Longitudinal fluctuation in mammographic percent density differentiates between interval and screen-detected breast cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Strand, Fredrik [1 ,2 ]
Humphreys, Keith [1 ,3 ]
Eriksson, Mikael [1 ]
Li, Jingmei [1 ,4 ]
Andersson, Therese M. L. [1 ]
Tornberg, Sven [5 ]
Azavedo, Edward [2 ,6 ]
Shepherd, John [7 ]
Hall, Per [1 ]
Czene, Kamila [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, POB 281, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Inst, Swedish eSci Res Ctr SeRC, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Genome Inst Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Stockholm Gotland Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Canc Screening, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Karolinska Inst, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, UCSF Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
interval cancer; breast cancer; mammography; mammographic density; early detection; cancer screening; longitudinal study; TUMOR CHARACTERISTICS; RISK PREDICTION; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.30427
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Interval breast cancer (IC) has a more aggressive phenotype and higher mortality than screen-detected cancer (SDC). In this case-case study, we investigated whether the size of longitudinal fluctuations in mammographic percent density (PD fluctuation) was associated with the ratio of IC versus SDC among screened women with breast cancer. The primary study population consisted of 1,414 postmenopausal breast cancer cases, and the validation population of 1,241 cases. We calculated PD fluctuation as the quadratic mean of deviations between actual PD and the long-term trend estimated by a mixed effects model. In a logistic regression model we examined the association between PD fluctuation and IC versus SDC including adjustments for PD at last screening, age at diagnosis, BMI and hormone replacement therapy. All statistical tests were two-sided. There were 385 IC and 1,029 SDC in the primary study population, with PD fluctuations of 0.44 and 0.41 respectively (p=0.0309). After adjustments, PD fluctuation was associated with an increased ratio of IC versus SDC, with an estimated per-standard deviation odds ratio of 1.17 (95% CI=1.03-1.33), compared to 1.19 (95% CI=1.04-1.38) in the validation population. In screened women with breast cancer, high fluctuation in mammographic percent density was associated with an increased ratio of IC versus SDC. Whether this is entirely related to a reduced mammographic detectability or to a biological phenotype promoting faster tumor growth remains to be elucidated. What's new? Interval breast cancers, tumors that spring up between screenings, tend to be more aggressive and deadly than cancers detected by a mammogram. To find out exactly how breast tissue density affects the likelihood of developing such cancers, these authors combed through mammogram data from thousands of breast cancer patients. Their analysis shows that interval cancers occur more frequently in women whose breast density fluctuates more than usual from screening to screening. It's not yet clear whether this is because of something biologically intrinsic to the tumors, or if changing breast density interferes with mammographic detection of tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 40
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mammographic breast density in relation to interval versus screen-detected cancer
    Mandelson, MT
    Oestreicher, N
    Porter, PL
    Taplin, SH
    White, E
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2000, 9 (02) : 233 - 233
  • [2] Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: Comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers
    Mandelson, MT
    Oestreicher, N
    Porter, PL
    White, D
    Finder, CA
    Taplin, SH
    White, E
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (13) : 1081 - 1087
  • [3] Tumour characteristics of screen-detected and interval cancers in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme: A mammographic breast density study
    Timmermans, Lore
    De Brabander, Isabel
    Van Damme, Nancy
    Bleyen, Luc
    Martens, Patrick
    Van Herck, Koen
    Thierens, Hubert
    Bacher, Klaus
    Depypere, Herman
    MATURITAS, 2022, 158 : 55 - 60
  • [4] Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds
    Nguyen, Tuong L.
    Aung, Ye K.
    Li, Shuai
    Nhut Ho Trinh
    Evans, Christopher F.
    Baglietto, Laura
    Krishnan, Kavitha
    Dite, Gillian S.
    Stone, Jennifer
    English, Dallas R.
    Song, Yun-Mi
    Sung, Joohon
    Jenkins, Mark A.
    Southey, Melissa C.
    Giles, Graham G.
    Hopper, John L.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 20
  • [5] Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds
    Tuong L. Nguyen
    Ye K. Aung
    Shuai Li
    Nhut Ho Trinh
    Christopher F. Evans
    Laura Baglietto
    Kavitha Krishnan
    Gillian S. Dite
    Jennifer Stone
    Dallas R. English
    Yun-Mi Song
    Joohon Sung
    Mark A. Jenkins
    Melissa C. Southey
    Graham G. Giles
    John L. Hopper
    Breast Cancer Research, 20
  • [6] Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study
    Fredrik Strand
    Keith Humphreys
    Abbas Cheddad
    Sven Törnberg
    Edward Azavedo
    John Shepherd
    Per Hall
    Kamila Czene
    Breast Cancer Research, 18
  • [7] Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study
    Strand, Fredrik
    Humphreys, Keith
    Cheddad, Abbas
    Tornberg, Sven
    Azavedo, Edward
    Shepherd, John
    Hall, Per
    Czene, Kamila
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 10
  • [8] Mammographic density and histopathologic characteristics of screen-detected tumors in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program
    Moshina, Nataliia
    Ursin, Giske
    Hoff, Solveig Roth
    Akslen, Lars A.
    Roman, Marta
    Sebuodegard, Sofie
    Hofvind, Solveig
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA OPEN, 2015, 4 (09)
  • [9] An analysis of factors associated with interval as opposed to screen-detected breast cancers, including hormone therapy and mammographic density
    Crane, CEB
    Luke, CG
    Rogers, JM
    Playford, PE
    Roder, DM
    BREAST, 2002, 11 (02): : 131 - 136
  • [10] Incidence and Risk Factors of Interval and Screen-Detected Breast Cancer
    Zhang, Yuqi
    Rodriguez, Juan
    Mao, Xinhe
    Grassmann, Felix
    Tapia, Jose
    Eriksson, Mikael
    Hall, Per
    Czene, Kamila
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2025,