market Liquidity in the Financial Sector
    Liu, Xin
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024,
  • [34] Systemic risk network of Chinese financial institutions
    Fang, Libing
    Sun, Boyang
    Li, Huijing
    Yu, Honghai
    EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2018, 35 : 190 - 206
  • [35] Diversification and Systemic Risk: A Financial Network Perspective
    Frey, Ruediger
    Hledik, Juraj
    RISKS, 2018, 6 (02):
  • [36] Network models of financial systemic risk: a review
    Caccioli F.
    Barucca P.
    Kobayashi T.
    Journal of Computational Social Science, 2018, 1 (1): : 81 - 114
  • [37] Too Connected to Fail: The Regulation of Systemic Risk within Australia's Superannuation System
    Donald, Scott
    Bateman, Hazel
    Buckley, Ross
    Liu, Kevin
    Nicholls, Rob
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REGULATION, 2016, 2 (01) : 56 - 78
  • [38] The transmission of US systemic financial stress: Evidence for emerging market economies
    Fink, Fabian
    Schueler, Yves S.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2015, 55 : 6 - 26
  • [39] Systemic risk and spatiotemporal dynamics of the US housing market
    Meng, Hao
    Xie, Wen-Jie
    Jiang, Zhi-Qiang
    Podobnik, Boris
    Zhou, Wei-Xing
    Stanley, H. Eugene
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2014, 4
  • [40] Systemic interest rate and market risk at US banks
    von la Hausse L.
    Rohleder M.
    Wilkens M.
    Journal of Business Economics, 2016, 86 (8) : 933 - 961