Structure Design and Optimization of the C5-C6 Cervical Intervertebral Fusion Cage Using the Anterior Cervical Plate and Cage Fixation System

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Jiajia [1 ,2 ]
Qian, Zhihui [2 ]
Cui, Changlei [3 ]
Guo, Zhijun [4 ]
Ren, Luquan [2 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Agr Equipment Engn, Luoyang, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Bion Engn, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[3] First Hosp Jilin Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[4] Henan Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Vehicle & Transportat Engn, Luoyang, Henan, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2020年 / 26卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Finite Element Analysis; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Implantation; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; INTERBODY FUSION; NECK MOVEMENTS; MODEL; LOAD; VALIDATION; SUBSIDENCE; DISKECTOMY; STABILITY;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.924236
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The fifth and sixth cervical vertebra (C5-C6) is the most easily injured segment encountered in clinical practice. The anterior cervical plate and cage (ACPC) fixation system is always used to reconstruct the intervertebral height and maintain the segmental stability. The postoperative effect, such as subsidence, neck pain, and non-fusion, is greatly affected by the cervical cage structure design. This study determined reasonable structure size parameters that present optimized biomechanical properties related to the postoperative subsidence often accompanied with ACPC. Material/Methods: Twenty bionic cages with different structural sizes (distance between the center of the cage and groove, groove depth, and groove width) were designed and analyzed based on the regression optimization design and analysis method combined with FE analysis. Because a previous study showed that greater stresses on the endplate are associated with higher risk of subsidence, the optimization object was selected as the stresses on endplate to lower it. Results: The postoperative stresses on the endplate of all cages with bionic structure design were proved to be low- er than with the original one. The optimal structure size was the distance between the center of the cage and groove=0 mm, groove depth=3 mm, and groove width=4 mm. Regression analysis found the cage with optimized bionic structural parameters resulted in a 22.58% reduction of endplate stress response compared with the original one. Conclusions: The bionic cage with optimized structural sizes can reduce the subsidence risk, suggesting that the optimization method has great potential applications in the biomechanical engineering field.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative Analysis of Cervical Arthroplasty Using Mobi-C® and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Husion Using the Solis®-Cage
    Park, Jin Hoon
    Roh, Kwang Ho
    Cho, Ji Young
    Ra, Young Shin
    Rhim, Seung Chul
    Noh, Sung Woo
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 44 (04) : 217 - 221
  • [32] Comparing the Bridge-Type Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer (ROI-C) Interbody Fusion Cage System and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) with Plating and Cage System in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
    He, Shuangjun
    Zhou, Zhangzhe
    Shao, Xiaofeng
    Zhou, Lijian
    Zhang, Changhao
    Zhou, Xinfeng
    Wu, Shuhua
    Chen, Kangwu
    Wang, Yaowei
    Qian, Zhonglai
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (06) : 1100 - 1108
  • [33] Anterior cervical interbody fusion (ACIF) using Ray Conical Threaded Fusion Cage
    Wessels, LS
    11TH EUROPEAN CONGRESS OF NEUROSURGERY: EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETIES (EANS), 1999, : 423 - 427
  • [34] Clinical and radiological comparison of the zero-profile anchored cage and traditional cage-plate fixation in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Zhang, Jun
    Wang, Shanxi
    Tang, Xiangyu
    Xiong, Wei
    Wu, Hua
    Liu, Chaoxu
    Li, Feng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 27 (01)
  • [35] Clinical and radiological comparison of the zero-profile anchored cage and traditional cage-plate fixation in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Jun Zhang
    Shanxi Wang
    Xiangyu Tang
    Wei Xiong
    Hua Wu
    Chaoxu Liu
    Feng Li
    European Journal of Medical Research, 27
  • [36] Comparative Analysis of Cage Subsidence in Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: Zero Profile Anchored Spacer (ROI-C) vs. Conventional Cage and Plate Construct
    Jin, Zhe-yu
    Teng, Yun
    Wang, Hua-zheng
    Yang, Hui-lin
    Lu, Ying-jie
    Gan, Min-feng
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
  • [37] Level-specific Perioperative and Clinical Outcome Comparison: Cervical Disk Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion at C5-C6 in Patients With Myeloradiculopathy
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Parsons, Alexander W.
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Ribot, Max A.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (17) : E1137 - E1147
  • [38] Four-level anterior cervical discectomies and cage-augmented fusion with and without fixation
    Mootaz Shousha
    Ali Ezzati
    Heinrich Boehm
    European Spine Journal, 2012, 21 : 2512 - 2519
  • [39] Four-level anterior cervical discectomies and cage-augmented fusion with and without fixation
    Shousha, Mootaz
    Ezzati, Ali
    Boehm, Heinrich
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (12) : 2512 - 2519
  • [40] Finite element analysis of cervical spine plate using double cage fusion
    Chen, Bingzhi
    Zhao, Wei
    Wang, Yuedong
    Xie, Suming
    2010 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (ICBBE 2010), 2010,