Structure Design and Optimization of the C5-C6 Cervical Intervertebral Fusion Cage Using the Anterior Cervical Plate and Cage Fixation System

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Jiajia [1 ,2 ]
Qian, Zhihui [2 ]
Cui, Changlei [3 ]
Guo, Zhijun [4 ]
Ren, Luquan [2 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Agr Equipment Engn, Luoyang, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Bion Engn, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[3] First Hosp Jilin Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[4] Henan Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Vehicle & Transportat Engn, Luoyang, Henan, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2020年 / 26卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Finite Element Analysis; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Implantation; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; INTERBODY FUSION; NECK MOVEMENTS; MODEL; LOAD; VALIDATION; SUBSIDENCE; DISKECTOMY; STABILITY;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.924236
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The fifth and sixth cervical vertebra (C5-C6) is the most easily injured segment encountered in clinical practice. The anterior cervical plate and cage (ACPC) fixation system is always used to reconstruct the intervertebral height and maintain the segmental stability. The postoperative effect, such as subsidence, neck pain, and non-fusion, is greatly affected by the cervical cage structure design. This study determined reasonable structure size parameters that present optimized biomechanical properties related to the postoperative subsidence often accompanied with ACPC. Material/Methods: Twenty bionic cages with different structural sizes (distance between the center of the cage and groove, groove depth, and groove width) were designed and analyzed based on the regression optimization design and analysis method combined with FE analysis. Because a previous study showed that greater stresses on the endplate are associated with higher risk of subsidence, the optimization object was selected as the stresses on endplate to lower it. Results: The postoperative stresses on the endplate of all cages with bionic structure design were proved to be low- er than with the original one. The optimal structure size was the distance between the center of the cage and groove=0 mm, groove depth=3 mm, and groove width=4 mm. Regression analysis found the cage with optimized bionic structural parameters resulted in a 22.58% reduction of endplate stress response compared with the original one. Conclusions: The bionic cage with optimized structural sizes can reduce the subsidence risk, suggesting that the optimization method has great potential applications in the biomechanical engineering field.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanical Comparison of Optimal Shapes for the Cervical Intervertebral Fusion Cage for C5-C6 Cervical Fusion Using the Anterior Cervical Plate and Cage (ACPC) Fixation System: A Finite Element Analysis
    Wang, Jiajia
    Qian, Zhihui
    Ren, Luquan
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2019, 25 : 8379 - 8388
  • [2] Cage subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a cage alone or combined with anterior plate fixation
    Pinder, Elizabeth M.
    Sharp, David I.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2016, 24 (01): : 97 - 100
  • [3] Biomechanical Comparison of Anterior Cervical Plate Fixation Versus Integrated Fixation Cage for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Murphy, Timothy P.
    Tran, Jeremy D.
    Colantonio, Donald F.
    Le, Anthony H.
    Fredericks, Donald R.
    Roach, William B.
    Chung, Joon
    Pisano, Alfred J.
    Wagner, Scott C.
    Helgeson, Melvin D.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2025, 38 (01): : E1 - E6
  • [4] Anterior cervical fusion with the PCB™ cage-plate system
    M. Volkan Aydin
    Orhan Sen
    Bulent Erdogan
    Levent Sener
    Hakan Caner
    Nur Altinors
    Advances in Therapy, 2004, 21 : 21 - 26
  • [5] Clinical Effectiveness of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Tritanium C Anterior Cervical Cage vs. PEEK Cage
    Croft, Andrew J.
    Wiedel, Abigail J.
    Steinle, Anthony M.
    Zakieh, Omar
    Pennings, Jacquelyn S.
    Davidson, Claudia
    Zuckerman, Scott L.
    Abtahi, Amir M.
    Stephens, Byron F.
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 8 (04): : 399 - 408
  • [6] Anterior cervical fusion with the PCB™ cage-plate system
    Aydin, MV
    Sen, O
    Erdogan, B
    Sener, L
    Caner, H
    Altinors, N
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2004, 21 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [7] Biomechanical Comparison of Integrated Fixation Cage Versus Anterior Cervical Plate and Cage in Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF): A Finite Element Analysis
    Ouyang, Pengrong
    Lu, Teng
    He, Xijing
    Gao, Zhongyang
    Cai, Xuan
    Jin, Zhongmin
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2019, 25 : 1489 - 1498
  • [8] Use of an integrated anterior cervical plate and cage device (PCB) in cervical anterior fusion
    Gu, Yong
    Yang, Hui-Lin
    Chen, Liang
    Dong, Ren-Bin
    Han, Guo-Sheng
    Wu, Gui-Zhong
    Chen, Kang-Wu
    Tang, Tian-Si
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 16 (11) : 1443 - 1448
  • [9] Multilevel anterior cervical fusion with standalone cage or cage-and-plate after cervical discectomy: Benefits and drawbacks
    Eghbal, Keyvan
    Ahrari, Iman
    Kamrani, Fazlollah
    Mohamamdi, Somayeh
    Saffarian, Arash
    Jamali, Mohamad
    Rakhsha, Abbas
    Taheri, Reza
    Rahmanian, Abdolkarim
    Eqbal, Meisam
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (09) : 3760 - 3765
  • [10] Surgical Result of Cervical Anterior Fusion using Hybrid Cage System
    Kusaka, G.
    Yamaguro, T.
    Kanazawa, T.
    Ikota, M.
    Soma, N.
    Yamaguro, T.
    Fujiwara, Y.
    Ebihara, A.
    Ishikawa, M.
    Tanaka, Y.
    15TH EUROPEAN CONGRESS OF NEUROSURGERY, 2015, : 301 - 304