'Too interconnected to fail' financial network of US CDS market: Topological fragility and systemic risk

被引:178
|
作者
Markose, Sheri [1 ]
Giansante, Simone [2 ]
Shaghaghi, Ali Rais [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Dept Econ, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
[2] Univ Bath, Sch Management, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[3] Univ Essex, CCFEA, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
关键词
Credit default swaps; Financial networks; Eigenvector centrality; Financial contagion; Systemic risk; Super-spreader tax; CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS; EXPOSURES; CONTAGION; LIQUIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2012.05.016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A small segment of credit default swaps (CDS) on residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) stand implicated in the 2007 financial crisis. The dominance of a few big players in the chains of insurance and reinsurance for CDS credit risk mitigation for banks' assets has led to the idea of too interconnected to fail (TITF) resulting, as in the case of AIG, of a tax payer bailout. We provide an empirical reconstruction of the US CDS network based on the FDIC Call Reports for off balance sheet bank data for the 4th quarter in 2007 and 2008. The propagation of financial contagion in networks with dense clustering which reflects high concentration or localization of exposures between few participants will be identified as one that is TITF. Those that dominate in terms of network centrality and connectivity are called 'super-spreaders'. Management of systemic risk from bank failure in uncorrelated random networks is different to those with clustering. As systemic risk of highly connected financial firms in the CDS (or any other) financial markets is not priced into their holding of capital and collateral, we design a super-spreader tax based on eigenvector centrality of the banks which can mitigate potential socialized losses. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 646
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modelling the Cognitive Financial Group Interconnected Risk Network
    Ezzodin, Mahboobeh.
    Bahiraie, Alireza.
    Azhar, A. K. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NONLINEAR ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01): : 259 - 274
  • [22] Twelve Years after the Financial Crisis-Too-big-to-fail is still with us
    Hellwig, Martin
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REGULATION, 2021, 7 (01) : 175 - 187
  • [23] Market Volatility Spillover, Network Diffusion, and Financial Systemic Risk Management: Financial Modeling and Empirical Study
    Meng, Sun
    Chen, Yan
    MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (06)
  • [24] Financial network structure and systemic risk
    Huang, Chuangxia
    Deng, Yanchen
    Yang, Xiaoguang
    Cai, Yaqian
    Yang, Xin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2024, 30 (10): : 1073 - 1096
  • [25] Financial Network Systemic Risk Contributions
    Hautsch, Nikolaus
    Schaumburg, Julia
    Schienle, Melanie
    REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2015, 19 (02) : 685 - 738
  • [26] Ricci curvature: An economic indicator for market fragility and systemic risk
    Sandhu, Romeil S.
    Georgiou, Tryphon T.
    Tannenbaum, Allen R.
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2016, 2 (05):
  • [27] A closer look at 'too big to fail': national and international approaches to addressing the risks of large, interconnected financial institutions
    Greene, Edward F.
    McIlwain, Knox L.
    Scott, Jennifer T.
    CAPITAL MARKETS LAW JOURNAL, 2010, 5 (02) : 117 - 140
  • [28] An Optimization View of Financial Systemic Risk Modeling: Network Effect and Market Liquidity Effect
    Chen, Nan
    Liu, Xin
    Yao, David D.
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 64 (05) : 1089 - 1108
  • [29] Herding boosts too-connected-to-fail risk in stock market of China
    Lu, Shan
    Zhao, Jichang
    Wang, Huiwen
    Ren, Ruoen
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2018, 505 : 945 - 964
  • [30] Too non-traditional to fail? Determinants of systemic risk for BRICs banks
    Qin, X.
    Zhu, X.
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2014, 21 (04) : 261 - 264