Modifying the size distribution of microbubble contrast agents for high-frequency subharmonic imaging

被引:15
|
作者
Shekhar, Himanshu [1 ]
Rychak, Joshua J. [2 ,3 ]
Doyley, Marvin M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[2] Targeson Inc, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Bioengn, San Diego, CA 92093 USA
关键词
nonlinear ultrasound imaging; subharmonic imaging; microbubble contrast agents; vasa vasorum imaging; atherosclerosis; PHOSPHOLIPID-ENCAPSULATED MICROBUBBLES; CODED EXCITATION; VASA VASORUM; ULTRASOUND; ATTENUATION; SENSITIVITY; SCATTERING;
D O I
10.1118/1.4813017
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Subharmonic imaging is of interest for high frequency (>10 MHz) nonlinear imaging, because it can specifically detect the response of ultrasound contrast agents (UCA). However, conventional UCA produce a weak subharmonic response at high frequencies, which limits the sensitivity of subharmonic imaging. We hypothesized that modifying the size distribution of the agent can enhance its high-frequency subharmonic response. The overall goal of this study was to investigate size-manipulated populations of the agent to determine the range of sizes that produce the strongest subharmonic response at high frequencies (in this case, 20 MHz). A secondary goal was to assess whether the number or the volume-weighted size distribution better represents the efficacy of the agent for high-frequency subharmonic imaging. Methods: The authors created six distinct agent size distributions from the native distribution of a commercially available UCA (Targestar-P (R)). The median (number-weighted) diameter of the native agent was 1.63 mu m, while the median diameters of the size-manipulated populations ranged from 1.35 to 2.99 mu m. The authors conducted acoustic measurements with native and size-manipulated agent populations to assess their subharmonic response to 20 MHz excitation (pulse duration 1.5 mu s, pressure amplitudes 100-398 kPa). Results: The results showed a considerable difference between the subharmonic response of the agent populations that were investigated. The subharmonic response peaked for the agent population with a median diameter of 2.15 mu m, which demonstrated a subharmonic signal that was 8 dB higher than the native agent. Comparing the subharmonic response of different UCA populations indicated that microbubbles with diameters between 1.3 and 3 mu m are the dominant contributors to the subharmonic response at 20 MHz. Additionally, a better correlation was observed between the subharmonic response of the agent and the number-weighted size-distribution (R-2 = 0.98) than with the volume-weighted size distribution (R-2 = 0.53). Conclusions: Modifying the size distribution of the agent appears to be a viable strategy to improve the sensitivity of high-frequency subharmonic imaging. In addition, when the size distribution of the UCA has not been suitably modified, the number-weighted size distribution is a useful parameter to accurately describe the efficacy of the agent for high-frequency subharmonic imaging. (C) 2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFECT OF MICROBUBBLE SIZE ON FUNDAMENTAL MODE HIGH FREQUENCY ULTRASOUND IMAGING IN MICE
    Sirsi, Shashank
    Feshitan, Jameel
    Kwan, James
    Homma, Shunichi
    Borden, Mark
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 36 (06): : 935 - 948
  • [32] Excitation of polymer-shelled contrast agents with high-frequency ultrasound
    Ketterling, Jeffrey A.
    Mamou, Jonathan
    Allen III, John S.
    Aristizábal, Orlando
    Williamson, Rene G.
    Turnbull, Daniel H.
    [J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2007, 121 (01):
  • [33] Excitation of polymer-shelled contrast agents with high-frequency ultrasound
    Ketterling, Jeffrey A.
    Mamou, Jonathan
    Allen, John S., III
    Aristizabal, Orlando
    Williamson, Rene G.
    Turnbull, Daniel H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2007, 121 (01): : EL48 - EL53
  • [34] Dual-frequency intravascular ultrasound imaging of microbubble contrast agents: Ex vivo and in vivo demonstration
    Lindsey, Brooks D.
    Martin, K. Heath
    Dayton, Paul A.
    Ma, Jianguo
    Wang, Zhuochen
    Jiang, Xiaoning
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2015,
  • [35] Molecular imaging with targeted contrast agents and high frequency ultrasound
    van Wamel, Annemieke
    Celebi, Muzaffer
    Hossack, John A.
    Backer, Joseph M.
    Backer, Marina V.
    Ley, Klaus
    de Jong, Nico
    Klibanov, Alexander L.
    [J]. 2007 IEEE ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-6, 2007, : 961 - +
  • [36] Harmonic Chirp Imaging with Ultrasound Contrast Agents at High Frequency
    Williams, Ross
    Needles, Andrew
    Cherin, Emmanuel
    Burns, Peter N.
    Foster, F. Stuart
    Leavens, Claudia
    Sherar, Michael D.
    [J]. 2006 IEEE ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-5, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 228 - +
  • [37] Evaluation of microbubble contrast agents for dynamic imaging with x-ray phase contrast
    Millard, T. P.
    Endrizzi, M.
    Everdell, N.
    Rigon, L.
    Arfelli, F.
    Menk, R. H.
    Stride, E.
    Olivo, A.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [38] Pragocytosis of microbubble contrast agents by Kupffer cells and contrast ultrasound imaging of the liver.
    Iijima, HR
    Moriyasu, F
    Suzuki, S
    Miyahara, T
    Yamada, M
    Horibe, T
    Miwa, K
    Yanagisawa, K
    Tsukioka, Y
    Ueda, T
    Yokoi, M
    Tsuchiya, K
    Sasaki, S
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2002, 36 (04) : 705A - 705A
  • [39] Evaluation of microbubble contrast agents for dynamic imaging with x-ray phase contrast
    T. P. Millard
    M. Endrizzi
    N. Everdell
    L. Rigon
    F. Arfelli
    R. H. Menk
    E. Stride
    A. Olivo
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 5
  • [40] Coherent Multi-Transducer Ultrasound Imaging with Microbubble Contrast Agents
    Christensen-Jeffries, Kirsten
    Peralta, Laura
    Reinwald, Michael
    Hajnal, Joseph V.
    Eckersley, Robert J.
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2019, : 2310 - 2312