Use of Topical Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Blood Loss in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:15
|
作者
Mallepally, Abhinandan Reddy [1 ]
Mahajan, Rajat [1 ]
Rustagi, Tarush [1 ]
Goel, Shakti Amar [1 ]
Das, Kalidutta [1 ]
Chhabra, Harvinder Singh [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Spinal Injuries Ctr, Dept Spine Serv, New Delhi, India
关键词
Spine surgery; Topical; Tranexamic acid; Surgical blood loss; Cost-effectiveness; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; TOTAL HIP; TRANSFUSION RATES; SPINE SURGERY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.31616/asj.2019.0134
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Nonrandomized, prospective, and case-controlled study. Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of topically applied tranexamic acid (TXA) during different phases of spine surgery. Overview of Literature: Perioperative blood loss is the leading cause of postoperative anemia associated with prolonged stays in hospital and long recovery times. The direct and indirect costs involved pose a significant economic challenge in developing countries. There is no consensus for topical use of tranexamic acid in spine surgery. Methods: Patients requiring a single-level TLIF were divided into two groups. In the TXA group (n=75), the wound surface was soaked with TXA (1 g in 100 mL saline solution) for 3 minutes after exposure, after decompression, and before wound closure, and in the control group (n=175) using only saline. Intraoperative blood loss drain volume was recorded on each of the first 2 days immediately after surgery. An estimated cost analysis was made on the basis of the length of hospital stay and the blood transfusion. Results: IBL for the control group was 783.33 +/- 332.71 mL and for intervention group 410.57 +/- 189.72 mL (p <0.001). The operative time for control group was 3.24 +/- 0.38 hours and for intervention group 2.99 +/- 0.79 hours (p <0.695). Hemovac drainage on days 1 and 2 for control group was 167.10 +/- 53.83 mL and 99.33 +/- 37.5 mL, respectively, and for intervention group 107.03 +/- 44.37 mL and 53.38 +/- 21.99 mL, respectively (p <0.001). The length of stay was significantly shorter in the intervention group (4.8 +/- 1.1 days) compared to control group (7.0 +/- 2.3 days). The cost of treatment in the intervention group was US dollar (USD) 4,552.57 +/- 1,222.6 compared with that in the control group USD 6,529.9 +/- 1,505.04. Conclusions: Topical TXA is a viable, cost-effective method of decreasing perioperative blood loss in major spine surgery with fewer overall complications than other methods. Further studies are required to find the ideal dosage and timing.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 600
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dural Traction a Possible Cause of Hemodynamic Changes During Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Weimer, Jonathan M.
    Marinov, Martin
    Avitsian, Rafi
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 97 : 761.e1 - 761.e3
  • [42] Perioperative and postoperative complications of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly adults
    Lee, Peter
    Fessler, Richard G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 19 (01) : 111 - 114
  • [43] Do Intraoperative radiographs predict final lumbar sagittal alignment following single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Salem, Khalid M., I
    Eranki, Aditya P.
    Paquette, Scott
    Boyd, Michael
    Street, John
    Kwon, Brian K.
    Fisher, Charles G.
    Dvorak, Marcel F.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2018, 28 (05) : 486 - 491
  • [44] Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar artificial disc replacement compared with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in an Asian population
    Lee, Wei Ting
    Liu, Gabriel
    Thambiah, Joseph
    Wong, Hee Kit
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (04) : 208 - 211
  • [45] Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Meng Ge
    Yuan Zhang
    Hang Ying
    Chenchen Feng
    Yanlei Li
    Jinlong Tian
    Tingxiao Zhao
    Haiyu Shao
    Yazeng Huang
    International Orthopaedics, 2022, 46 : 2063 - 2070
  • [46] Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Ge, Meng
    Zhang, Yuan
    Ying, Hang
    Feng, Chenchen
    Li, Yanlei
    Tian, Jinlong
    Zhao, Tingxiao
    Shao, Haiyu
    Huang, Yazeng
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 46 (09) : 2063 - 2070
  • [47] Validation of Impaction Grafting for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Technical Pearls and MicroCT Analysis
    Tortolani, Paul Justin
    Lucas, Sarah L.
    Pivazyan, Gnel
    Wang, Wenhai
    Cunningham, Bryan W.
    SPINE, 2023, 48 (06) : E70 - E77
  • [48] Risk Factors for Medical and Surgical Complications After Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Parrish, James M.
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Yom, Kelly H.
    Kudaravalli, Krishna T.
    Guntin, Jordan A.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (02): : 125 - 132
  • [49] Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Shen, Xiaolong
    Zhang, Hailong
    Gu, Xin
    Gu, Guangfei
    Zhou, Xu
    He, Shisheng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 21 (09) : 1612 - 1616
  • [50] Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Yu, Bin
    Zhang, Jin
    Pan, Jie
    Wang, Yizhou
    Chen, YingGao
    Zhao, Weidong
    Wu, Desheng
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1213 - 1226